XL2 vs. DVX100A 24p 16:9 Cinegamma footage posted

Antoine Fabi · October 6th, 2004, 07:22 PM

It would be very usefull to compare the XL2 and the DVX100A (with anamorphic adapter) with a res chart.

We could really see if this is about sharpness or resolution.

The XL2 seems to be virtually noise free, extremely clean.

David Mintzer · October 7th, 2004, 01:13 PM

The only major difference I saw was the XL2 had much more saturated greens (particularly the grass) Beyond that, is it worth another two grand (or whatever the price difference is), in my mind no.

David Lach · October 7th, 2004, 03:16 PM

Right, and I suppose interchangeable lenses, better resolution and true 16:9 are not major differences.

The saturation of colors means absolutely nothing by itself since this is menu tweakable (R/G/B independant on the XL2).

Chris Hurd · October 7th, 2004, 03:26 PM

To some folks, those differences are immaterial... to others, they really matter. There is no "one right camera for everybody."

Chris Hurd · October 7th, 2004, 09:11 PM

Heh. Actually that's a pretty good analogy there.

October 7th, 2004, 03:26 PM	#34
Chris Hurd Obstreperous Rex Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: San Marcos, TX Posts: 27,365 Images: 513	To some folks, those differences are immaterial... to others, they really matter. There is no "one right camera for everybody." __________________ CH Search DV Info Net \| 20 years of DVi \| ...Tuesday is Soylent Green Day!

October 7th, 2004, 09:11 PM	#35
Chris Hurd Obstreperous Rex Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: San Marcos, TX Posts: 27,365 Images: 513	Heh. Actually that's a pretty good analogy there. __________________ CH Search DV Info Net \| 20 years of DVi \| ...Tuesday is Soylent Green Day!

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

October 6th, 2004, 07:22 PM	#31
Antoine Fabi Regular Crew Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: sherbrooke (Quebec) Canada Posts: 108	It would be very usefull to compare the XL2 and the DVX100A (with anamorphic adapter) with a res chart. We could really see if this is about sharpness or resolution. The XL2 seems to be virtually noise free, extremely clean.

October 7th, 2004, 01:13 PM	#32
David Mintzer Rextilleon Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Pleasantville, NY Posts: 520	The only major difference I saw was the XL2 had much more saturated greens (particularly the grass) Beyond that, is it worth another two grand (or whatever the price difference is), in my mind no.

October 7th, 2004, 03:16 PM	#33
David Lach Major Player Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Montreal, QC, Canada Posts: 570	Right, and I suppose interchangeable lenses, better resolution and true 16:9 are not major differences. The saturation of colors means absolutely nothing by itself since this is menu tweakable (R/G/B independant on the XL2).