|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 12th, 2007, 01:34 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Springfield, Massachusetts
Posts: 63
|
on camera 3.5 Vs. minidisc
I'm contemplating purchasing a much better mic, like the AT 4073 and a preamp like the sound devices mixpre. The camera I'll be using will be a pana AG-DVC7, which only supplies 3.5mm mini audio input, hence the mixpre.
Obviously some of the quality from the higher grade mic and preamp will be lost when recording in camera, but will that loss be significant enough not to bother with recording to camera, and instead purchasing a seperate recording device, like a minidisc? I don't have the budget for a recorder with XLR inputs, so my question really is, will a minidisc be that much superior to recording in camera? I understand there are microphones that do not require phantom power, and adapters to feed XLR to 3.5, but I'm plannning to start investing in high quality audio gear now, and fill in the holes later, AKA maybe an SD 702 CF recorder... eventually. -Alex |
March 12th, 2007, 02:20 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Whether you decide to record in camera or on an external recorder there are a couple of things to keep in mind. The SD MixPre has your choice of outputs - either pro line level output on a pair of balanced XLR connections or consumer line level on an unbalanced stereo 3.5mm minijack. But your camera only has a mic level input and although the connections are right to plug directly from the MixPre's 3.5mm output, the level will be way too hot for the camera and you'll need an attenuating cable or an inline pad to prevent distortion. If you're looking at a minidisk recorder, same thing applies - make sure it has a line level input to plug the MixPre into.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
March 12th, 2007, 02:47 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Springfield, Massachusetts
Posts: 63
|
Steve-
After I had this question answered I was going to post another thread, asking how to manage levels with this setup. I'm unfamiliar with the two devices you mentioned. I understand what they do but am a little unclear on the specifics. If I want to go from the mixpre's 3.5 out to the camcorder's 3.5 in, what might be some appropriate products to get the job done? perhaps... http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...ughType=search Also, why can't I just turn down the gain on the camcorder? Distortion? |
March 12th, 2007, 03:32 PM | #4 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
March 12th, 2007, 04:33 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Springfield, Massachusetts
Posts: 63
|
Alright, well looks like this isn't going to work out, since time is of the essence.
I think I'll just pick up an ME66. There's no reason I'd need a pad to run directly from the mic (running off AA) to an adapter directly into the camera, right? Hopefully the resale is good on the ME66, so I can dump it afterwards. Thanks- -Alex P.S. Hypothetically, could I output from the mix pre on the left XLR (I think left) channel to get a mono signal, then use an XLR pad, and then a 3.5 adapter to get to the camera, or would this just be a waste of cable? On that note, is there any reason why I can't stack them? AKA, three -10db = -30db? |
March 12th, 2007, 05:09 PM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Burlington
Posts: 1,976
|
It would depend on your adapter and your subject matter. The K6/ME66 is a very high-output mic and would probably need some attenuation when adapted to the mini mic input. A BeachTek-type adapter will do this with the attenuation controls, a regular adapter cable won't but you could combine an attenuator with an adapter. AT and Shure make switchable in-line attenuators.
You could attenuate the XLR output of a MixPre, but you'd need 50 to 60 db of attenuation to bring it down to typical mic level. A BeachTek-type adapter can do this with the Mic/Line switch. There are less expensive battery-powered mid-output mics available that might sound better and not require attenuation. It depends on how, where and what you're recording. |
March 14th, 2007, 05:36 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 192
|
You might consider the Sennheiser MKE 300 Video mic (http://www.sennheiser.com/sennheiser...sf/root/03171). It has a 3.5mm connector so you don't have to deal with adapters. I haven't used one in a long time, but I recall it sounding as good as the ME series.
Best wishes, Peter ______________________ http://www.parkfilms.com |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|