|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 18th, 2004, 03:49 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 17
|
xl1s - was it a mistake?
so far for this price the only thing going for this camera is it's lens changing ability...
negative points: - bad in low light - gain jumps from 0 to 6dB - no xlr inputs - no LCD - focusing problems - not very sharp image - so so resolution - very poor headphone jack.. i'm really considering selling it... but i don't want to lose mone ... someone please, give me reasons to not sell it... help! |
February 18th, 2004, 04:26 PM | #2 |
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
I'm sorry to say this, but I don't think you did a very good job
of looking at the camera before buying, because you would've known it didn't have a flipout LCD screen or XLR inputs. Secondly, it is a prosumer camera, don't expect too much from the auto controls: 1. all camera's are bad in low-light. The XL1S is actually pretty acceptable. But there are better camera's for that. If you go full manual you can get a pretty decent performance. Research before buying might have pointed you to a better low-light camera 2. then you are running the camera in auto mode or left the gain on auto. I have my gain always at -3 db in full manual and it never jumps 3. that is correct. There are several appliances you can get to get XLR in on the XL1 range. As said, research had told you this before buying 4. same as 3, seperate screen available 5. mostly only during zooming and on some low contrast stuff. Run it in manual focus mode (almost always better anyway) 6. that depends on how you are shooting. In interlaced it shoot be pretty sharp and otherwise you can always turn up the sharpness a notch under custom presets. Canon's have a tendency to be a bit softer. Most people like those for it usually is closer to film than video 7. that also depends on what mode you are using. If you shoot at interlaced with a 1/60 shutter at f5.6 you'll have very good resolution. Again, with research you could've seen how much pixels are on the CCD's if that is your concern 8. what's bad about the headphone jack? That's the first time I've heard someone complain about it
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
February 18th, 2004, 05:02 PM | #3 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 17
|
i knew the camera didn't have XLR inputs or LCD when I bought it... I just never thought they would be so handy.
as for the gain thing i meant that on the controls there is no setting between 0 and 6. about the headphone jack... i've heard many people complain.. the sound that comes out is just too soft.. not loud enough |
February 18th, 2004, 05:06 PM | #4 |
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
The headphone issue if probably due to not matching the sensitivity and impedance properly. I have no problems with the Sony headphones I use. Canon makes several adapters to add XLR connections.
__________________
Jeff Donald Carpe Diem Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Where to Buy? From the best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
February 18th, 2004, 07:12 PM | #5 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
You know, over the years I've come to appreciate the XL1 and XL1s, especially with the "rich" footage they capture.
|
February 19th, 2004, 12:34 AM | #6 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
Frank and all,
I've shot several shorts and a feature (plus oen feature we shelved): 1. SKYE FALLING (2001) 2. PUSH/PULL (2003) 3. A REMINDER (2004) 4. SUZY'S OUT (2004) These are movies, except SUZY, that have gotten into film fests and on movie screens in digital format. It always looked killer, even when we shot stuff in dim lighting. The XL-1, which I still use a friend's (I sold mine to buy the JVC HDV camera), is a GREAT camera! That doesn't include other things I've done, like TV shows, documentary stuff, etc. heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
February 19th, 2004, 01:11 PM | #7 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
As much as I admire the DVX-100 for its many great features and great resolution, I'm still convinced that the XL1 delivers the most pleasing skin tones. This is not something that can be detailed in a technical spec or quantified simply as a "warmer" color palette, it's an entirely subjective thing. Most video cameras (including Panasonic and Sony) tend to "gray out" faces when underexposing, the Canon seems to retain the color better.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
February 19th, 2004, 01:12 PM | #8 |
Air China Pilot
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 2,389
|
The Mini35 adaptors and other extensions give the XL1/S new life. Take a look at Oliver's superb film:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...threadid=21567
__________________
-- Visit http://www.KeithLoh.com | stuff about living in Vancouver | My Flickr photo gallery |
February 19th, 2004, 01:32 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 173
|
you forgot the best trait of all. people in public will walk up to you when you're shooting and say, "wow that's a nice camera!" haha.
|
February 19th, 2004, 02:03 PM | #10 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston, MA (travel frequently)
Posts: 837
|
Hi Alfonso,
For what it is worth, I really don't have any issue with the sensitivity on the Xl1S. Compared to the cameras I have used previously, it is a treat to use. Think of the Xl1S as having an ISO rating of around 320 ISO. On that note, I shoot in -3db most of the time. I'm not a big fan of using no lighting at all. I also mostly shoot in Frame Mode, unless it is for ENG broadcast. - don
__________________
DONALD BERUBE - noisybrain. Productions, LLC Director Of Photography/ Producer/ Consultant http://noisybrain.com/donbio.html CREATE and NETWORK with http://www.bosfcpug.org and also http://fcpugnetwork.org |
February 20th, 2004, 11:09 AM | #11 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Alfonso
One of the best features of the XL1S system is its modular design and "open architecture" system. Need XLR inputs? Simply add them. Need an LCD display? Just add it. My own XL1 is equipped with XLR inputs and a 5.5" LCD screen, and there's no reason why yours can't be similarly configured. |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|