Recorder versus Using Mixer to Camera?
I'm trying to figure out the benefits of using a recorder versus sending the mixer output to the camera.
Shots will be talking head documentary style. Tentatively I've decided on: an HV-20, Sound Devices 302 mixer and Sennheiser MKH416 mic. Haven't researched lav mics yet. Since the the HV-20 only has two audio tracks, I guess I need to use a recorder if I go the three or more mic route. I know the camera is the cheapest part of the equation right now, but it's also the part that is most likely to be technologically improved upon. I see the mic, mixer and other equipment as more longterm investments. So do you like recorders, find their worth it? If so, want to suggest any? THANKS MUCH. |
Since the HV20 doesn't have XLR inputs that I know of (without an adapter) (Looks like Stereo mini mic in) You will have to test your set up to see how well it works. Having a back up recording of the sound will mean additional time in Post but could be a lifesaver. Plan on using a manual slate since the HV20 and other HDV low end cams won't output Timecode. Are you sure you don't you at least want to get an XH-A1? Or something else with XLR's and good manual controls.
|
Another consideration is that a lav will sound better than a mis-pointed or distant MKH416. So if it's going to be more than one interviewee you need a boom pole man. And if it's only you with one stationary interviewee at a time, you need a studio type setup with the mic in fixed position closely above and out of the shot, or have to not mind having the mic in the shot on a stand. Otherwise, you'll loose the benefit of having that very fine mic.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Doesn't the A1 use a compressed audio encoder?
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As far as suggestions for specific recorders go, I have a small one "for the road", the M-Audio MicroTrack. Don't rely on its phantom power for your MKH416 mic, but then with the SD302 that you intend to buy (makes me jealous!) you won't need to. I am quite happy with it. Another popular choice seems to be the Zoom recorder. - Martin |
Peter:
This film: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9s3hDShqe18 I'm sound is affected by YouTube compression, but we were all real happy with the sound results. Film was shot with a single Sennheiser ME 66 mounted on a boom, run through a field mixer. Camera was my HV20, Letus35 adapter, and we used DXA-4 Beachtek adapter. We used this mixer: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...Devices_MIXPRE It supplies phantom power, and a 1k tone generator which we set at 12 on the camera's meter. Sound guy was on top of everything. |
Quote:
They are also more prone to wind and popping. Regards, Ty Ford |
Quote:
that's a 4:1 compression ratio, or you're using 25% of the data. Regards, Ty Ford |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ty, Steve, et al,
What lav mics would you recommend for talking head interviews in the subject's house (probably livingroom rigged for taping)? The interviewee will usually be one person, but two people sitting next to each other is a definite possibilty. The interviewer will be off camera. Wired will not be a problem. I've read good things about the Sony EM44B and I believe the 55B. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated, as always. THANKS. |
The 44 and 55 are OK. Visible, but OK.
There are many good lavs. The Sanken Cos 11, Countryman B6, EMW, Sony 77B and 88B, to name a few. Regards, Ty Ford |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network