|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 19th, 2011, 08:45 PM
|
#16 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
|
Re: nano
__________________
Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia |
|
|
|
October 20th, 2011, 01:07 AM
|
#17 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 1,774
|
Re: nano
Ian,
The listing that Dan linked to is pretty accurate. I usually don't let the cards fill completely up, not because that would be a problem but because I usually want to start offloading at an opportune time. But, I usually go just a little over 30 minutes on my 64GB cards and they are just about full. -Garrett |
|
|
|
|
October 20th, 2011, 02:21 PM
|
#18 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: York, North Yorkshire, England.
Posts: 472
|
Re: nano
Thanks Dan +Garrett
Garrett is it the better pic you get 220mps or what other reason do you use this high bitrate for
__________________
Ian Thomas. Thomas Video Productions |
|
|
|
|
October 21st, 2011, 01:44 PM
|
#19 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 1,774
|
Re: nano
Ian, it could be psychosomatic but I think there is a quality improvement at 220 over 180. I have no hard testing data to prove it but I suppose a few quick shots of charts would prove it one way or the other.
-Garrett |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
