|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 8th, 2009, 04:09 PM
|
#16 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 213
|
8 Channels
Alister,
Sony has responded, and they will take a look at some Nano files and check for XDCAM HD 422 constraints that may differ. Yes, 8 channels seems to be an issue. Dan and Mike are on this and we all hope to have an answer soon. I will love the day we can drop Nano files from an EX right on to an optical disk. To archive EX to 422 50Mb and have proxies generated will be a huge advance. I just hope the copy times are reasonable for field purposes. |
|
|
|
September 9th, 2009, 11:59 AM
|
#17 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
The transfer speed will depend on the deck that you are using. The PDW-U1 and XDCAM HD422 cameras are single head devices so the write speed is limited to somewhere around 70-80 Mb/s so for 50 Mb/s files it will be around 1.5x to 1.7x real time. If you write to one of the HD1500 decks this has 2 lasers so the read and write speeds are double. I'm not sure that writing to a U1 will ever be considered fast, but it should be very robust and excellent for long term storage.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
