View Full Version : best Tripod for Sony V1 or FX7


John Gerard
September 8th, 2009, 02:05 PM
Hi all,

I just a month ago, got back fronm the Wimbledon tennis in England. I had a great time and lots of video. Anyway that's for another thread.
I went on a dove hunting trip over the US Labor Day holliday weekend. I currently have the Sony FX-7 camera and a cheep $40us tripod. Viewing the footage I shot I see that it would be much better if I had a much better tripod with a fluid head. The head on the tripod I have just jerks to much as you pan.
I would appreciate some recomendations on which tripod I should get. My price range is $300-$400US. The following is my top priorities....
1) Smooth panning of the tripod head #1.
2) lightweight but sturdy enough so most vidrations are non existant.
3) Quick release of the camera from the tripod.
The Sony has its' own wireless remote so I don't want to wast my money on a tripod with Remote controls. I would rather spend my money on a better head etc.
I also have a Silk model 504QF Tripod with no head. How good is this tripod and what type of heads could I get for the base/legs?

Thank for the advice. I got a Kata bag from recomendations on this board and I really love it.

John gerard

Garry Moore
September 8th, 2009, 03:12 PM
I would go on B&h website and look around, I need to get a better one too, mine is a budget sony that I converted to accept a fluid head, it works but its a matter of time til it breaks. My last cheapy broke so I bought this one quick, good luck Garry

Zach Love
September 9th, 2009, 03:44 AM
Sachtler Soom is the best tripod in my opinion for HDV cameras. It costs nearly $3k, but it is everything that you would want a tripod to be.
Sachtler | 0480 FSB-6 with Soom and Tri-Spreader | 0480 | B&H (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/544094-REG/Sachtler_0480_0480_FSB_6_with_Soom.html)


At the low end, for less than $200 you can get a Davis & Sanford. Much lower quality than Sachtler (obviously), but they're owned by Tiffen so you'll have great customer support.
Davis & Sanford | Pro Vista Tripod with FM 18 | PROVISTA7518B (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/243272-REG/Davis_Sanford_PROVISTA7518B_Pro_Vista_Tripod_with.html)
Davis & Sanford | PROVISTAGR18 Provista | PROVISTAGR18 | B&H (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/598810-REG/Davis_Sanford_PROVISTAGR18_PROVISTAGR18_Provista_Professional_Video.html)

A lot of people use Bogen sticks & heads. The 503 head is considered by many to be the cheapest / best head out there. There are a bunch of Bogen tripods to look at, but I personally like Gitzo more than Bogen.

I currently use a really old Gitzo Strudex w/ a Bogen 503 head. I love it because it is REALLY solid & I can get shots from 18" to 7'. (I don't think it is too heavy, but I have a lot of experience with Betacams, so anything less than 20lbs is light.)

The biggest thing I would say is get something with a ball / half bowl. Once you use one you'll never want to go back to leveling each leg at a time.

If you don't get a tripod w/ a half bowl, at least get this: Manfrotto 438 Manfrotto by Bogen Imaging | 438 Compact Levelling Head - | 438 (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=workaround.jsp&A=details&Q=&sku=554093&is=REG)

Leslie Wand
September 9th, 2009, 04:25 AM
also check out miller - dv5 and solo legs....

whatever - a good tripod is well worth spending money on - a good choice will see you through 3 > 4 cameras. a cheap one will see you through 2 > 3 per camera ;-)

Zach Love
September 9th, 2009, 11:37 AM
also check out miller - dv5 and solo legs....

whatever - a good tripod is well worth spending money on - a good choice will see you through 3 > 4 cameras. a cheap one will see you through 2 > 3 per camera ;-)

I'll up your wager.... A good tripod can last you 3-4 decades. A cheap one can break after 2-3 months of usage.

If you're spending the money on a camera, spend the money on the accessories too. I have never seen a tripod at Best Buy that I would consider to be usable for video, check out B&H and other online retailers and get a good video tripod & head.

I think putting a V1 on a cheap tripod is like putting a V1 in the hands of a 4yr old. Video won't be steady & there is an awful good chance the camera is going to be dropped on the ground.

Adam Gold
September 9th, 2009, 02:15 PM
I'll echo what Zach says about the 438 leveling head. I have them on my rigs and they're indispensable, and give you the advantage of quick leveling while still having an extendable center column for emergencies. Here's my rig:

Manfrotto by Bogen Imaging | 028B Tripod Legs (Black) with | B&H (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/523630-REG/Manfrotto_by_Bogen_Imaging__028B_Tripod_Legs_Black_.html)

I actually have two of these although they are slightly older versions, and I've been pleased with them. Maybe not the beefiest around but I think a good value -- slightly above your budget but not in the ridiculously stratospheric range.

