|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 30th, 2008, 01:34 AM | #46 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 197
|
The article states, "Should HD DVD lose the format war, Microsoft will have to start using Blu-ray Disc on the Xbox 360 in order to allow users to play high definition video games." This is plainly incorrect. XBox 360 does not need an HD-DVD or Blu-ray drive to deliver HD gaming.
Furthermore, Microsoft already offers a substantial selection of HD movie & TV content downloads via XBox Live. If anything, this sort of online delivery of HD material may trump both Blu-ray and HD-DVD.
__________________
Bored? Check out my blog (shot with Sony EX1, Panasonic TM700, Nikon D7100, Sony NEX-5N, GoPro2): LongLongHoneymoon.com |
January 30th, 2008, 01:52 AM | #47 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 352
|
Quote:
-A |
|
January 30th, 2008, 01:59 AM | #48 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Quote:
So, three questions: - Why don't electronic downloads/subscriptions/rentals trump DVD sales/Netflix/rentals today? - What is preventing downloads from winning today? - What change on the horizon will alter the balance? (C.S. I don't mean to pick on you. Many people predict that downloads are the future. The questions above are open to anybody. If there is a sea change on the horizon, I'd like to know. I'm open to the notion that things will change...)
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
|
January 30th, 2008, 02:44 AM | #49 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 352
|
Quote:
Video-on-demand has been "the next big thing" for like 15 years now but for one reason or another it has never caught on like the industry thought it would. -A |
|
January 30th, 2008, 08:14 AM | #50 | ||
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 129
|
Reasons
Quote:
1- The infrastructure isn't there. a) Apple, et. al, still are feeling out/experimenting on the formula, etc to make this so. b) the Net infrastructure is not ready for the bandwidth. And it does not help when in the USA, those who are supposed to provide it are lagging compared to other other countries. c) this lag also brings with it higher cost, compared to other countries. 2- Unclear formation of consumer perception or concept of video viewing. Maybe the next generation will have this mind set in the future, but for now, it has not yet gelled for many. Many still psychologically feel that there is still a big difference in having a physical disc to "own" vs to merely stream it. It's like collecting stamps or rocks. Without that disc or media, there is a feeling 3- Lack of infrastructure again. If in time the streaming model should dominate, it won't happen if most homes are automatically wired (or wirelessly "wired") and can steream videos on demand, like opening tap water. If the consumer has to open a PC, log in, etc. This delay of gratification is bad for acceptance in the new "format." 4 - The content providers know how valuable they are. But they are not yet certain or unclear as to this new model. Hence, they would parlay the disc medium first, and see how the other guys are going to sell their contents in their own way. 5. To totally go via the Net for video, would miss out existing revenues. In the 3rd world and in other places, not everybody is wired. Discs will provide that revenue stream for these content providers. Also, it is still cheaper to buy a player and the disc than for an entire country or state to wire their locality with the bandwidth required for streaming video. 6. The standards for streaming is still being contested. It may seem mpeg4 is it, or some other codec is it, but Apple for one would really like the entire world to use their own :-) And how does AVCHD going to play in this whole scheme? Would the other players just roll over and die without a fight? What about MS? .wmv may be weak, but hey, they wouldn't just take this without a say. Would it be possible to have a file format that can be compressed in higher bandwidth be streamable and can be smaller when sent to the web? And how will this be resolved? Same answer as the previous. When the stake holders can address the points I have raised that's how its going to be played out. Quote:
Or the can co-exist. There is still a sociological/psychological reason for people to be able to touch or "own" something they can see and touch physically. Discs do that. Or then maybe, even discs will be passe and are unwittingly a transition medium themselves. If the price of SSDs or CFs go down drastically, these SD/CFs are better mediums. They are small, can be made faster in time, can be scaled in storage size without having buy a new drive to read the new higher capacity discs. No alignment or calibration problems, easier to archive, etc. etc. |
||
January 31st, 2008, 05:56 AM | #51 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 72
|
Mel,
Thank you very much for such an intelligent and articulate explanation as to why dowloading/streaming is a looooong way from being a practical alternative to physical discs. People just have no concept of how much bandwidth is necessary to download a two-hour movie in 1080p with TrueHD/DTS-HD MA/uncompressed 5.1 PCM audio. If we all started trying to do that at once, the Internet would come to a screeching halt! The current infrastructure simply couldn't handle it and the major telecoms are upgrading their equipment and cabling at a painful snail's pace. And I'm only referring to the U.S., much less the rest of the world! Aloha |
January 31st, 2008, 12:28 PM | #52 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
HD DVD player sales up again. From IMDb.com:
"HD DVD Sales Rebound Apparently reassured by statements from Universal and Paramount/DreamWorks that they have no plans to follow the lead of Warner Bros. in abandoning Toshiba's HD DVD high-definition video system, sales of HD DVD players rebounded during the week ended Jan. 19. As reported by the Video Business website, HD DVD players accounted for 33 percent of all high-definition units sold during the week, up from just 7 percent a week earlier. However, the same week saw price cuts of $100-$200 dollars for the HD DVD players, which may have contributed to the rise in sales. Nevertheless, tech research firm Gartner predicted that Toshiba's price cutting "may prolong HD DVD's life a little, but the limited line-up of film titles will inflict fatal damage on the format." Paramount and Universal account for only 30 percent of all HD movies sold." heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
January 31st, 2008, 12:45 PM | #53 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 197
|
I agree that consumers like owning tangible objects, and discs fit the bill. And that there are bandwidth challenges ahead.
