Mike Burgess
May 14th, 2008, 03:04 PM
Hello.  Has anyone has added a UV filter to their SR11/12?  Am wondering if a UV filter might have more adverse effects than positive effects on this camcorder.  Also, has anyone noticed any difference between shooting 1920 and 1440, and viewing on a 720p plasma?
Thanks.
Mike
Paul Cronin
May 14th, 2008, 03:10 PM
Mike no adverse effects with a UV filter.  Only shoot HQ 1920.
Tom O'Farrell
May 15th, 2008, 12:00 AM
I wrote a warning thread a couple of weeks ago about not using a UV filter for the purpose of protecting the lens shutters against dust etc. I have a wrecked Sony DVD403 to show for not having a UV filter on at all times.
Paul Cronin
May 15th, 2008, 08:46 AM
I agree with Tom the UV glass is cheap compared to a new lens face.  I do the same on my Sony EX1 and all cameras I have owned over the years.
Mike Burgess
May 15th, 2008, 01:38 PM
Thanks guys, for the responses.
I did a quickie test, comparing a shot with and without the UV filter.  My subject was a scenery shot from a high hilltop.  There was such a small difference that for all intents and purposes, there was no difference.  Indoors, shooting something that is lit through a sunlit window, there is some difference with the color maroon.  Didn't seem to affect the yellows and greens.  So for what its worth, I too would say that a UV filter changes very, very little.  Hoping that on humid days, or days with lots of haze, things will look better.  As for the protection, great point.
Mike Burgess