James Gleason
April 4th, 2006, 10:51 AM
I've searched through these forums for the past few weeks and although there are a lot of user contributions about this monitor, my questions is simple (I think): how can a monitor that has a resolution of 800x480 be considered "HD?"
I've seen this monitor at a trade show and was impressed with it's color and luminance, but does it really work as a viable "HD" monitor? Is it a trade off because it's a "field" monitor and not the 17+inches that a 1080p or 720p monitor can deliver?
I just received by HVX200 and am in the market for a field/studio monitor. Does this one "really" suffice? Or should you use this one in the field and a much larger one in the studio? Right now I can't afford both.
Even the upcoming 8.4 inch version is only 800x600 pixals and that is becuase it's a 4:3 native monitor, vs. the 16:9 native of the 7 inch.
Questions...answer?
I've seen this monitor at a trade show and was impressed with it's color and luminance, but does it really work as a viable "HD" monitor? Is it a trade off because it's a "field" monitor and not the 17+inches that a 1080p or 720p monitor can deliver?
I just received by HVX200 and am in the market for a field/studio monitor. Does this one "really" suffice? Or should you use this one in the field and a much larger one in the studio? Right now I can't afford both.
Even the upcoming 8.4 inch version is only 800x600 pixals and that is becuase it's a 4:3 native monitor, vs. the 16:9 native of the 7 inch.
Questions...answer?