|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 22nd, 2005, 03:29 PM | #16 |
Wrangler
|
I don't have the complete low down, but from what I've seen, they may be able to replace even the CRT broadcast monitors. Could be wrong though. Nonetheless, SEDs are perfect to replace any consumer display device.
The new SED displays are a hybrid CRT-LED technology. My understanding is that each liquid crystal acts as a CRT with a phosphorescent coating. The response time and luminescence is similar to a CRT. The prototypes at the Canon Expo were stunning, supported HD, and didn't exhibit any ghosting, or problems with viewing angles.
__________________
"Ultimately, the most extraordinary thing, in a frame, is a human being." - Martin Scorsese |
October 8th, 2005, 10:17 PM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 218
|
Quote:
Sony has had a habit of pushing oddball "standards" while ignoring market realities. Also, a few years ago when my 1989-90 era XBR Trinitron suffered an apparent horizontal drive failure, I decided to see what was available to replace it. Sony still had XBRs, and they looked great, but they also had compromised and introduced a loss-leader Trinitron series. They had silvery screens, poor contrast and picture quality. I bought a Panasonic 32" set and never regretted it.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
|
October 9th, 2005, 02:16 PM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 427
|
Quote:
Problem for Sony. Good for us. |
|
October 15th, 2005, 08:30 AM | #19 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,798
|
More bad news for Sony
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/051015/japan...rade.html?.v=1
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|