|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 26th, 2009, 02:04 PM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 358
|
Adaptor or 5D MKII
Hey Guys
Buying a letus or brevis is going to cost me the same as buying a Canon 5D MKII. My point is i shoot weddings so during the day i would like to get my DOF shots. Do i stick with the Adaptors or do i go for the canon. I currently own a canon XH-A1 and i shoot by myself alot of the time. We have the Canon 5D MKII which is compact and light and the adaptor which adds to the front of the camera i guess it is heavy. Do these 2 units do the same job. Rob |
|
|
|
February 27th, 2009, 12:11 AM
|
#2 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,314
|
If you are shooting weddings, I'd go with the adapter and a "normal" video camera instead of the 5DmkII (I currently own both).
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC? Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com |
|
|
|
|
February 27th, 2009, 09:43 AM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 260
|
The best thing the 5D2 has going for it as far as weddings is the low light performance. Receptions and sometimes ceremonies often have very poor lighting (candle light even) and an adapter will make that even more of a problem (if not at times impossible). In the end the 5D2 may be the difference between a clean saturated video and a dark, noisy desaturated video.
On the other hand a camcorder is easiest to use and has the most consistent results. Fiddling around with exposure and manual focus on the 5D2 in "real time" may be asking for trouble. |
|
|
|
|
February 27th, 2009, 09:52 AM
|
#4 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 558
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
