Macro lenses for T2i at DVinfo.net

Anil Dasari · April 20th, 2010, 12:50 AM

Friends,

I am doing some research on macro lenses to use with T2i and came across many nice reviews on Canon 100mm 2.8 EF USM lens. Looks like, if one must have only one macro lens, then this is it. I almost decided to buy this lens, when I came across Canon 60mm 2.8 EF-S USM macro lens. Even this lens has great reviews. Now I am thoroughly confused.

My needs for a macro are: 1:1 magnification - obviously; and the ability to take portrait pictures. The difference I found between 100mm and 60mm lenses are one is EF and the other is EF-S. One is slightly heavier and the other is lighter & compact. One gives about 20cm front-of-the-lens to subject distance and the other only gives 10cm front-of-the-lens to subject distance for maximum magnification. And, one is $125 more than the other.

Now, for my T2i, is the extra $125 on the 100mm lens make a huge difference in picture quality, or am I better off with the 60mm lens?

What would you do? I'd much appreciate your suggestions.

Robert Turchick · April 20th, 2010, 01:02 AM

The 100 will work on all eos cameras so when you move up to a 5D or 1D, you can keep this lens. The 60mm is only for cropped sensor (T2i and 7D).
That's one difference.

Focal length is quite different but truly a matter of preference. What are you shooting?

Personally, I'd save up the pennies and go for the 100mm f2.8L for $950. Much better glass and it has IS.

Anil Dasari · April 20th, 2010, 01:19 AM

Thank you, Robert.

I'm not sure what I'll be shooting :-) Just got bitten by the macro bug after seeing all those pictures. One thing for sure is, I may not be going after bugs and insects .... not very often. Mostly flowers and other relatively static subjects.

I also want to use it to film extreme close-up movie shots.

Perhaps I should rent these lenses, see the difference, and then decide?

Stephen Mick · April 20th, 2010, 07:21 AM

+1 on the Canon 100mm f2.8L Macro. It's one of the best and most sharpest lenses I think Canon has ever made. And the new "hybrid" IS system in it means you can even shoot handheld on the T2i and get some great stuff.

Save the money. Buy once. Cry once.

Francois Lacasse · April 20th, 2010, 08:02 AM

Hi Anil,

I think you should rent them first...

Although the 100mm is THE macro lens, it's pretty long (160mm equiv.) for portraits, especially indoors.

Don't forget to take a look at the Tamron 60mm f2. As far as versatility, it's tough to beat.

My 0.02 ...

Anil Dasari · April 20th, 2010, 06:40 PM

Stephen, Francois:

thank you. So now I have two more lenses to consider :-)

April 20th, 2010, 12:50 AM	#1
Anil Dasari Regular Crew Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 47	Macro lenses for T2i Friends, I am doing some research on macro lenses to use with T2i and came across many nice reviews on Canon 100mm 2.8 EF USM lens. Looks like, if one must have only one macro lens, then this is it. I almost decided to buy this lens, when I came across Canon 60mm 2.8 EF-S USM macro lens. Even this lens has great reviews. Now I am thoroughly confused. My needs for a macro are: 1:1 magnification - obviously; and the ability to take portrait pictures. The difference I found between 100mm and 60mm lenses are one is EF and the other is EF-S. One is slightly heavier and the other is lighter & compact. One gives about 20cm front-of-the-lens to subject distance and the other only gives 10cm front-of-the-lens to subject distance for maximum magnification. And, one is $125 more than the other. Now, for my T2i, is the extra $125 on the 100mm lens make a huge difference in picture quality, or am I better off with the 60mm lens? What would you do? I'd much appreciate your suggestions.

April 20th, 2010, 01:02 AM	#2
Robert Turchick Trustee Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Mesa, AZ Posts: 1,389	The 100 will work on all eos cameras so when you move up to a 5D or 1D, you can keep this lens. The 60mm is only for cropped sensor (T2i and 7D). That's one difference. Focal length is quite different but truly a matter of preference. What are you shooting? Personally, I'd save up the pennies and go for the 100mm f2.8L for $950. Much better glass and it has IS. __________________ The older I get, the better I was!

April 20th, 2010, 07:21 AM	#4
Stephen Mick Regular Crew Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 167	Canon 100mm f2.8L +1 on the Canon 100mm f2.8L Macro. It's one of the best and most sharpest lenses I think Canon has ever made. And the new "hybrid" IS system in it means you can even shoot handheld on the T2i and get some great stuff. Save the money. Buy once. Cry once.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

April 20th, 2010, 01:19 AM	#3
Anil Dasari Regular Crew Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 47	Thank you, Robert. I'm not sure what I'll be shooting :-) Just got bitten by the macro bug after seeing all those pictures. One thing for sure is, I may not be going after bugs and insects .... not very often. Mostly flowers and other relatively static subjects. I also want to use it to film extreme close-up movie shots. Perhaps I should rent these lenses, see the difference, and then decide?

April 20th, 2010, 08:02 AM	#5
Francois Lacasse New Boot Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Montreal, Canada Posts: 11	Hi Anil, I think you should rent them first... Although the 100mm is THE macro lens, it's pretty long (160mm equiv.) for portraits, especially indoors. Don't forget to take a look at the Tamron 60mm f2. As far as versatility, it's tough to beat. My 0.02 ...

April 20th, 2010, 06:40 PM	#6
Anil Dasari Regular Crew Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 47	Stephen, Francois: thank you. So now I have two more lenses to consider :-)