You ust might be right.

This is my first item shipped form Russia. And today i traced the package again, and its location has changed from Kirov to Moscow.


And i bought the item on October the 8th, and as it seams they dispatched the item only on 23rd.

It took me about a month to get my Mir24s and Helios 44s, which all came from Russia and the former Soviet Union areas.

Anyone know of a good Minolta to EOS adapter?

After 31 days my Mir 24N(H) is finally here. :)

Also got my Nikon to EoS adapter, but the problem is , i can't get the lens on the Camera.


EDIT: All good now, the adapter was screwed on wrong. :)

Good to hear Gustavs!

I just purchased a Tokina RMC 17mm but its a Minolta MD mount. I am still waiting to hear back from anyone who knows a good adapter. I have read that it is difficult to find a good one that allows you to focus to infinity..

Hi Terry,

The Minolta to EOS adapters that allow for infinity focus have glass optics which lower the amount of light reaching the sensor and can lessen the image quality. The reason is that the Minolta spec, like older Canon manual focus lenses, have a lens-to-mirror distance that is less than the EOS specification - the back of the Minolta lens goes too far into the body to allow for the mirror to go up and also doesn't allow the correct distance between the glass and the sensor to enable infinity focussing. There are conversions available for some Canon and Minolta manual focus lenses. The back of the lens is disassembled and a Canon EF mount is permanently attached. You can see on this page which lenses need optics in the adapters and which don't, requiring only a metal spacer:

Canon EOS lens Adapters - Manual focus lenses on Canon EOS bodies

fungus?
 

Hi... it's been a while now since I caught the microb of vintage lenses but today a pentacon 135mm f2.8 (amazing lense you should try it) that just arrived I think it has fungus on the rear element.
I'm getting ichy just by watching it :-))))
Please check the picture and tell me if I am right...

It is not visible on the footage though.. I'll post some later.
Thanks!

To be honest its hard to tell from such a small pic. You should zoom in with max focus on that part.

But from my pow it looks as if some sort of powder .

Im actualy amazed how anything can get into the lens. :)

I'll post a zommed image later... thanx.

Fungus
 

This is the zoomed version....
It's a bit out of focus but a search I did in google I found similar erosion on other lenses that was caused by fungus...

George, I'd advise you not to mount lenses with fungus to your camera or mix with other good lenses in same bag, because it can sometimes spread to other lenses.
Regarding the Pentacon 135mm f/2.8, when it has clean glass, it is a decent lens and I used to use one for badger photography with an LLC camera many years ago. The Pentax SMC-M I found a far better optic than the old Pentacon and well worth looking out for.

Hey, this thread went completely quiet!
Any news?

I'm putting together a few shots that I got w/ my helios 44m-4 and nikkor 24mm f2 on the 60d.
I'll post it in a few days...

Shot w vintage lenses
 

Ok this is a good low light example...
Shot with 60D + Nikkor 24mm f2 + Helios 44m-4 58mm f2 + Zenitar 16mm f2.8 fisheye.

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

That is very cool George.. i've also added MF lenses with our newer lenses
Nikon 50 1.4
Helios 44 58mm 2.0
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 3.5 (67mm Kiron version)
Hanimar 135/3.5 & 28/2.8
Pentacon 55/1.8
Super Takumar 105mm f/2.8

As for the video..What was your ISO setting? Is this footage pretty much raw? any post color correction?
Cannot wait for my adapters to come so i can try out these babies :)


Kren
Vertical Video Works* Winnipeg Videography

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Kren,
For iso settings I just used a general rule: Stay low! But my average setting was 2500. I know that was not the best way to go but I did anyway...
I also did a little bit of color grading inside my editing app in order to give it some "personality".

Hope you'll enjoy your new babies...
Cheers

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Hello (My account was finally activated !)
I bought my T2i body one month ago and before puchasing it, I googled a lot about good lenses to get for a good start.
And... I ended up on this thread so first of all, thank you to all the users who gave their opinion and especially Terry Lee for starting this thread :)

It has been a wonderful ressource, I think I have read the whole thread several times.
For sure I was impressed by the video from Regis Hervagault and also the one that was posted just above by George Prada (love the mood of it).

