DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Digital Video Industry News (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/digital-video-industry-news/)
-   -   Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/digital-video-industry-news/524952-samsung-nx1-h-265-4k.html)

Mark Rosenzweig May 13th, 2015 08:56 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 


Michael Kraus May 13th, 2015 12:40 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
1 Attachment(s)
Has anyone shot much in 1080p? I noticing some gnarly issues in high-detail areas. The 1080p is already about as soft as the 6D but then there are these crazy artifacts. Perhaps some sort of noise reduction? There are "smudges" all over the image at times. It particularly is evident around hair and skin-tones.

Ken Ross May 13th, 2015 02:10 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
I'd much rather shoot in 4K and down-rez to HD. Much better results.

Michael Kraus May 13th, 2015 03:00 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Yeah the 4K looks great. I need me my 60p though.

Ken Ross May 13th, 2015 06:00 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
If your TV has a frame doubler (most TVs of recent vintage do), engaging it can make 30p look very similar to 60p.

I do just that with my 1080p plasma and my down-rez'd 4K>HD looks very smooth.

I just got back from BB where they had just mounted the new 65" UHD OLED TV. I brought a couple of 4K projects from the NX1 and it looked superb...including the motion.

Yes, you have to shoot with an awareness of 30p. But done correctly, you should not have any significant issues.

Tim Polster May 14th, 2015 06:48 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
What if your client does not have the special TV needed for the footage to look proper?

4k is still too much for a lot of post production workflows, especially in H.265 which needs to be transcoded for most NLE's. I think it is important for all manufacturers and software makers to not "drink the Kool-Aid" on 4k. We still need 1080p and 720p way more and often use DVD for delivery as well.

The in-camera downsampling should be as good as your NLE these days if done correctly. No excuse for a 4k camera to not produce stellar 1080p. But you can not lose sight of the fact that this is a still camera.

Ken Ross May 14th, 2015 09:05 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Tim, it seems to me that no prosumer 4K camera offers HD shooting that's as good as an HD transcoded copy from 4K. I don't think it's quite as easy to do as you might think.

Either way, it doesn't seem a big deal to me. When I edit, I edit in 4K and then either make a 4K or HD render. Sometimes I'll do both. It doesn't require any additional editing to make an HD copy of a 4K project.

As far as stills go, I find it exceedingly easy to grab an almost infinite number of 8meg frame grabs from a 4K timeline. Very nice & a multitude of possibilities.

Mark Rosenzweig May 14th, 2015 11:01 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Polster (Post 1886602)
What if your client does not have the special TV needed for the footage to look proper?

4k is still too much for a lot of post production workflows, especially in H.265 which needs to be transcoded for most NLE's. I think it is important for all manufacturers and software makers to not "drink the Kool-Aid" on 4k. We still need 1080p and 720p way more and often use DVD for delivery as well.

The in-camera downsampling should be as good as your NLE these days if done correctly. No excuse for a 4k camera to not produce stellar 1080p. But you can not lose sight of the fact that this is a still camera.

While I agree with a lot of what you are saying, I think calling 4K "Kool-Aid" is over the top and calling on manufacturers and software producers to ignore it is uncalled for. You can go on shooting 720p no matter what innovations there are. More substantively, even if you always deliver at less than 4K, 4K not only gives you higher-quality, lower-resolution videos but gives you more creative possibilities - for example, you can zoom in post, reframe in post and not lose any resolution for the delivery of Full HD. This is not Kool-Aid, this is a real aid to higher quality video.

And as for excuses, what excuses does Canon have for delivering soft and artifact-ridden HD? Being a stills camera is irrelevant (whatever that means). Apparently, as Ken says, it must be harder to downsample in the camera than you think.

Tim Polster May 14th, 2015 11:29 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Everybody calm down. I am not speaking ill of 4k. What I am calling Kool-Aid is the idea that all of the sudden 4k will be the center of production and 'who needs those other formats'... 4k is a tool, but is way too early to be the main or only format of quality on a camera imho.

