|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 16th, 2009, 08:54 PM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,414
|
AX3 system
that is really cool!
landing_page_Kara_3G_cropped_ir v3 v3 Tea Party Example | v3 Depth Enhanced HD Video | Vision III
__________________
I love this place! |
April 17th, 2009, 10:13 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 566
|
Wow, nice system! But the price ain't for the faint of heart :)
__________________
--JA |
April 17th, 2009, 12:01 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
I don't get it... what exactly does this do? I don't see anything particularly out of the ordinary about the sample videos. They certainly don't look more '3D'.
__________________
My latest short documentary: "Four Pauls: Bring the Hat Back!" |
April 17th, 2009, 12:09 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 613
|
I remember this from researching 35mm adapter tech from 2004. I wasn't impressed then, and not impressed now. They should do some before and after shots to attempt to showcase what this is all about. To me it just looks like nicely shot 1/3-2/3 chip HD footage. I'd say you get more essence of 3D from the gimbal stabilizer work seen on their examples.
__________________
www.holyzoo.com |
April 17th, 2009, 01:06 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
I recently attended a talk by V3. Years ago they found that you get a 3D effect by taking two photos side by side (like stereo), then switching between them. They found a 4.3 Hz rate to be optimal. You can take your own photos, put them on a timeline, line up the subject of interest, loop and test.
This basic approach is harsh. Rather than switching, if you can wobble the camera position in a sine-wave motion, it's more acceptable. One problem is that much of the time, the camera position is in the middle. The next evolution was a circular motion. That gives both vertical and horizontal perspectives. Their first prototypes moved the whole camera/lens. The latest version moves just the aperture. I'd be curious to see this combined with stereo 3D. In the real world, we get 3D cues from stereo as well as the movement of our head/body. For instance, when we walk, we bob up and down. Motion persistence and 3D are real. Birds with eyes on the sides of their heads lack foveal stereo vision, yet they can land on tree branches and telephone wires.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|