|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 1st, 2011, 04:54 PM | #76 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sitka Alaska
Posts: 470
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
Looks like a 64 hundred dollar question to me. Yikes.....
|
September 1st, 2011, 08:31 PM | #77 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
Don't know if it's just you, but it looks okay from here. Anybody else have issues with this PDF?
|
September 1st, 2011, 11:49 PM | #78 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Posts: 410
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
No problems with downloading and printing the PDF.
|
September 2nd, 2011, 02:25 AM | #79 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cornsay Durham UK
Posts: 1,992
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
PDF OK for me too.
__________________
Over 15 minutes in Broadcast Film and TV production: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1044352/ |
September 2nd, 2011, 03:02 AM | #80 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 356
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
|
September 2nd, 2011, 04:14 AM | #81 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
Yes, the same batt. as the AG-HPX170/171, which is the CGA-D54.
|
September 2nd, 2011, 04:39 AM | #82 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 356
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
Great! Thanks for the info Chris!
|
September 19th, 2011, 10:22 AM | #83 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 81
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
New HPX-250 footage on Youtube: AG-HPX250 Sample Footage *warning* some numb-nuts shot the footage interlaced.
|
September 19th, 2011, 10:41 AM | #84 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cornsay Durham UK
Posts: 1,992
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
Looks pretty much like what I would expect from my 301 and 371.
__________________
Over 15 minutes in Broadcast Film and TV production: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1044352/ |
September 19th, 2011, 06:38 PM | #85 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 552
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
Quote:
Just watched the footage, is it me or the most boring thing ever...... |
|
September 19th, 2011, 07:59 PM | #86 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Potomac Falls, VA
Posts: 215
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
Here is a real project with the 250:
|
September 20th, 2011, 02:15 AM | #87 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 81
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
Quote:
Apparently someone wrote that if you watch in 720p there are no scanlines, though I'm pretty sure i saw them at all resolutions... but yeah, boring. Now the challenge video is more of what I like to see. |
|
September 20th, 2011, 03:56 PM | #88 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 406
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
No 1080P 60P? Was hoping since this feature is in Panny's high to mid level consumer cams (TM900, SD90) that this would be creep into the prosumer end.
__________________
GH4 + Voigtlander 25mm, Panasonic TM900, Vegas Pro 16, Adobe CC |
September 24th, 2011, 03:24 AM | #89 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 356
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
Somebody explain: how can the XF305 compete with this camera? It can't possibly be worth 2.5k more... Can it? I think Canon should readjust their price...
|
September 24th, 2011, 12:17 PM | #90 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 2,231
|
Re: new camera: Panasonic AG-HPX250
You have a good point. The XF300 is only a little more but the SDI ports are the difference. Both have strong codecs with the Panasonic costing more to operate. 1 hour of P2 is about $650 I hour of mpeg-2 50mbps is less than half the price. The Panny will be better in sensitivity (especially in 1080p).
The HPX-250 should be quite a camera. The 160 looks to be a good value as well. I am surprised I have not seen a review yet since these cameras are so close to being on the shelf. |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|