I'm going to finally burn one and try it out on my friend's PS3, for the heck of it, and find an HD DVD player and do the same thing. Someone once mentioned to make it withOUT a menu.
Customflix offers Blu-Ray (720p, natch) DVDs (WMV HD now, too, HD DVD coming soon): http://www.customflix.com/Products/HighDefinition.jsp heath |
Quote:
Samsung ships HD DVD enabled laptops and will come out with the BDP-UP5000 dual format player this year so they certainly aren't exclusive. http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/12/s...player-on-the/ Dell is the only exclusive PC manufactuer that I know and they're fading fast. HP sells both platforms. You can buy Media Centre PC with HD DVD drives or their HD100 USB HD DVD player http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product...lang=en-US&s=1 Apple will be adding Blu-ray authoring in the future is my guess but to date they are only supporting HD DVD in DVD Studio Pro 4 The war is not winnable by either company. Blu-ray has required a cartel like hold on studios to survive. HD DVD has required charing less than competition in price to survive. If anyone see an "awesome" movie on Blu-ray you can rest assured that the same movie would look "awesome" on HD DVD. In fact many dual format owners claim that their HD DVD discs still look superior overall. Quote:
Both formats are limited by a maximum of 1080p resolution so regardless of filesize you'll never go above 1080p with the current specification. Here's an interesting post that was closed down on AVS regarding a simultaneous release of Flags of our Fathers on Blu-ray and HD DVD. That Blu-ray disc was encoded at a higher rate in AVC which meant it was 13GB larger in size over the VC-1 HD DVD version http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=855599 As you can see the extra space is superfluous. The picture may even be softer than the VC1 version which sames 13GB. Those who use Cineform and Red codec and now Apple's ProRes 422 should know that size doesn't equate to a better picture. It's about what you do with the encoding that makes or breaks the picture. |
Can anyone confirm that all Blu-Ray players (not just the PS3) will play M2t burned tot a DVD-R/+R disk?
|
to answer to the question :Can we safely say the HD war is a draw ?
we can say yes, there is no war and no winner. The industry has proven that nobody needs HD, at least not in the proposed conditions. DVD is still there and rock solid. If you really need HD, there are solutions (mainly related to computer equipment) that perfectly fit the HD editing workflow. |
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
FWIW, I almost pulled the trigger on the Toshiba unit at Sams Club for $243 last weekend, but the lack of software and the chance of ending up with a dead end format put me off. When I was a kid, I asked for an Intellivision instead of an Atari, and ended up with a technically superior machine that had little industry support. Never again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"If that's all you have going for you, cheaper might win you a battle or two, but without more studio and industry support, it's never going to win you the war." |
Quote:
Yes you get a whole lot more free movies if you buy an HD DVD player but realistically the prices are about the same. -EDIT- I didn’t see Kevin Shaw’s post when I wrote this |
One thing I forgot to mention, Panasonic's own second generation player, the DMP BD10A will come with 5 free movies and the unit is priced at around 600 dollars. I’m hoping Sony does that to their BDP-S300. If they do Panasonic will have to lower their player’s price by 100 dollars as well.
http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/12/h...r-hd-dvd-read/ http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/...-Targets.xhtml http://news.digitaltrends.com/news/s..._as_sales_jump http://www.smarthouse.com.au/Home_Cinema/DVD/H7L2L2R8 http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/06/12...th-600gb-disk/ Can we have a section just for High Definition Formats? |
Quote:
I think having that lower-cost option will help to sway more people over instead of bludgeoning people with one high-priced option, telling them its such better quality. While most everyone on this board knows, and can probably see that 1080p is the best option available- not everyone out there in the general public is entirely convinced. Heck, I know people that think VHS is the greatest thing since sliced bread, and can't understand what all the fuss about this "High Definition" is all about... Just my two cents... |
In the end it's all speculation anyway. Both are here at the moment and likely stay for a while.
I'm hoping that by the end of the year it will be clear where this is going.... |
Quote:
To put it another way, the industry and studio support that blu-ray currently enjoys may evaporate if they don't start pricing their players as cheaply as HD DVD players. |
1080p outputs aren't necessary. The movie is stored as 1080p24 on disc. Thus when the movie is output on a 249.99 HD-D2 (Costco, Sams Club) it's output at 1080i60. Thus it contains the full progressive picture that is delivered after your HDTV de-interlaces the signal properly. Assuming that your TV doesn't blow the de-interlacing the picture quality will be no different regardless of if you player outputs 1080i or 1080p.
HDMI 1.3 is another relatively worthless feature. So it transfers native bit-stream TrueHD or DTS HD. That's great but none of your titles are sending native THD or DTSHD out of the player. They both employ internal mixers so that you can modify the various audio streams. Then the player outputs this mix as PCM to your receiver. So ....you guessed it. You spend a bunch of money for a HDMI 1.3 player and AVR only to have that player working with PCM audio which could have been easily accomplished with a HDMI 1.2 player which is much cheaper. I just mated my HD DVD player with a Sharp Aquos 32" and damn it looks good. My suggestion is to forget the format war and get what makes the most sense for you. Neither format will be obsolete...especially to those on this board...it's not like you all don't have video cameras ;} |
If you can’t see a difference between 1080i and 1080p than why did Toshiba put 1080p in all of the higher priced players? Having a player that can output 24p will give you a better picture no matter how good your TV is and if you’re TV has 120hz and 24p input, the picture will look incredible. Same with HDMI 1.3, why does Toshiba have it in the HD-XA2? Besides the sound options, it does give you 1.8 times the colors if you have a compatible TV and some of them are already out.
Players such as the Toshiba HD-XA2 and the Samsung BD-1200 are fully worth it for the features they include and people should not feel cheated. |
Higher numbers and more specs always impress people.
|
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...kbuster18.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6762621.stm Retailers in Australia did the exact same thing when they said its best to carry just Blu-Ray products. The impact of this announcement might be big but if Amazon does that, well…. |
HD DVD players apparently selling like hotcakes
|
Quote:
The key is Wal-Mart whether you shop there are not Wal-Mart are the walls of Jericho that must come down. I'm looking forward to CEDIA and the Holiday rush. It'll seperate the contenders from the pretenders. |
You sort of misunderstood what I was trying to say meaning BlockBuster taking sides isn’t as big as it sounds and it would only mean anything if Amazon does that.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:59 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network