|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 2nd, 2005, 09:26 AM | #16 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Czech republic, Prague
Posts: 159
|
Quote:
__________________
Daves At the beginning there was an idea, then the ambition came and the idea became to be a dream... The Satisfied Dream => http://film.datriware.com |
|
June 2nd, 2005, 02:08 PM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 500
|
Quote:
Could you guys shoot resolution chart with adapter to see if it do HD, SD, or some other resolution figures. Radek |
|
June 2nd, 2005, 06:46 PM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SF, Ca
Posts: 421
|
It does seem like it causes some resolution loss, but until someone runs a rez test it's hard to say for certain.
|
June 2nd, 2005, 06:48 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 293
|
I agree. Resolution chart is in the works.
__________________
========================== Brian Valente Redrock Microsystems |
June 3rd, 2005, 01:15 AM | #20 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Czech republic, Prague
Posts: 159
|
Quote:
I think the difference should be more visible... like : http://test.datriware.com/test2.jpg. Also the shots on your page (as someone said here before) looks cheap :( More pixels doesn not mean more resolution... ;)
__________________
Daves At the beginning there was an idea, then the ambition came and the idea became to be a dream... The Satisfied Dream => http://film.datriware.com |
|
June 3rd, 2005, 01:54 PM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 274
|
Yes, the Micro35 images are much softer than straight from the camera. Also seeing things in motion is another thing.
|
June 3rd, 2005, 02:12 PM | #22 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 804
|
How about that anouncement at the top of the page?
|
June 3rd, 2005, 04:54 PM | #23 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle WA USA
Posts: 125
|
Quote:
(sorry if I'm missing the obvious but I couldn't figure out what you're talking about). Thx. |
|
June 3rd, 2005, 05:34 PM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 804
|
I do not feel confortable at all to point but... (unless I am missing something)
here it is: >>>>>>>>>The Micro35 Project (CLOSED -- see anouncement)<<<<<<<< .................................................................................................... .... >>>Please direct all Micro35-related discussions to their official forum at this link: http://www.redrockmicro.com/forum Chris Hurd San Marcos, TX<<<<<<<<<<<< |
June 3rd, 2005, 06:51 PM | #25 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 293
|
Dan - I'm not sure what you feel uncomfortable about - that thread was the original DIY micro35 thread - Chris pointed out it is no longer active on DVInfo because it was moved to our redrockmicro.com site. The conversation didn't end, it simply moved :)
Kyle - I'm not sure to what you are referring re: seeing things in motion? Also, I am back down to the DVX but I will shoot some resolution charts this weekend. Thanks again for all the feedback. Cheers Brian
__________________
========================== Brian Valente Redrock Microsystems |
June 3rd, 2005, 07:39 PM | #26 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Dan
As you may already know, DV Info Net was the first home for the Micro35. You might say it was born here, just like the ReelStream / Andromeda project. These guys have decided to run their own discussion forum on their own site, and they have every right to do so. I am not going to compete with them for message board traffic over their own product. The proper thing for me to do was to shut down our old Micro35 forum and refer everybody to their new home elsewhere on the web. I have done just that. Please don't try to read anything more into it than that. Hope this helps, |
June 3rd, 2005, 08:58 PM | #27 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 804
|
OK, guys, sorry, my fault.
Is not hard to tell (by some of the pics on my site) that I am up-side-down (;-)< |
June 4th, 2005, 11:37 AM | #28 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 749
|
Not a criticism so much as a heads-up, Brian. At the end of the garden footage, you can still see some vignetting in the bottom left hand corner - it could be a shadow, but it looks suspicious.
|
June 4th, 2005, 06:55 PM | #29 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 274
|
Quote:
|
|
June 5th, 2005, 11:22 AM | #30 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: US & THEM
Posts: 827
|
hmmm, have to agree those stills look very soft, maybe you've got some axial vibration in there?
in fact I've yet to see HD grabs which approach the sharpness of the crude tests I did months ago - have a look at the little white flowerheads in this tiff http://s42.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=0...E26EALWWRXB9CS
__________________
John Jay Beware ***PLUGGER-BYTES*** |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|