|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 9th, 2009, 11:59 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 33
|
New 5D2 Timelapse and 30p Video: "Timescapes Learning to Fly"
Just some new stuff I've shot on the 5D2 DSLR over the last couple months...
I LOVE this camera. The shots I'm doing at ISO 3200 are cleaner than my ISO 800 images on my old Rebel XT. Most of these were done with the EF 24 f/1.4. The video was shot with a cheapy Sigma 28-300, which has the advantage of having an iris ring to control the f/stop. I got a nikon>eos adapter on ebay for like 40 bucks, and it seems to work fine. Here is a video showing the little custom dolly I made to shoot the timelapse: |
April 9th, 2009, 12:02 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Riverside, Ca
Posts: 307
|
Absolutely awesome.
Love the footage, love the technique, love the location. Good Show! |
April 9th, 2009, 12:59 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 26
|
That's some really beautiful work... could you explain a bit more about the technical details of the timelapse stuff, how you did it, etc?
Is there a way for the camera to automatically fire every x seconds for timelapse stuff, or did you have to press the shutter manually? And how did you do the panning of the camera during the timelapse sequences? (Edit: Sorry re: panning - I see you've already posted about your Timelapse Dolly Project on vimeo) Congrats again, it's really nice stuff.. |
April 9th, 2009, 01:32 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California USA
Posts: 576
|
Tom,
Fantastic video, well done! Sorry, but I have a ton of questions!! Someone on Vimeo asked you about the moving shots taken from your car and your answer was just that you shot at 1/2". Could you explain what you meant? I assume you moved your vehicle at a constant (slow) speed and shot once every 1/2 a second, right? If so, how did you estimate the right speed and distance for the shot? Were you shooting RAW or JPG for your shots? How did you handle the changing exposure (night to day and vice-versa)? How did you color balance? For the star-field shots, how often did you fire the shutter? And, as asked above, did you fire the shutter manually, or do you have an intervalometer? I have the Canon TC-80N3 which allows me to set the number of shots desired and the time between them. I've not tried timelapse photography/video, but your video has inspired me! My weekend begins on Sunday... looks like it's going to be a long night! :-) Julian |
April 9th, 2009, 01:35 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 106
|
Just awesome stuff, Thomas!
I downloaded the larger file for an even more majestic effect, if that's possible. Makes me want to take a vacation in the desert. Great work. |
April 9th, 2009, 02:19 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 181
|
I love it :)
I'd try to stabilize the car shots a bit though. They seem a bit wobbly. |
April 9th, 2009, 03:28 PM | #7 | ||||||
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
hope this helps. |
||||||
April 9th, 2009, 03:36 PM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Is this right? The exposure duration can't be longer than the shooting interval.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
April 9th, 2009, 03:49 PM | #9 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
Be careful though. Safety should always be your first priority. Don't try to push the car unless A) You're in a closed area with no other traffic B) The ground is perfectly level (or else you might end up in a runaway car situation or worse, being run over by your own car) C) You don't suffer from any back problems or other health issues. |
|
April 9th, 2009, 03:50 PM | #10 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
|
|
April 9th, 2009, 03:51 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 33
|
in other words, the camera exposes for 20s, then takes a 4s break, then exposes for 20s, etc. that way i can view a 2s "review" of the shot on the LCD, which is always nice to watch in progress.
|
April 9th, 2009, 03:57 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 949
|
|
April 9th, 2009, 04:04 PM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 181
|
Tom:
Have you ever tried to get a hold of one of those crazy ND filters that schneider kreuznach manufactures for industrial applications? I've always wanted one. There is a 10 stop ND filter that would be a dream to shoot daylight timelapse. Stacking a couple should allow you to get rid of people for daylight timelapse in parks and urban environments. |
April 9th, 2009, 04:20 PM | #14 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Tom:
So not knowing much about still photography, I did my first photo testing with the same intervalmeter a few weeks back. Your work gives me new inspiration. I had come to the conclusion it didn't makes sense to shoot any higher than the lowest Jpeg level, because my hd out put wasn't going to be any higher. Can you expound on your reasoning to choose a higher resolution like sraw 1 for your still series. By the way, for those using Vegas, you can rapidly create a still sequence on your time line by isolating your consecutively numbered photos in a folder, and importing them into Vegas. What you do is select the first picture in the sequence, then check a box in the window asking Vegas to import as a sequence. You will endup with the sequence in your media files appearing as a single file that you can add to the time line from there. Crop and adjust as you see fit from there.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
April 9th, 2009, 04:46 PM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 181
|
Chris:
Off the top of my head, my main reasons to shoot bigger than delivery format would be: A) To allow for better quality, those extra pixels mean a lot when doing color correction, masking and such. B) Reframing, zooming, panning, etc... C) Stabilizing footage without losing resolution. My .02 :) |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|