I decided to go for some of the lenses that were top rated here :
I purchased the mighty Helios 44m 58mm f/2, a Pentacon 135mm f/2.8 MC and a third one that was not listed here, a Pentacon 28mm f/2.8 MC, looks like it is exactly the same serie as the 135mm 2.8.

It happened that I ended up using the 28mm most of the time for a wider field of view, so far it has been good (after cleaning it with the proper tools) but I can't really tell about the quality... however, what I can say is that it isn't really sharp at f/2.8. I think this lens really isn't exceptionnal.
Writing this message reminds me that I should make some real tests with it.
I also noticed some vignetting, have to test that too.
Since I am using it mostly for video and that, in the end, it will probably be watched on a website like Vimeo or Youtube, I can live with some chromatic aberrations and a lack of sharpness.

Maybe someone here had a try with the same lens, it was the same price as the 135mm, 28€(40$).

Thanks again for the great help :) Several of my friends at my film school are now getting ready to find M42 adapters for their cameras !

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

not all old glass is very good wide open. you'll find thats why some older glass costs as much as new glass, its got good wide open performance. modern glass is almost always much better wide open, however, stop 1-2 stops down and it should be fine. you might also find that going up one notch on the detail level will help too if you are at min.

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Simon,
My concern with vintage lenses is that they are not always so sharp like new lenses.
But anything that is sharp enough to shoot video is ok. For stills I use the tokina 11-16 and the canon 17-55 that came with the kit.
The main benefit that you get by using vintage lenses is that "lens personality". That includes color rendition, bokeh, sharpness etc..

The only vintage lens that I can shoot stills with is the helios 44-4m 58mm f2.
Good luck with your journey to digital cinematography with 100% analog lenses!

p.s. I'm really jealous of your pentagon 135mm! Is it the one with 15-blades aperture? I have used this one once but unfortunately I had to return it.. :-(

Cheers

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Hi Steve,

Great advice. You sacrifice a certain look by stopping down - losing heavy on the smooth bokeh and circular highlights - but the in-focus area sharpens up slightly closed down on just about all lenses. As you said - some more than others. "Sharp wide open" is the holy grail. To get it you either have to really do your research, pay a lot of money or get lucky with a better-than-average copy of a lens. The nice thing is that fast vintage lenses will only gain value, so buying them for testing is never going to be a bad thing. As long as you can make a slick ebay listing you'll always at least get your money back - sometimes make a profit if you bought something that was undervalued or poorly represented. I just got done testing a Tomioka-made Rikenon. I've always heard they've got a unique look. I tested it 5.6, 4, 2.8, 2 and 1.4. Its a beautiful lens and does have a nice look, but I found the Olympus 50 1.4 (high serial number versions) and the earliest Pentax 50 1.4's to be sharper wide open. .

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

This might be because you aren't finding the right lenses. For example, Pentax makes so many different lenses with the same numbers on them it will make your head spin. They make the 135mm f2.5, but there is the takumar bayonet version, takumar bayonet super multi coated, and the smc pentax-m. The first two are garbage while the smc m mount is a gem. It's sharp even wide open. Also look into a smc pentax-m or pentax-a 50mm f1.4 which is also VERY sharp even wide open. People earlier suggested the super multi coated tak 50mm 1.4 but that lens has a dreamy sharp but not sharp look to it if that makes sense. The pentax-m or a is where its at though

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

I just discovered this thread and much like many others have previously posted, Thanks! This thread has been a nice web info tail to come across.

I wanted to post to rekindle the thread, maybe those who were previously posting so feverishly have fallen off the radar, but those who have a stake in this area of DSLR cinematography, definitely post. It helps, I'm sure the next person who falls upon this thread because they're stoked at the very concept of adapting modern DLSR bodies to use vintage glass will be even more pumped. Anyhow..

I moved to the DSLR video route (60D) for many reasons but the biggest is flexibility of over image control even with all the hoops. Owned a HMC40 and XH-A1. I'm researching old glass and looking for good long distance primes or small focal ranges that are reserved on the higher end... Reason being is that I'll be shooting water sports and need the reach. Instead of investing in expensive high end L Glass I like the look of the older stuff.

