|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 3rd, 2005, 11:27 PM | #16 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
|
final cut
yes, I am looking at Final Cut Pro full-screen preview, and it doesn't have a high quality picture, its not sharp. The picture is good when I am looking at it smaller.
It was the same even after I exported it to dvd. and played it on the computer. Thank you |
August 4th, 2005, 06:48 AM | #17 | |
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,244
|
Quote:
Jay |
|
August 4th, 2005, 07:30 AM | #18 | |
Wrangler
|
Quote:
From personal experience, I fed 16:9 60i footage straight out of the s-video connection on the XL-2 into my 65" HDTV. When viewed from the normal viewing distance, the picture was gorgeous. That was with no presets active while taping the material, just straight out of the box settings. There have been others that have come through here in the past that talk about less than expected image quality from the XL-2. I am wondering if in fact, some XL-2 cameras are performing better than others straight out of the box. We do need to allow for that possibility rather than straight out blame the camera operator. |
|
August 4th, 2005, 05:24 PM | #19 |
suspended -- contact admin
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 214
|
The thing that holds back the Canon XL-2 is its inability to shoot 60 progressive frames per secound. The Canon XL-2 can only shoot 30 progressive frames per secound.
|
August 4th, 2005, 05:37 PM | #20 |
suspended -- contact admin
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 214
|
Why don't you go to Best Buy and hook up your XL-2 to a Sony XBR television with digital reality creation that upconverts 480i to 960i for a 4 times greater pixel density ?
|
August 4th, 2005, 05:55 PM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 45
|
i have a 65 inch mitsu and even on interlaced (in 24p) the resolution looks better than most DVDs
|
August 4th, 2005, 07:01 PM | #22 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
|
Image quality
Hi eveyone, thank you for your help
I finally got a better image with my xl2, its really good when I play it directly to TV. But when I capture it, its not that good. It is loosing quality and I can't watch it in big picture. thank you |
August 5th, 2005, 05:46 AM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 917
|
Perhaps you are simply having capture problems.
How familiar are you with your NLE's? I know adobe premiere has a slight down-res in the preview window. That's why it's a preview window... Matt |
August 5th, 2005, 06:38 AM | #24 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
|
Capture Issues
Hi friends, thank you all, I finally get a better picture with my xl2.
And about the capturing, using final cut pro, after I capture, when I export it normaly NTSC 48khz evendough I capture them in NTSC 48khz, it doesn't have a good quality. but, if I convert it to HD while exporting, the picture is good. Is it normal to be that way? thank you |
August 5th, 2005, 01:25 PM | #25 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Asmara, Eritrea
Posts: 9
|
Cupturing issues
Hi, Kalil,
It is nice to hear you are getting good pictures from your XL2. If that is so, you should not get a bad cupture ... I guess! And the quality of the exported picture also should be the same. So, can you clarify it more. May be I can help - though I work on PAL. Makonnen |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|