Depth of Field and Zoom

Aaron Koolen · August 2nd, 2004, 05:19 AM

Jay, I wasn't getting at Jeff at all. I got the feeling Barry wasn't understanding what Jeff was saying - if I was wrong Barry I apologise.

It seemed obvious to me that it wasn't the actual chip that changed the FOV, but the focal length, whereas Barry was talking about the final output looking like it had a different FOV if you changed the chip - which is also true.

I assumed that people were talking about the same thing, just different terminology and getting confused.

Aaron

Jay Gladwell · August 2nd, 2004, 05:28 AM

Aaron, thanks for the clarification. That's much appreciated. Sometimes, depending on the length of the thread and who says what, it gets difficult to follow... sometimes the "thread" becomes a bit frayed.

Jay

August 2nd, 2004, 05:19 AM	#31
Aaron Koolen Trustee Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Auckland, New Zealand Posts: 1,727	Jay, I wasn't getting at Jeff at all. I got the feeling Barry wasn't understanding what Jeff was saying - if I was wrong Barry I apologise. It seemed obvious to me that it wasn't the actual chip that changed the FOV, but the focal length, whereas Barry was talking about the final output looking like it had a different FOV if you changed the chip - which is also true. I assumed that people were talking about the same thing, just different terminology and getting confused. Aaron __________________ My Website Meat Free Media

August 2nd, 2004, 05:28 AM	#32
Jay Gladwell Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 1,244	Aaron, thanks for the clarification. That's much appreciated. Sometimes, depending on the length of the thread and who says what, it gets difficult to follow... sometimes the "thread" becomes a bit frayed. Jay