If anyone has any thoughts or good experiences with any specific lens please post. Its greatly greatly appreciated! Cheers!

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Hi Mike,

I'm shooting surfing and also currently looking for a longer vintage lens. Currently I'm shooting with a Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 with a 2x converter, and while i'm happy with the results (you can check some of my surf videos out here: Deltoid Productions/SURF on Vimeo, most of which were shot with this combo), I do find that the focus throw is a little too short to be able to get consistanly accurate focus over long distances.

I'm currently trawling eBay waiting on something like a Nikon 300mm f/4 MF to come up at a good price, hoping that it will give me the nice, precise, smooth manual focus feeling I'm looking for.

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

What's up Mike... Out of all the manual lenses i've collected for our 60D's (see my last post for the list) , i've gotten rid of everything except 2. My Nikkor 50 1.4 and Helios 44 i've kept since they are quite handy for the wedding work we do. Given that business is well, we've upgraded to more conventional lenses.

As for your specific need shooting outdoors, i believe the Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f3.5 (for nikon) is a great budget zoom lens and will serve you well. With the crop factor it is actually 105- 315 mm. It was a great lens for us, specially with its macro capabilities, but with the slow aperture,we were limited to using it only on outdoor shoots.

Kren

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Hey thanks for the replies! Super stoked on the feed back and will check out the suggestions/ do some homework. Glad business is going good, after reading this whole thread I realized I saved some money by not buying old canon glass at a garage sale. I'm going to also look into some of the shorter focal length primes.

Thanks again, I'll check in later!

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

It's great to see the updates to this old, but valuable thread. I started down the vintage lens road almost two years ago and today I still use many vintage lenes but not exclusively on my 60Ds.

The vintage lenses that I use the most are:
Zeiss Planar T 50mm 1.4
Zeiss Planar T 85mm 1.4
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 3.5
Nikon 35mm 1.4

I upgraded the Series 1 70-210 for the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS. I still like the colors better on the Series 1, but the Canon is a little faster and the image stabilization is amazning, but it should be since it's price is about $2200 more!

The Nikon 35mm 1.4 is the newest addition. I have a Sigma 20mm 1.8, Nikon 24mm 2.8 and Zeiss 50mm 1.4, but I was looking for something in between the 24mm and 50mm at f/1.4. The Nikon 35mm 1.4 is just what I was looking for. I considered the Sigma 30mm 1.4, but it will not work with the full frame sensor cameras, in case I decide to go that route.

Vintage lenses really helped me justify the cost of experimenting with DSLRs. Most of our weddings are exclusively DSLR and we still use many vintage lenses today.

Comparing the cost of fast L glass primes, going the vintage lens route has saved me thousands of dollars.

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Like an old lens, the thread has been dusted down for the modern era.

My previous faves:

o Takumar SMC 50mm f/1.4 - de-yellowed with a £10 uv bulb in 5 hours. A flawless lens for video IMO. If you don't de-yellow, yes you get a 'nice' yellow hue, but what is often not stated, you lose a stop of light.
o Takumar SMC 85mm f/1.9 - Another magnificent lens - beautiful colours
o Pentacon 135mm f/2.8 15 blade - AKA the bokeh monster with good reason. Sharp lens. Preset aperture - no clicks! I wish all my manual lenses were de-clicked.
o Vivitar series 1 28mm f/1.9 - Not a flawless lens - fluffy wide open. Definite look. Cheap, fast, good, choose any two of the above!
o Porst 135 f/1.8 - Not a stellar lens at, all but usable wide open indoors with a bit of care. Crazy fun!
o Takumar 300mm f/4 - "The Beast" - doubles up as a weapon. Only a bit of CA spoils it.

I've obtained a couple more beauties since the bygone days when the thread started, and I was still a young man:

o Takumar SMC 100mm f/4 1:2 macro - this is one sharp lens. Extremely sharp, with hardly a flaw. Beautiful bokeh
o Vivitar 28mm f/2 - better than the f/1.9 mentioned above, and not a series one, but it's much sharper wide open without the halation in the f/1.9. This one actually is cheap, fast and good. There are tons of these - Vivitar is just a badge. Everyone should have one because they're cheap. See this great resource:

Great Vivitar 28mm Bestiary

Mine is a K12. It's on the camera a lot because it's my main normal lens (aps-c) when I need to extract the most out of the ambient light.

