|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 26th, 2007, 01:04 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 440
|
HV20 cine mode more dynamic range?
Here's a 1:1 crop of 1440x1080 video stream, Cine 1/48 5.6 and AV 1/70 F5.6. This is a pretty typical result when shooting cine, getting tons more information where in AV or Shutter mode the highlights blow out more, plus gradations such as the window near the top of the frame look superb with cine mode.
Sample image |
April 26th, 2007, 01:15 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 30
|
Very clear example, Wes. Doesn't this make you wonder about hidden parameters in the camera that Canon didn't care to expose at this price
level. I mean, its been said cine mode is changing things like gamma that are user tweakable on the A1. Jim |
April 26th, 2007, 01:17 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 30
|
Wes, very interesting. I can see the blown highlights but I am also noticing a softness issue on the cine. Any comments?
I want to look at this more myself. Tim |
April 26th, 2007, 01:19 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK
Posts: 321
|
|
April 26th, 2007, 01:35 PM | #5 |
Tourist
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1
|
I think the Cine "softness" issue is simply a lack of in-camera sharpening in Cine mode.
This is a good thing! You can always sharpen in post. But you can't remove sharpening artifacts from a sharpened image. Fergus's Cine test frame with medium sharpening, (http://dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=92468) looks about equivalent to the Auto frame (minus the blown out hilites), to my eye. Mark |
April 26th, 2007, 01:54 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 30
|
Boy am I going to start digging into this. Very interesting. Looks like cine a post processing is the big ticket. Hmmmm...
|
April 26th, 2007, 02:08 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 440
|
I locked the exposure at pretty much the auto setting and tried to get zebras looking similar at 70%. When I turned down exposure in AV mode so that the whites weren't so blown the rest of the trailer became much darker. The cine in general just gets more info in the darks and whites, is it just a higher contrast setting for the other modes I wonder. The little bit of contrast control Canon gives you in the effects doesn't do much.
|
April 26th, 2007, 03:42 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK
Posts: 321
|
Yes I agree with you Wes - Im starting to think that the cine mode could be very useful indeed
|
April 26th, 2007, 03:47 PM | #9 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
Thanks.
__________________
Michael Rosenberger Sure I'll shoot your wedding, for two million dollars. |
|
April 26th, 2007, 03:56 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somerville, NJ
Posts: 304
|
Michael,
It has 70% Zebra, 100% Zebra and Peak. How to use them properly in Cine mode I don't know as its mostly automatic. |
April 26th, 2007, 10:13 PM | #11 |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 11
|
Zebra - how to enable it
Neither ZEBRA nor PEAKING is listed in the DV20 manual's index. They are described under "assist functions" on page 43. After you select one of the functions, it is toggled by the FOCUS ASSIST button on the LCD display.
That is, FOCUS ASSIST zooms in on the image -- otherwise the zebra/peaking is 'on' and the image is normal size. "Peaking" is edge enhancement which artificially sharpens edges to help you focus. Last edited by Neil Groundwater; April 27th, 2007 at 09:22 AM. Reason: added 2nd paragraph for clarity |
April 27th, 2007, 01:49 AM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Posts: 143
|
Thank you very much for the information and references. I use 80 IRE (I would assume the % corresponds) normally for skin, setting the exposure to where the zebra crawl just disappears on the hottest spots. Have to find out where 70% falls in that scheme. In any case, that is a surprising feature for such an inexpensive camera. Still figuring out what other functional gems will turn up. Time to RTFM, methinks.
__________________
Michael Rosenberger Sure I'll shoot your wedding, for two million dollars. Last edited by Michael Rosenberger; April 27th, 2007 at 01:57 AM. Reason: added thought. |
April 27th, 2007, 09:52 AM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Michael:
I'm finding usin 100 on the zebra setting and backing exposure off from there to eliminate seems to work pretty well to give you best exposure in the shadows too...
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
April 27th, 2007, 10:02 AM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 293
|
Wes - thanks for your comparison. For me CineMode looks too soft and flat. That and the fact you can't lock a shutter have caused me to shy away from using it. You are right about the highlight issue though. My solution right now is to turn brightness and contrast down one notch -1 (and color depth +1 , sharpness 0) while shooting Tv mode. May revisit CineMode in the future but the idea my shutter could fluctuate makes me very wary of using it.
|
April 27th, 2007, 11:48 AM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rockledge, Florida
Posts: 351
|
This might have been mentioned before but Cinema mode seems to try and keep the shutter at 1/48. It's only when you move your aperter to +1 or -1 that it seems to change your shutter.
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|