I also have two of the Davis and Sanford FM18 kits mentioned above, and they are are great value for a smaller cam like the FX7. I use the D&Ses for my FX7s and the Manfrottos for my FX1s and 1000s.

By the way, you do know that your requirement number 2 is impossible with two mutually exclusive attributes?

James J. Lee
September 9th, 2009, 08:19 PM
I went with the Bogen/Manfrotto 701HDV head for mine (based on these recommendations from MediaStorm (MediaStorm: Gear Kits (http://www.mediastorm.com/submissions/gear.htm).) I wanted to keep my whole kit as light as possible and often wish I had something a little more stable/fluid as my movements are never as clean as they should be on the pod. So, I'd recommend the 501 as a minimum. For legs, something with a leveling feature is an absolute must. You won't believe how much quicker and easier it makes set-up.
Take a look at the Manfrotto/Bogen kits at B&H. Note, that many will take an additional leveling column that I've used and they work pretty slick. They have several in the 400-500 range that will be a big step up from where you are now. Then, like the rest of us, you'll need to learn to work within the limitations of your equipment. Cheers, JLee

Gabor Heeres
September 10th, 2009, 03:11 AM
Cheap, Rocksolid and very smooth pans and tilts:

Secced Ares 2 Tripod Kit - Proactive (http://www.proav.co.uk/Tripods-Supports/Tripod-Kits/p16706_sc497.aspx)

For your kind of camera this is almost an ideal tripod. Is there a store in the USA that sells secced?

John Gerard
September 11th, 2009, 07:16 PM
Hi again,

I now have narrowed down my selection to the Bogan 501HDV head. My Camera is only 4-5 lbs with a bigger battery so this head seems to be the right balance. One question about the head. I looked at one at a local camera store "Adolph Gasser" in San Francisco. It looks like there is a slide plate but no quick release. Is this correct? I do really like the quick release feature. If I am correct, What would be a simular head with a quick release option?
I have been looking on B&H Photo's site and there are a ton of Kits in the $260-$400.00US range. For legs this is a had decision. One of many models is the 190CX3. This is one of the few legs that are Carbon Fiber I think it will accept the 556B Leveling Center Column. This has only a 55mm half ball if that is going to be a limiting factor.
Any other recomendations on B&H kits are greatly appreciated. Attached I took photos of my other 2 tripod. The black one is a Slik 504QF (no Head) and the silver one is a quantum QSX 700I, I think. THis tripod has been very good for a $40 tripod it has a built in level. The head is not as fluid as I would like and it takes a while to get the level just right. This one also has a quick release head and spiked feet.
The Slik is a little beefier tripod. I wonder if I could use a 501 head with it?

John Gerard

John Gerard
September 13th, 2009, 02:54 PM
Hi,
So, from your usage of the 701 setup. Do you think it is the head or the legs or both that you don't like? I am thinking of going with the 501 head a little bigger unit. What's your thoughts?

Thanks,

John Gerard

I went with the Bogen/Manfrotto 701HDV head for mine (based on these recommendations from MediaStorm (MediaStorm: Gear Kits (http://www.mediastorm.com/submissions/gear.htm).) I wanted to keep my whole kit as light as possible and often wish I had something a little more stable/fluid as my movements are never as clean as they should be on the pod. So, I'd recommend the 501 as a minimum. For legs, something with a leveling feature is an absolute must. You won't believe how much quicker and easier it makes set-up.
Take a look at the Manfrotto/Bogen kits at B&H. Note, that many will take an additional leveling column that I've used and they work pretty slick. They have several in the 400-500 range that will be a big step up from where you are now. Then, like the rest of us, you'll need to learn to work within the limitations of your equipment. Cheers, JLee

Les Nagy
September 13th, 2009, 10:11 PM
I would appreciate some recomendations on which tripod I should get. My price range is $300-$400US. The following is my top priorities....
1) Smooth panning of the tripod head #1.
2) lightweight but sturdy enough so most vidrations are non existant.
3) Quick release of the camera from the tripod.
John gerard

I have stayed out of this with the hopes that you might read some of the other threads here on tripod recommendations. Please read the following:
http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/tripod-sticks-heads/239172-tripod-camera-why-why-why.html
http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/tripod-sticks-heads/238166-sachtler-fsb-8-75-cf-speed-lock-vs-miller-dv20-solo-cf.html
http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/tripod-sticks-heads/364283-miller-vs-manfrotto.html

After reading these threads I hope you come to the conclusion that what you are asking for as priorities and the price range you are hoping to match are mutually exclusive.

Please reconsider your price range and look at something that is worthwhile.

