|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 14th, 2004, 02:36 PM | #16 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,727
|
Thing is, as much as I hate Sony cameras, I wouldn't be surprised if they made the 4:3 option on their upcoming HS camera (I assume that it will have a 4:3 option) use 1/3" of the chip or at least better than this canon does. I mean, they've taken a 1/3" 4:3 chip and made it something like 1/4" in 4:3.
Aaron |
August 1st, 2004, 07:26 AM | #17 |
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
Nick: keep in mind that 60i is NOT 60 **FULL** frames per second.
It is 60 HALF frames (or fields) per second. So you will at least loose 50% vertical resolution if you want to play it back two times as slowly. Now programs like twixtor can perhaps do a very good job on interpolation to make the loss minimal as possible, but it is still there. Whether such a thing would be acceptable to you depends on your budget (which program you can use), personal preference, type of shot, output format etc. etc.
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
August 1st, 2004, 11:50 AM | #18 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 1,427
|
Rob yeah, I thought that's what I was saying, Twixtor (to the best of my knowledge is like magic bullet in the since that it merges interlaced lines and then gived you 60 frames in stead of 60 half frames. 60 progressive frames would be 2.5 times longer then 24 progressive frames. so when played back with 24p footage would resemble slow mo, I believe they used that effect on November, it turned out ok but not quite varicam slowmo.
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|