|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 16th, 2004, 03:17 PM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 156
|
Why complain about the WA view on the XL2?
In 16x9 mode, you will have a wider angle of view than the DVX100a in 4x3 mode anyway, correct?
|
|
|
|
August 16th, 2004, 06:22 PM
|
#2 |
|
Obstreperous Rex
|
Only if you're using the 3x wide angle lens. Otherwise, the DVX has a wider angle of view. The DVX is 32.5mm to 325mm (in 35mm terms). Compare the XL2 fields of view with various lenses using my lens chart at http://www.dvinfo.net/canonxl2/articles/article04.php.
|
|
|
|
|
August 16th, 2004, 06:23 PM
|
#3 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Saguenay, Québec, Canada
Posts: 1,051
|
No, since it use a 1/3 CCD, same as the XL1, you will have about the same angle of view as the XL1, and even less wide is 4:3.
__________________
Jean-Philippe Archibald http://www.jparchibald.com - http://www.vimeo.com/jparchib |
|
|
|
|
August 17th, 2004, 07:45 AM
|
#4 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 156
|
XL2 WA
So the DVX is 32.5mm in 4x3?
|
|
|
|
|
August 17th, 2004, 07:50 AM
|
#5 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Saguenay, Québec, Canada
Posts: 1,051
|
Re: XL2 WA
<<<-- Originally posted by Ed Szarleta : So the DVX is 32.5mm in 4x3? -->>>
Yes, and the XL2 is : With the 20X lesn 42.3 - 846mm in 16X9 and 51.8 - 1036mm in 4X3 With the 3X lens 26.6 - 79.8mm in 16X9 and 32.6 - 97.8mm in 4X3
__________________
Jean-Philippe Archibald http://www.jparchibald.com - http://www.vimeo.com/jparchib |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
