To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors - Page 2 at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Apple / Mac Post Production Solutions > Final Cut Pro X

Final Cut Pro X
The latest version of FCP from Apple.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 28th, 2011, 10:04 AM   #16
Obstreperous Rex
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 27,368
Images: 513
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Rosales View Post
Apple doesn't care about its customers...unless they're the iphone, ipad or ipod customers.
In other words, they do care about their customers.

Apple is a ship that is changing the direction of its course, and the consumer markets that it is heading into are some lucrative seas indeed.

Their next step: Apple to start making TVs, report says.
__________________
CH

Search DV Info Net | 20 years of DVi | ...Tuesday is Soylent Green Day!
Chris Hurd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 10:26 AM   #17
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Salida, Colorado
Posts: 561
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

Soylent Green is people! For God's sake, it's people!
Charles Newcomb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 10:32 AM   #18
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 351
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

I am fairly familiar with Windows 7. The one thing I will say about OS X is the merciful absence of viruses and other malicious maladies. I have had way more "fun" with such problems on Windows than a person should be allowed to have, and I have used many flavors of anti-virus software, which I updated constantly.

I now have Windows 7 running in VM Fusion on three different Macs, but the use of the internet is solely restricted to required software updates, and I run Norton. The new, free product for internet security from Microsoft failed for a friend of mine.

Also, the constant updates for Windows 7 never seems to stop, and I have to go through the process over and over again, back-to-back, before it all "sticks"

Other's mileage may vary.
Richard D. George is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 10:42 AM   #19
Obstreperous Rex
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 27,368
Images: 513
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoffrey Cox View Post
Is it possible to still upgrade from FCS2 to 3 or FCP6 to 7?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathieu Ghekiere View Post
If you can still find a dealer that sells it, just act quickly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Pryor View Post
I read that they've pulled all existing copies of FCP7 from their shelves. Is this true?
B&H shows the full and upgrade versions of FCS3 as discontinued. The VideoGuys site says "With the release of the FCPX app, inventory of FCS3 has been very tight. We are now taking orders and hope to have more inventory in 1-2 weeks," and that's for the full version only.
__________________
CH

Search DV Info Net | 20 years of DVi | ...Tuesday is Soylent Green Day!
Chris Hurd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 12:51 PM   #20
Major Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warsaw/Poland
Posts: 716
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard D. George View Post
If anyone else is considering switching to Premiere Pro CD 5.5, don't upgrade Mac OS to 10.6.8! It conflicts with the Mercury Playback engine! I was fortunate to see the warnings on the Adobe forum section here at DV Info.
This has already been fixed, you only need new nVidia drivers.
__________________
Creative Impatience - The Solace of Simple Solutions. A few useful plugins for Adobe users, and my remarks on the tools and the craft in general.
Bart Walczak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 03:11 PM   #21
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 39
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

i've had windows 7, WITHOUT and antivirus, and i've never gotten as much as a facebook hack done, EVER.

you need to know what to open, i know this, because my last windows 7 install was 8 months ago, use it daily on the internet forums/facebook/youtube/vimeo and editing video!, latest updates (it updates automatically) and my wife, has had the her computer formatted 5 times in the same period! and she has antivirus!, so it all comes down to HOW you use the computer.

people don't write viruses for MAC because
1. macs are cute
2. everyone hates windows
3. bill gates has more money than steve jobs (ok, i kid i kid)

but seriously, pick up better internet habbits and you'll see how good it is...


and...question...why would you want a VM with windows 7 to not be online?
what can u possibly use it for? wordprocessing?
Alejandro Vargas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 03:44 PM   #22
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 254
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

Yep- internet use is key. I don't run any anti-virus and i'm in the same boat as Alejandro. No problems on that end. Windows 7 does constantly have updates though and that does get tedious.

"In other words, they do care about their customers."

Not across the board so it seems.
__________________
-Roger Rosales
www.rogerrosales.com
Roger Rosales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 04:28 PM   #23
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

I run the AVG free edition as my only antivirus on my Windows editing system CPU. After 10 years, very good. Long ago I learned that Nortons and many of the the other heavy Anti Virus programs end up crashing things more than any virus out there. They also use a lot of resources.

I had a FCP user in my office the other day as we rush edited a small film on Vegas Pro 10. I pulled three different file sources (mp4, avi, and .mov), all with different aspect rations, on to a timeline with out any pre processing. Editing in this fashion is normal for me and I was wondering why he was thinking I had to do something different.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos
Chris Barcellos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 05:11 PM   #24
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 254
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

AVG is good. Sony Vegas has been able to mix and match footage for quite some time now without problems.
__________________
-Roger Rosales
www.rogerrosales.com
Roger Rosales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 05:51 PM   #25
Go Go Godzilla
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ USA
Posts: 2,804
Images: 15
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

I'm surprised how much action this thread has started, but I've seen a few points thrown around that need clarifying or reinforcing:

1. Since XP SP2 Windows machines have been every bit as stable as Mac OS X. However they key to keeping things rock-stable is NOT to use your edit system as your general internet browser or game machine. In fact, most serious post houses never connect their edit systems to the 'net at all specifically for that reason.

