|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 11th, 2013, 08:15 AM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 410
|
Black Magic Cinema 4K
Has their been any discussion on how good this camera is in low light? I know that the original wasn't terrible, but I was hoping this one would be better. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Chad Dyle |
|
|
|
May 11th, 2013, 03:00 PM
|
#2 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Brownsville, OR
Posts: 116
|
Re: Black Magic Cinema 4K
My understanding is that it will be not as good as the BMCC when it comes to low light shooting.
|
|
|
|
|
May 11th, 2013, 03:07 PM
|
#3 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: switzerland
Posts: 2,133
|
Re: Black Magic Cinema 4K
the purpose of this camera is to be used in situation where light is controlled (studio), so low light should not be a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
May 12th, 2013, 02:10 AM
|
#4 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Zutphen, NL
Posts: 47
|
Re: Black Magic Cinema 4K
The sensor is bigger, so that would mean more light sensitivity. But it's also got more pixels, so that'd slightly decrease sensitivity. The original version had a native ISO of 400 (if I'm not mistaken) - the 4K seems to be getting ISO 640 as its native value. So all in all I suspect the 4K to be very close to the original, with the original being the 'winner'. Though I guess it's too early to tell at this stage. Wait and see, it's all we can do for now.
|
|
|
|
|
May 12th, 2013, 07:41 AM
|
#5 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Incline Village, Nevada
Posts: 604
|
Re: Black Magic Cinema 4K
The original BMCC (2.5) has a native ISO of 800
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