The great thing about all these lenses is that they have an almost intangible individual character. Some more than others. Some just behave as well as many modern lenses at their special tasks. It's a very complex subject, but they each have their own levels curve which varies accross the spectrum. Not to mention the bokeh and flare characteristics

You can analyse their performance characteristics on paper and dismiss them, but there is undeniably something pleasing to the eye in some vintage primes. Just like modern lenses, many are crap.

I love working with Canon L glass with all that contrast and tone purity - it's like having a blank canvas and you get to set the stage in an empty room so to speak. With vintage primes, the stage is set to a degree.

It reminds me a bit of the audio production world where in every 24/192 digital studio, you'll find many a plug-in to bring back the distortion characteristics of an old amp or tape deck because it just sounds good.

Ramble over.

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Mark,

To get the most out of your 70-200L, go into the camera menu, ensure that Peripheral Illumination Correction is Enabled, and check that the lens data is registered in the camera. That lens (and the 100L Macro) was not registered in my 5D. To register it, connect the camera to the computer with USB, start the EOS Utility, go into the application and click the check box for your lens. You can also enable it for use with the 1.4x and 2.0x extenders.

This is an important advantage that Canon lenses give when shooting DLSRs for those who shoot wide open. PIC processing happens before S-shaping and 8-bit rounding. It ensures that you get all eight bits across the frame when you go into post.

IMO, this is an unappreciated difference between Canon and vintage lenses. If you shoot at f/4 or tighter, it's no big deal. If you shoot wide open, it matters.

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

It's a good point Jon, and I'm glad you raised it, but it might be worth adding that this is less of an issue on APS-C bodies because the sensor occupies a smaller proportion of the image circle of these lenses designed for the 35mm frame.

I don't see much vignetting on the 550d when shooting wide open with the Takumar 50mm f/1.4 for example. It's there, but it would be worse on the 5d and other full frame bodies.

It's true if you fix what vignetting is there in post, you don't get the same dynamic range in the corners as you would doing it in camera with PIC.

In practice, I don't find this to be an issue for my stuff, and I tend to only use the vintage primes for wide open shooting. I would argue that the kind of people this will matter to aren't going to be using vintage primes on an APS-C body anyway.

If you're going to stop down, it would be more convenient to stick to the f/2.8 zooms. But Canon don't support lens data for any 3rd party lens, so your point should really be applied to any lens for which PIC data cannot be registered.

It is my hope that there is progress with this in ML one day. So far they have been unable to fake lens data, but if they ever manage it, maybe we can open up support for user-defined PIC curves. It also seems this is the key for faking EXIF - would be very usefulf for the manual crowd, as we don't get to see what aperture was used in the EXIF.

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

True, it's much worse on FF bodies.

For instance, the Zeiss 35/2 and 28/2 lose over three stops in the corners on the 5D. They still lose about a stop and a half on crop cams. Effectively, that takes you from 8 bits to 6.5 bits in the corners on ASP-C. It's not quite that straightforward though, as the s-curve makes this non-linear.

Where I notice it the most is when there is a flat wall in the background. For DSLRs you tend to see circle contours in this situation - especially if there was some post work done.

My son and I did some tests and found that even when stopped down on Canon lenses, enabling PIC gave a flatter result than when PIC was off.

One place where you might want to turn off PIC would be when you're shooting a portrait-style shot where you want to focus on the subject, and you have practical lights in one or more corners. In that case, it keeps the subject bright and acts like a grad ND.

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

A stop and a half sounded like a lot to me. That's quite a lot of vignetting, and my eyes tell me I'm not seeing that, but of course I could be wrong.

I did a quick and dirty test on the Takumar 50mm pointed to a flat white wall as follows:

1. Set up live view in manual mode so that the ML % spot meter shows 50% with the lens wide open
2. Click down one stop, center spot goes to 35%
3. Click back to wide open, move the spot meter to the bottom left, spot meter goes to 41%

Without spending the time converting the linear percentage to actual f-stops, unless there is a glaring flaw in my test, it seems clear I'm seeing a fair bit less than one stop, rather than the one and a half you get with your Zeiss lenses. I did the test on the Vivitar 28mm f/2 and the Porst 135mm f/1.8 and got similar results. (Edit: perhaps worth adding that I repeated the test stopped down to f/5.6 and saw that vignetting was down to 1 or 2%)

But the visible effect I would describe is that you really have to look for the vignetting, because the visible darkening, which is very slight, only encroaches about 5% in from the corners, whereas on a full frame body, you would see visible darkening more like 25% in from the corners.

