Quote:
Originally Posted by Perrone Ford
(Post 1559862)
So I just had a look through EBay at these lenses. I can't find any compelling reason to buy one. The only lens faster than F2.8 was the range of 50/55mm lenses and they were more expensive than the Nikons.
|
Agree about cost, not so sure about speed. 10 years ago, these lenses were peanuts. I built my collection a few years ago, and since then most or all of them have doubled in value. Expensive or not, they are a good investment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perrone Ford
(Post 1559862)
So the problem for me is this:
The lenses are slow. I can get Nikon glass at F2 or faster for the entire cinematic range.
|
Wow, slow is a bit harsh. There is no 85mm f/1.4 to match the Nikon (I have my heart set on a Samyang), and there is a gap below 35mm for fast takumars (I have a nice Vivitar 28mm f/1.9 for that) but otherwise there are options.
The 35mm f/2 is a great lens, if not the best Takumar. The 85mm f/1.8 is very special. I have the 85mm f/1.9, and it is also a fine lens. As you said there are the 50mm varieties. The f/1.4 SMC is legendary, nuff said. Some say the 50mm f/1.2 is the finest, but it is super rare. Less rare is the 55mm f/1.8, which is a VERY underrated lens, believe me. Especially considering you can still get it for pennies.
Beyond f/2 you have the 135mm f/2.5, which is another GREAT lens. Finally the 105mm f/2.8 is worth a mention and has its uses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perrone Ford
(Post 1559862)
They aren't any cheaper. This is what really surprised me.
I don't think the glass is any better.
|
Agree. Maybe worse. Depends on your preference, but I promise you Takumar images have a special character which is exciting. Also, although it doesn't necessarily make your video any better, the build quality and focus action of these lenses is a dream to work with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perrone Ford
(Post 1559862)
I'd have to buy new adapters (both to Nikon and Canon).
I'd have to buy step up rings for my current filters.
|
Yes the best way is to shell out on adapters and rings for each lens, which does mount up. Saying that, M42 adapters open up other possibilities for yard sale finds. I have a 15 blade 'bokeh monster' 135mm f/2.8 Pentacon, which is just superb and cost £40.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perrone Ford
(Post 1559862)
I'm sorry, and I was curious. But I can't see how this would make any good economic sense for me. If I had an M42 body maybe...
|
You are of course correct, but I never let economic sense interfere with my lens buying addiction. I still plan to buy a Nikkor.