shooting file footage at DVinfo.net

Don Meers · May 31st, 2005, 11:02 PM

I live in Pal land and have been asked to shoot some file footage for a friend who owns a production company in USA.The question is should I shoot Interlaced or Progressive as im not sure the final medium.Which is the most future proofed medium?

Rob Lohman · June 1st, 2005, 06:00 AM

I'm not sure what "file" footage is, but shouldn't the decision for progressive
or interlaced be the "clients" choice? It it is progressive then it can be easily
converted into NTSC 24p. Going to 29.97 fps either in progressive or interlaced
can result in bad looking footage (depends on the program doing the conversion).

Perhaps some test conversions is a good thing to do?

Dan Mumford · June 1st, 2005, 10:09 AM

Don,

I'd call your friend and ask which format would suit him/her. There are programs which convert from one format to another but not sure if it wiil work between PAL and NTSC. In the mean time, maybe you could explain to Rob what file footage is.

Dan

Don Meers · June 1st, 2005, 02:34 PM

File footage/stock footage.
previously-shot footage or film of common elements or scenes, such as canyons or deserts in the American West, or travelogue shots (eg, skylines, airplane takeoffs/landings, famous places, etc.) that are kept in a film archive and used to fill in portions of a production, thereby saving the time of reshooting similar scenes over and over.

Rob Lohman · June 2nd, 2005, 03:59 AM

I thought that was "stock" footage. Oh well, if you still need to shoot that
then ask your friend what he would like.

Good luck!

Dan Mumford · June 2nd, 2005, 05:21 AM

Same difference. Newspapers and television newsrooms keep "file photos" or "file footage" to go with stories they print/broadcast. Say they were doing a story on the crash of a 747. If they don't have actual footage of the event, they'll use file footage of a 747. It could be sitting at an airport, or in the air, but it just gives a visual aid to the story. The same with politicians, celebrities, or geographic locations.

Dan

May 31st, 2005, 11:02 PM	#1
Don Meers Regular Crew Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 63	shooting file footage I live in Pal land and have been asked to shoot some file footage for a friend who owns a production company in USA.The question is should I shoot Interlaced or Progressive as im not sure the final medium.Which is the most future proofed medium?

June 1st, 2005, 06:00 AM	#2
Rob Lohman RED Code Chef Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Holland Posts: 12,514	I'm not sure what "file" footage is, but shouldn't the decision for progressive or interlaced be the "clients" choice? It it is progressive then it can be easily converted into NTSC 24p. Going to 29.97 fps either in progressive or interlaced can result in bad looking footage (depends on the program doing the conversion). Perhaps some test conversions is a good thing to do? __________________ Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge \| Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers \| Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors

June 1st, 2005, 10:09 AM	#3
Dan Mumford Regular Crew Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Daytona Beach, Florida Posts: 99	Don, I'd call your friend and ask which format would suit him/her. There are programs which convert from one format to another but not sure if it wiil work between PAL and NTSC. In the mean time, maybe you could explain to Rob what file footage is. Dan __________________ Wow! That thing must have cost an arm and a leg! - - - It did! I used to have three of each.

June 2nd, 2005, 03:59 AM	#5
Rob Lohman RED Code Chef Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Holland Posts: 12,514	I thought that was "stock" footage. Oh well, if you still need to shoot that then ask your friend what he would like. Good luck! __________________ Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge \| Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers \| Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors

June 2nd, 2005, 05:21 AM	#6
Dan Mumford Regular Crew Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Daytona Beach, Florida Posts: 99	Same difference. Newspapers and television newsrooms keep "file photos" or "file footage" to go with stories they print/broadcast. Say they were doing a story on the crash of a 747. If they don't have actual footage of the event, they'll use file footage of a 747. It could be sitting at an airport, or in the air, but it just gives a visual aid to the story. The same with politicians, celebrities, or geographic locations. Dan __________________ Wow! That thing must have cost an arm and a leg! - - - It did! I used to have three of each.

June 1st, 2005, 02:34 PM	#4
Don Meers Regular Crew Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 63	File footage/stock footage. previously-shot footage or film of common elements or scenes, such as canyons or deserts in the American West, or travelogue shots (eg, skylines, airplane takeoffs/landings, famous places, etc.) that are kept in a film archive and used to fill in portions of a production, thereby saving the time of reshooting similar scenes over and over.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search