Having a camera that shoots great 4k and sub par 1080p is what I am referring to. This was the case when the HD era arrived and cameras started coming out without an SD mode. Well, the next round of cameras had the SD modes put back in. The makers can't dictate how we need the use the cameras to make money.

btw, being a stills camera means it probably does not have the processing power for video as a dedicated video camera. The mid level 4k video cameras have excellent 1080p as they utilize quality downsampling from the 4k imager.

Mark Rosenzweig May 14th, 2015 07:51 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Back to a video (4K, sorry):


Tim Polster May 15th, 2015 09:08 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Yes, amazing level of detail.

Mark Rosenzweig May 19th, 2015 08:56 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 

<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/128207731" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>

Kris Kohuth May 19th, 2015 11:07 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
1 Attachment(s)
Hi, Mark.

I'm seeing an occasional vertical smearing at the bottom edge of the frame, usually during a tilt-up from areas of high-density detail, like the grass at 24:09 (see the thumbnail).

I thought it might be my non-4K system choking, but when I downloaded the full-res file from Vimeo, the weirdness shows up when advanced frame-by-frame, in both Edius and Premiere. Any ideas?

.

Mark Rosenzweig May 19th, 2015 05:44 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kris Kohuth (Post 1887032)
Hi, Mark.

I'm seeing an occasional vertical smearing at the bottom edge of the frame, usually during a tilt-up from areas of high-density detail, like the grass at 24:09 (see the thumbnail).

I thought it might be my non-4K system choking, but when I downloaded the full-res file from Vimeo, the weirdness shows up when advanced frame-by-frame, in both Edius and Premiere. Any ideas?

.

Thanks for looking. It appears this artifact is the result of PowerDirector 13, which I have used to edit the clips.

Here is the link to the original clip that has the artifact in the full PD 13-rendered video, converted using the Samsung Movie converter.

https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resi...nt=video%2cmp4

You will see that this artifact is not in the original clip.

The clips for the Vimeo video were rendered in PD13 using XAVC S, at 100 Mbps.

Mark Rosenzweig May 20th, 2015 05:23 PM

Post 1.3 firmware update slo-mo test from 1080 120p
 

Kris Kohuth May 22nd, 2015 11:15 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Rosenzweig (Post 1887056)
Thanks for looking. It appears this artifact is the result of PowerDirector 13, which I have used to edit the clips.

Here is the link to the original clip that has the artifact in the full PD 13-rendered video, converted using the Samsung Movie converter.

https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resi...nt=video%2cmp4

You will see that this artifact is not in the original clip.

The clips for the Vimeo video were rendered in PD13 using XAVC S, at 100 Mbps.

Thanks for isolating the issue. (And the 1080p 120 is impressive.)

Larry Secrest May 27th, 2015 04:26 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
I'm curious about this cam and I found this footage, and I must say the NX1 is sharper, but as far as color, at least on my screen, it's a match.

Tim Polster May 27th, 2015 09:07 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Quick question:

Does the 120fps recording mode have the ability to record audio? Or is it an overcrank mode without audio.

Thanks.

Ken Ross May 27th, 2015 08:59 PM

NX1 4K video of the 2015 Bethpage Airshow
 
How effective is the AF with the new firmware? Although my intent was not to 'test' it at an event like this, but rather capture some interesting footage, it nonetheless does show how well Samsung improved the AF.

All shots are straight from the camera, edited in PD13 and shot with the 18-200mm lens.

Select 4K if you have the ability to view on a 4K or UHD monitor.


Dave Blackhurst May 28th, 2015 03:08 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Looks very nice on a 4K monitor! Samsung seems to have done a pretty good job at producing good sharp 4K images, anyone try their NX500 (the baby bro to the NX1)? Been contemplating that one as a "pocket" camera, seeing as Samsung seems to be at least as much on top of 4K, if not more than the "big boys".

I'm happy with the Sony AX100, but getting a tad tired of waiting for a 4K update to the RX10 or any of their other still (Alpha) cams for that matter

Ken Ross May 28th, 2015 09:02 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Thanks Dave. Things improved quite a bit subsequent to the last firmware update.

The AF performance was significantly improved.

