|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 2nd, 2012, 08:43 AM | #31 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Re: Nanoflash
..and some link, please?
;)
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
August 2nd, 2012, 08:55 AM | #32 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 873
|
Re: Nanoflash
Hi Dan
Quote:
Quote:
The MediaPro.xml file contains the information on all the clips recorded and how they stitch together while the xml files within the CLPR folder contains the relevant information on the clips themselves which also reside there (each in their own subfolder). I'm just wondering if your engineers ever even looked at this as an option? Quote:
I love the Nano - it's great especially with consumer cameras with decent chips but no decent recording option but I still wish it had better workflow options :) It isn't really a problem except when it doesn't work as in my current issue with LongGOP media 100Mbs on Avid breaking the AMA plug. http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/converge...es-errors.html No way around it that I've worked out so far. I tried converting all the mxf clips to mov using Sorenson and that would have worked except it broke timecode. Hope all that clears up a few misconceptions - cheers Dan John |
|||
August 2nd, 2012, 08:56 AM | #33 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
|
Re: Nanoflash
Dear Piotr,
We do not have a link up for this software at this time. I will ask our team to put up a link as soon as practical.
__________________
Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia |
August 2nd, 2012, 08:59 AM | #34 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Augusta Georgia
Posts: 5,421
|
Re: Nanoflash
Dear John,
Thank you for your suggestions. I will discuss this with our engineers.
__________________
Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia |
December 9th, 2012, 12:49 PM | #35 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Drachten, Netherlands
Posts: 179
|
Re: Nanoflash
Quote:
Thanks, Ron |
|
December 9th, 2012, 03:27 PM | #36 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: York, North Yorkshire, England.
Posts: 472
|
Re: Nanoflash
Don't know what you all think but are you getting a funny feeling that alls not well? Dan use to be on here like a flash if someone had a prob or needed support and now hardly comes on here and no news of the upgrades to the nano that were promised!!
Hope Iam wrong because they were a first class company
__________________
Ian Thomas. Thomas Video Productions |
December 12th, 2012, 01:11 PM | #37 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,222
|
Re: Nanoflash
Nanoflash with CF cards was/is great, but it's done. They're probably on to making a new compact 4K recording system with SSDs. If they made some smaller ones for POV cameras for < $1k, I'd be in for a few.
|
December 12th, 2012, 03:19 PM | #38 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Re: Nanoflash
My only gripe was the lack of BPAV file structure, meaning that (at least for Sony Vegas) you have to manually stitch together on your timeline any spanned files.
CD has not (and by now, will not) make a MXF to MXF stitcher and a fix for the illegal black record kill switch on HDMI might never see the light of day. |
December 12th, 2012, 08:14 PM | #39 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,420
|
Re: Nanoflash
Quote:
I am getting the message that many people have moved on, or would like to, or are mad at CD for not supporting/extending/updating the NF, but for me, it is still a pretty good life-extender for my HDV camera, and I look forward to seeing how it works on a Canon C100, too. ***edit*** Never mind. I did finally search on the right terms and found this thread: http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/converge...ions-nano.html , which explains the issues Jack has experienced using the Nanoflash as a screen recorder.
__________________
30 years of pro media production. Vegas user since 1.0. Webcaster since 1997. Freelancer since 2000. College instructor since 2001. Last edited by Seth Bloombaum; December 12th, 2012 at 11:55 PM. |
|
December 13th, 2012, 03:22 AM | #40 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Re: Nanoflash
Some POV cameras also output illegal blacks when the camera is covered. This causes the Nanoflash to completely stop recording.
|
February 13th, 2013, 06:56 PM | #41 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Padua/Venice - Italy
Posts: 131
|
Re: Nanoflash
Quote:
when will that happen?????
__________________
PDW-F800.PXW-X200.Odyssey7Q+.A7S.www.videoshot.it-Videoshot |
|
February 15th, 2013, 02:58 AM | #42 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Southport, United Kingdom
Posts: 723
|
Re: Nanoflash
Just got my regular e-mail from Convergent Design re yet another firmware update for their "Gemini"but not a dicky bird , again, about the "nanoFlash".
Seems us nano owners are now ancient history. Ron |
February 15th, 2013, 10:05 AM | #43 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nashvegas, TN
Posts: 79
|
Re: Nanoflash
You should be a Flash XDR owner!!
|
February 15th, 2013, 12:09 PM | #44 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Re: Nanoflash
Speaking of that, since the XDR has been completely abandoned, how about open sourcing that device's firmware code? an OpenXDR firmware initiative would mean newer bugs would be fixable.
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|