Maybe, and I mean just maybe, this will be OK.
Libec | LS22M2A Tripod System | LS-22M(2A) | B&H Photo Video (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/458963-REG/Libec_LS_22M_2A__LS22M2A_Tripod_System.html)
I have no experience with it, and I am sticking my neck out by even mentioning it. I can only say that it is probably better than what you are looking to do.

Mike Beckett
September 14th, 2009, 02:06 AM
"Me too", Les.

If you really, really can't afford decent tripod (starting with a Sachtler FSB-4, $700 or so) then don't waste your pennies on Manfrotto/Bogen. LS-22 is OK and a bit of counterbalance adjustment, and is a good stopgap until you can afford something better. The Manfrottos are stable enough (well, the 501/3 series), but their fluid may as well be jello.

Slik and other cheaper (and Velbon etc.) - I've used them in the past, on an olde Canon Hi8 camera, and I wouldn't even leave my camera locked off on it, let alone try good pans/tilts. I wouldn't dare put a $2000 camera (or $5000 as I paid for it) on such a contraption.

As Les says, there's plenty of other threads, check 'em out. Read the stories from me and others of all the money that was wasted on the way to good tripods. And, if you really must, get one cheap-ish (probably Libec) then don't open your wallet again until you can get something really good - a "big bang" upgrade rather than a series of expensive little upgrades like me.

Just a point: You don't need to get a $3000 SOOM system for a FSB head from Sachtler. Check out B&H or other dealers, you can get basic systems fro $600-700.

James J. Lee
September 14th, 2009, 08:29 AM
There certainly will be limitations based on your budget. I was newspaper VJ for a large paper and though we had some Sachtler kits we often choose the magfiber Manfrotto stiks w/ 501 heads for use with our Z1s and XHA1s for their light weight and compactness, with the understanding that we needed to keep pans & long zooms to a minimum. They worked fine for OUR PURPOSES and I've even had footage from them aired on Discovery Channel. But, I recently discovered that the 701hdv paired with my Gitzo sticks is too light. And yes, the 501 & 503s all should have QR plates. You just need to understand that kits in this price range are considered ENTRY level.

James J. Lee
September 14th, 2009, 12:25 PM
Check out the used shop at B&H, they've got the 755 Magfiber with lvl center column that worked well for us Used Manfrotto by Bogen Imaging | 755CX3 MagFiber Video | 755CX3 (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/800653899-USE/Manfrotto_by_Bogen_Imaging_755CX3_755CX3_MagFiber_Video_Tripod.html)
Combined with a 501 or 503, I think it's about as good as you can do close to your budget.

Les Nagy
September 14th, 2009, 08:10 PM
The 501 and 503 are NOT good enough for ANY HD work.

Garry Moore
September 20th, 2009, 10:04 AM
This discussion shamed me into getting a better tripod, so I looked on craigslist for a used rig....well I found a Bogen 3021 silver legged tripod. Asking $100 I gave him $80, threaded on my 3160 fluid head and I now have a solid base for my V1U !! Its a heck of an upgrade for me, I should chuck that other thing I've got in the trash. What a difference ...wow ! Thanks guys, now I need a leveler...

Chris McMahon
January 8th, 2010, 07:11 PM
Sachtler Soom is the best tripod in my opinion for HDV cameras. It costs nearly $3k, but it is everything that you would want a tripod to be.
Sachtler | 0480 FSB-6 with Soom and Tri-Spreader | 0480 | B&H (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/544094-REG/Sachtler_0480_0480_FSB_6_with_Soom.html)

I had the opportunity to shoot a few shots with a HPX170 mounted to one of these a few weeks back. I have this to say: Super smooth.

Richard D. George
January 9th, 2010, 07:17 PM
As Les stated, the 501 and the 503 are not up to the task for HD shooting. Please re-consider your choices, and look at a Sachtler FSB-4 or FSB-6 fluid head. There is no comparison at all, the the results will be painfully obvious in your final footage.