That said, consumers have embraced rent-by-mail services like Netflix in which there is no tangible ownership of any disc. It’s not hard to envision a movie download service whereby consumers pay a flat fee ($19.95 or whatever) in exchange for HD movie downloads. There would be usage restrictions (ie. maybe a cap on the number of new releases per month, movies expire 48 hours after download, etc.), but it would essentially provide all the benefits of Netflix without the snailmail. Microsoft already has a foundation in place with Xbox Live, which has over 10 million paying members (by comparison, Netflix has 7.5 million members). XBox Live now offers HD (720p) TV & movie downloads, but they are charging on an ala carte basis. IMHO they (along with Apple / iTunes) need to tweak the business model to improve the value proposition for consumers. I think a flat monthly fee would be more attractive. Note that Netflix is now developing its own set-top box with LG. This will compete with AppleTV, Xbox 360, and Vudu. It’s said that Netflix subscribers will pay nothing extra for this service (other than the cost of the hardware). So if you are a Netflix subscriber, you will be able to simply download movies straight to your TV. http://blog.wired.com/business/2008/...x-partner.html The revolution won't happen overnight, but in the States it may not be so far away. This is something that will play out over the next several years. If and when download services offer better value than discs, consumers will likely follow.
__________________
Bored? Check out my blog (shot with Sony EX1, Panasonic TM700, Nikon D7100, Sony NEX-5N, GoPro2): LongLongHoneymoon.com |
January 31st, 2008, 12:53 PM | #54 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
The Vudu device (www.vudu.com) is one of the coolest gadgets I've used in a while. I really enjoy downloading movies and watching them. A lot of the popular films have a couple of minutes cached in the 250 GB drive, so when I purchase or rent one, it usually can be viewed at once.
My Internet connection is DSL at 6 mbps, but I average around 4. It's perfect. The Bourne trilogy in HD looks fantastic. I still love DVDs, but when studios start to release movies with special features for Vudu, Apple TV, etc., I'll probably drop DVD purchases like I dropped CD buys. heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
January 31st, 2008, 01:03 PM | #55 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 352
|
Quote:
I don't think physical media will disappear for a long, long time, but it's market share will drop significantly as it co-exists w/downloadable content. -A |
|
January 31st, 2008, 02:11 PM | #56 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Quote:
Wal-Mart sells a few discs. :) They started a download service a year ago with HP doing the back end. HP backed out of the deal, forcing Wal-Mart to make a do-over. Clearly, it's not much of a business today. And I don't think Wal-Mart believes it to be huge in the near term. My guess is that they're just hedging their bets. They have enough clout with the studios, and the development/operational costs are so small for them that it's cheap insurance.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
|
January 31st, 2008, 03:43 PM | #57 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 195
|
I think this war will be moot once flash memory becomes even more affordable. I don't think it's too far off, you will be able to own a small(think Ipod) device or 2 with a mini HDMI-type port that you can just take down to Walmart(or online store) and upload movies to for 10 or 20 bucks each. All the copy protection would be on the device in the form of encryption, I mean how far off are 100+ gig flash devices and once they are available on the cheap it will eliminate the player entirely. It will do to the DVD market what the Ipod has done to the CD. Sure the device may cost more than the CD, but since it's replacing the player as well it won't matter. If the storage was in the terabyte range then a whole library of movies could be stored on it.
This will be a good thing, imagine how many miles high all the CD/DVD's ever produced would stack up(probably reach the moon). Might see it in 5 years maybe, give or take, the only thing that could hold it back is a stubborn industry unwilling to give up discs and the infrastructure they created to support them. |
January 31st, 2008, 03:57 PM | #58 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
The Vudu has an HDMI port, which is great. But until the studios allow special features with downloadable movies, I think downloadable rentals are going to be king for a while. It's nice not to have to go to the video store or wait for Netflix to show up.
But I'll say it again, watching the Bourne trilogy in HD on the Vudu is very similar to watching the HD DVD. I am impressed! heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
February 1st, 2008, 02:43 AM | #59 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 72
|
Quote:
I do understand the concept of "good enough" though, when dealing with the masses. I'm a network consultant specializing in Microsoft solutions. I readily admit that Microsoft didn't get to where they are by being the best. They beat their competitors by being just "good enough" at a competitive price point, with a pretty talented marketing division. But that's a whole other discussion. |
|
February 1st, 2008, 12:25 PM | #60 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 334
|
Personally, I like being able to take my disc to a friend's house for biweekly movie nights. Or to take a disc to my parents' or in-laws' house. Or anywhere else. Until something portable comes along that's universal (e.g. DVDs) and easy to transport (e.g., DVDs), and is durable/permanent (e.g., DVDs) then the disc is not gonna go away. We use Netflix for the "we'll see that on DVD" movies, and we buy the DVDs for movies we really like and for other stuff that doesn't come out in the theatre.
Relate this to eBooks & the paperless office, with respect to what consumers want. People like to be able to hold things, see them, feel them. The paperless office has generated more paper than the non-paperless office used to. When I get an eBook, I print it out. Can't really take my computer to the...umm, well, you get the idea. Driving down the road, I (or my wife) can watch a movie (portable DVD player) or read a book (on paper). Or listen to one of 10,000 MP3s (iPod). I see tons of cars everyday with the DVD players making the kids happy (I have a fairly long commute). Until whatever technology comes along is as easy to use as a disc and as portable as a disc and as durable as a disc, most people are going to stay with the disc. Personally, I hate watching movies on my computer. My couch is SOOOO much more comfortable, and my TV quite a bit bigger than my computer monitors.... Just my $.02. I like discs... Matt |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|