GL2 or PD170

Bob Harotunian · December 24th, 2003, 12:47 PM

Thanks Federico, no offense taken. I've also defended my GL2s on many occasions since most people in the wedding industry are hard-core Sony users. But, I have no particular allegiances except to the client and if I can get a better but affordable picture with a Sony, Pannie or Canon, I'm interested.
Happy holidays to you also.

Ben Lynn · December 24th, 2003, 02:37 PM

I love my GL2 but I have to tell you that yes the 150 has a jaw dropping advantage when it comes to low light. Save the GL2 for controlled environments and for weddings grap the 2000/150.

Ben Lynn

Tom Voigt · December 28th, 2003, 04:24 PM

When you are in low light with the GL2 put it in frame mode and use 1/30 sec shutter. The motion signature looks quite normal.

This should narrow the Sony's advantage in low light.

-Tom-

December 28th, 2003, 04:24 PM	#18
Tom Voigt Regular Crew Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 92	One more stop out of the GL2 When you are in low light with the GL2 put it in frame mode and use 1/30 sec shutter. The motion signature looks quite normal. This should narrow the Sony's advantage in low light. -Tom-

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

December 24th, 2003, 12:47 PM	#16
Bob Harotunian Major Player Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Somerville, MA Posts: 360	Thanks Federico, no offense taken. I've also defended my GL2s on many occasions since most people in the wedding industry are hard-core Sony users. But, I have no particular allegiances except to the client and if I can get a better but affordable picture with a Sony, Pannie or Canon, I'm interested. Happy holidays to you also.

December 24th, 2003, 02:37 PM	#17
Ben Lynn Major Player Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Bloomington, IL Posts: 636	I love my GL2 but I have to tell you that yes the 150 has a jaw dropping advantage when it comes to low light. Save the GL2 for controlled environments and for weddings grap the 2000/150. Ben Lynn