Mark Rosenzweig May 28th, 2015 10:02 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Blackhurst (Post 1887765)
Looks very nice on a 4K monitor! Samsung seems to have done a pretty good job at producing good sharp 4K images, anyone try their NX500 (the baby bro to the NX1)? Been contemplating that one as a "pocket" camera, seeing as Samsung seems to be at least as much on top of 4K, if not more than the "big boys".

I'm happy with the Sony AX100, but getting a tad tired of waiting for a 4K update to the RX10 or any of their other still (Alpha) cams for that matter

The NX500 does fine in 4K UHD, and the crop actually is useful:



Larry Secrest May 29th, 2015 12:17 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
All the footage I've seen from the last couple videos posted on this thread are incredibly sharp and crisp and detailed. Amazing resolution,but the overall feeling is so video and digital.
Can anybody who has posted some of the footage try to pretend they're filming a 30" narrative and try to be as cinematic as they can? It's just that for me, and I'm mainly interested in shorts, this cam seems so harsh and blunt.

Ken Ross May 29th, 2015 02:33 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Thanks Larry...I think. :)

Mark and I have very similar styles of shooting and, speaking for myself (and I think for Mark), it's that 'you are there' look that we so love.

I always try to replicate the look & feel of what I'm shooting and for me that pushes me toward the look that you probably don't like, video.

Larry Secrest May 30th, 2015 04:32 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Fair enough. I'd say, hooked to a light gimbal stabilizer this is the cam for a doc, no doubt.

Mark Rosenzweig May 30th, 2015 06:50 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Larry Secrest (Post 1887871)
Fair enough. I'd say, hooked to a light gimbal stabilizer this is the cam for a doc, no doubt.


Enrique Orozco Robles May 30th, 2015 12:41 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
...what about the steadicam solo with the NX1 ?? ... any toughts ??

Galen Rath May 31st, 2015 12:24 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Mark, the videos using the NX500 are really nice. What is in your lens collection for this camera?

Mark Rosenzweig May 31st, 2015 04:38 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Galen Rath (Post 1887976)
Mark, the videos using the NX500 are really nice. What is in your lens collection for this camera?

Thanks. The 16-50mm PZ, the 60mm Macro, the 50-200mm zoom, and the 16-50mm S (for low light).

Mark Rosenzweig June 29th, 2015 07:55 AM

And now the Samsung NX500 is almost a Pocketable NX1
 
With the recent firmware update, so that 4K has 70 Mbps H265 bitrates and there is improved AF in video mode, the NX500 is more like a little NX1:


I had no trouble seeing the lcd image on this bright beach.


I took advantage of crop mode.

Larry Secrest June 29th, 2015 03:32 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Very nice, thank for posting this.
What lenses are you using?

Mark Rosenzweig June 29th, 2015 06:27 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Larry Secrest (Post 1891053)
Very nice, thank for posting this.
What lenses are you using?

You are welcome. One lens (I have to travel light): the 16-50mm PZ.

Mark Rosenzweig June 29th, 2015 06:29 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 

Steven Ansell June 30th, 2015 01:52 AM

Re: And now the Samsung NX500 is almost a Pocketable NX1
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Rosenzweig (Post 1890999)

That is Strelitzia reginae, also known as the bird of paradise flower. It comes from South Africa.

Larry Secrest July 1st, 2015 07:38 PM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
Another nice footage. Thanks for the lens.
One day, when and if you have time, I'd like to see how cinematic the NX1 could be. Do you have CineConvert by any chance? Have you tried to play with the footage in post to make it more film like?

Aaron Jones Sr. October 2nd, 2017 09:09 AM

Re: Samsung NX1: H.265 and 4k
 
3 Attachment(s)
I'm truly impressed with the Samsung NX1. Although now it is 2017 and the same limitations that existed a couple years ago no longer exist. Like codec issues with the H.265. Now today it is very easy to edit and grade the footage. Here is a little quick video I did to give some idea of how easy the footage is to customize to your liking. I have also included a free lut and the link is also in the YouTube Video description.

Free Samsung LUT: Samsung Basic Lut - Lifted Blacks

I have also been able to use with the Zhiyun Crane with no problems. I use the Samsung 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 lens because of the light weight and the autofocus works awesome.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:16 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network