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Here are the ZE 35/2 and ZE 28/2 (rollover) wide open. The white rectangle shows APS-C.

Zeiss 35mm f/2.0 Distagon T* ZE Lens Vignetting Test Results

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Thanks for that confirmation, not that it was needed, because I know you don't make things up Jon. I hope my post didn't sound like it questioned your findings on your Zeiss lenses, as I was only referring to what I see with mine.

Incidentally, since they don't have the Takumar 50mm f/1.4 I thought it would be interesting to compare two of the 50mm f/1.4 lenses they do have, which seem to confirm that the findings of my rudimentary test are at least plausible, as the optical design is similar between these two and the Takumar:

Zeiss 50mm f/1.4 Planar T* ZE Lens Vignetting Test Results

As you can see, less than one stop in the corners, which is what I tend to imagine I see on most of my primes. So it's clear there is not one story on vintage primes.

The other interesting thing your post confirms for me is how bad the problem is on FF compared to APS-C.

One more thing, to highlight what I was saying before, this PIC discussion really isn't about Canon vs vintage, it's about Canon vs everything. For example, the Tokina 11-16mm vs the Canon EF 10-22mm comparison shows that they both have vignetting (although the Tokina is much better even though it's a faster lens), but as you point out, only the Canon can benefit from PIC:

Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro DX Lens Vignetting Test Results

As far as I'm aware the Tokina is one of the most popular lenses for video on APS-C Canon DSLRs

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

You're exactly right. This affects all non-Canon lenses. As you've experienced, a good full-frame 50mm on an APS-C cam won't have much vignetting, but APS-C lenses might.

On photos, I typically, use Canon's DPP software to process RAW images, but digging into the PIC thing, I realized that it might be better to go straight to Photoshop to convert images from non-Canon lenses. Photoshop has lens correction data for many non-Canon lenses, including not just vignetting correction, but barrel/pincushion distortion correction too.

Too bad Adobe's lens corrections aren't inside our cameras when shooting video. :)

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

i'm having a bit of a problem with my t2i and my vintage lenses. Right now I have an Auto Chinon 35mm attached and when I film something, it looks good on the view finder but when I get it back to my computer the shot looks over exposed..

I am not sure what is causing this.. Probably the operator..ha.

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Hi Jon,

Thanks for the tip. The Peripheral Illumination Correction is enabled. The 70-200L looks great, but there is just something about that old Series 1 lens that looks incredible. If the Series 1 just had the great IS of the Canon L it would be the best of both worlds. ;-)

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Hi Terry,

It took me a while to get adjusted to the LCD of the T2i, or for that matter the 60D. I usually over exposed at first. When shooting with video cameras I always used manual exposure and relied on the Zebras to get good exposure. With DSLRs I found that using the built in exposure meter helped. It's not perfect, but it gets you in the ball park.

Have you tried using the exposure meter? It's been a while since I have shot with the T2i, but if I remember correctly, the exposure meter was pretty accurate with vintage lenses. On my 60D it is not accurate. I under expose the meter in the -2.5 to -3 range to get good exposure with vintage lenses.

Another thing I noticed was that shooting outside makes getting proper exposure a challenge. I added a hood to the 60D which greatly helps with exposure outdoors.

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Hey Mark,

I adjusted the exposure back to -2.5 and it did the job!

Thank you sir!

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Hi Terry,

I'm glad that worked for you. You are welcome.

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

Thanks for all the input. Still going through it and doing research. Just wanted to post to say thanks!

Re: Top 4 vintage lenses
 

HI Joel, I have 3 canon fd lenses all from ebay the 3 cost less than £100,and all are pinsharp,must be my best buy yet. I have a link.The test shots on vimeo don't show as sharp as on my tv.

.