John Gerard
January 10th, 2010, 03:41 PM
Hi all,

Thanks for the great replies. I gave up looking for a new tripod for awhile. One comment, my tripod I am using now for the cost works ok. I never felt it was going to break at least. It has the center column Y brace that adds a lot to the stability. I would never leave my camera on the tripod out doors and walk away from it as I don't trust this tripod that much. In doors not as much of a problem if someone does not knock it over. Because the head is made for a 35mm still camera I have to lock the head down pretty tight to keep the camera from swinging forward, if that is the correct terminology. I had a chance to try at the local camera store a Bogan 503 and 701, or was it the 501 which ever the bigger head size is. These seem OK but slow when it comes to panning. Am I right? There is no adjustment to change the speed. Some times I am taking video that need a slow but fluid movement and other times while taking tennis videos sitting next to the court I seed a fast pan to keep up with the action. My current tripod works pretty good for this type of motion although I have never used anything better. I am not arguing with the people that say to get a really good tripod I just don't know what that is and spending 2-3K on one with out that knowledge is hard for me to do. That's why I might eventually get a little bit cheeper tripod for now even if that means I will be getting a better one latter. I am glad I got to use an VHS-C video camera for a while before investing in the FX7. This allowed for a better purchase as to what I really needed and didn't need. I wish there were local places where I can try out tripods before I buy like buying a tennis racquet. I never buy a tennis racquet without trying at test 10 different ones first. The rental fee is only about $10 us and some places will even put that money towards the purchase of the racquet. Tennis racquets are upwards of $240 us. I do agree that I have a hard time leveling the legs on my current tripod and it takes a long time. It would be nice to have a bowl system, if that is the correct term, for this but I could probably go without it if I needed to.

Thanks,

John Gerard

D.J. Ammons
January 21st, 2010, 08:25 PM
As Les stated, the 501 and the 503 are not up to the task for HD shooting. Please re-consider your choices, and look at a Sachtler FSB-4 or FSB-6 fluid head. There is no comparison at all, the the results will be painfully obvious in your final footage.

I would have to respectfully disagree. I bought both the Sachtler FSB6 and the 503HDV at the same time with the FSB6 costing about three times the 503HDV. My thought was that I would use the more expensive tripod most of the time.

However I had bought the 503HDV with a Bogen Manfrotto tripod with the center column crank and the FSB6 with just a regular Satchtler tripod (I forget the model numbers)

Since I am mostly filming weddings and smal music venues it turns out the 503HDV on the tripod that cranks up high over peoples heads is the setup I use most.

I do agree that the FSB6 is a better head and a tad smoother but I get excellent results with the 503HDV.

John Gerard
January 22nd, 2010, 02:03 PM
How do you find the speed of the 503 head? I guess it all depends on the type of video you are shooting. I have never done any Wedding video but it seems like you would not need a very fast panning head for that type of work just a very smooth pan.

John Gerard

Adam Gold
February 2nd, 2010, 02:48 PM
It's been a while since anyone responded, so I'll jump in.

I'm not an expert, nor a high-level pro like many of the other shooters here, but I have to say both the Manfrotto 503 and the 503HDV work just fine for me, for what they are and what they cost. I never have a problem achieving very smooth pans and tilts with either, as fast or as slow as I want.

Would I love to be able to afford four $2,000 heads for the multicam work we do? Sure. There's no doubt in my mind that the Vintens and Sachtlers and other heads costing as much as a car are better, and probably much better. But for the price, I think the Manfrottos are very good values and they perform -- at least for me -- as advertised. I get a little annoyed when people compare a $350 head to a head costing three or five or ten times as much and say the cheaper one is crap. I shoot exclusively HDV on Z5s and I've never had a problem with the heads that wasn't due to operator error (aka me being a clumsy idiot and hitting the cam with my elbow).

By the way, John, love the photos. How did you get the tripod to stick to the wall like that?

Richard D. George
February 4th, 2010, 11:10 AM
Many other voices besides mine state that the 503 and 503 HDV are not suitable for HD footage. Regarding height, the Sachtler Soom system addresses this issue.

John Gerard
February 8th, 2010, 03:38 PM
Hi,

Thanks for the extra information/ thoughts. I am not sure what you are referring to about the photos unless you are just kidding. All I did was to place the tripods in front of a white wall and take some stills. I was able to do this with some other items and them cut them out of the background using Photoshop to use in my custom DVD menus.

John Gerard

It's been a while since anyone responded, so I'll jump in.

I'm not an expert, nor a high-level pro like many of the other shooters here, but I have to say both the Manfrotto 503 and the 503HDV work just fine for me, for what they are and what they cost. I never have a problem achieving very smooth pans and tilts with either, as fast or as slow as I want.

Would I love to be able to afford four $2,000 heads for the multicam work we do? Sure. There's no doubt in my mind that the Vintens and Sachtlers and other heads costing as much as a car are better, and probably much better. But for the price, I think the Manfrottos are very good values and they perform -- at least for me -- as advertised. I get a little annoyed when people compare a $350 head to a head costing three or five or ten times as much and say the cheaper one is crap. I shoot exclusively HDV on Z5s and I've never had a problem with the heads that wasn't due to operator error (aka me being a clumsy idiot and hitting the cam with my elbow).

By the way, John, love the photos. How did you get the tripod to stick to the wall like that?

Adam Gold
February 10th, 2010, 06:31 PM
Yes, it was a joke. The photos are all sideways.