2. Windows only needs those constant updates for *internet-based* security, not OS stability. If you have a clean install of XP SP2 or above including Win 7 you do not need to ever get updates from Microsoft unless however a compatibility issue with newer hardware comes up.

3. If Sony Vegas had ever been a native Mac OS X application that's what I'd be using; it is a very powerful, fast and stable NLE. It's on par with but not quite as powerful as PP CS5.5.

4. Remember that switching NLE's or worse, switching over to a PC-only platform will COST you money TWICE. First in the expense of purchasing the software/hardware and second, in the time it takes you to get up to speed with the new environment.

DO NOT assume that if you're a master at FCP that you'll breeze through a system migration of any kind; there will always be "gotchas" that will spring up and you need to allocate time to deal with and fix them.

5. Although the future of FCP is now questionable you still have the option of running Boot Camp to get the best of both worlds. So yes, you always pay a premium for purchasing Apple hardware, but you can't run Mac OS X on a dedicated WinTel machine *without* creating a hack-intosh type rig. Definitely not recommended for any user at any cost.

6. If you follow the advice in point #1 you'll NEVER need any antivirus/anti-spyware on your system, thus nothing to slow it down in the background.

I can't stress enough that while FCP X has turned everything sideways for all of us, FCP 7 remains a very compelling reason NOT to spend any new monies on software - not just yet.

For those who are on older FCP versions, "7" is a worthwhile update as it adds compatibility and bug fixes that plagued previous versions.

In the end remember that software/hardware choices are nothing but tools; if you pick the best tool for your type of work then you'll be fine. Making an emotional bond to your tools or becoming blindly brand-loyal is not only counter productive, it's also a great way to toss money out the door.
Robert Lane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 07:26 PM   #26
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Salida, Colorado
Posts: 561
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

You don't have to buy a PC to run Sony Vegas Pro. I've got it on my MacBook Pro, running under BootCamp... the best of both worlds. I've got Vegas on there because I used to do a lot of news, and with Vegas I could cut very fast, then render to an mpeg2 for FTP uploading without having to leave the program. But I don't do news anymore, thank God.

Still playing with FCP X. So far so good. I'm coming around to the new look. The media management is going to tax my old brain for awhile, but I think I can get used to it.

I don't miss FCS 3 (sold mine this week). I was never crazy about it, anyway. But I liked it more than I do Premiere.

If I get into a situation where I need to do some really serious editing and bring other editors into the mix, I can call my son-in-law and use one of his company's Avid suites.
Charles Newcomb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 08:54 PM   #27
Trustee
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,719
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

My boss at work loves Sony Vegas and I have been forcing myself to play around with it under bootcamp. It has a few holes here and there but it is a very solid NLE.

My solution for dealing with viruses with Windows is to do my web surfing on my iPad.

When it comes to Windows it really does come down to three main areas where get viruses.

1. Adult content. Adult sites have a lot of drive by downloads that infect Windows.
2. Illegal software sites. Viruses just waiting to happen.
3. Junk email.

Avoid adult sites, illegal hacked software and take care with email and Windows can be very solid. I refuse to use virus protection because I view it as just as obtrusive as the viruses themselves. Plus I think viruses are a conspiracy and are created just so people will live in fear and waste money on virus protection every year.

Anyway getting back to Vegas. Those of you who work with RED should at least check it out. It supports native R3D files and works very well. At work our main editor uses CS5 to edit our RED footage but the boss loves Vegas and has used it on a few smaller projects. We all protest Vegas so it doesn't get used very much but we are really starting to consider using it more.
Thomas Smet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 09:05 PM   #28
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,650
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

My experience with Windows XP based production switchers and control room transmission equipment is that viruses get in and slowly ruin the system even with no Internet surfing done on the computers. Windows 7, I don't know as many companies still haven't upgraded their control software to it. The kicker is that some popular virus software sometimes treats the control software as viruses! Tricaster switchers have this problem. As Robert says, the best course of action is to isolated the PCs from the internet completely and download updates on another computer if they are really needed.
__________________
William Hohauser - New York City
Producer/Edit/Camera/Animation
William Hohauser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 09:47 PM   #29
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 696
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

If anyone is interested a have an unused copy of FCS 3 upgrade that has never been registered. I tried to sell it on the forum here but no one was interested.

I wonder if anyone wants it now that FCPX is hated by everyone...

I think that I will post it for sale again.... :)

Daniel Weber
Daniel Weber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2011, 11:16 PM   #30
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 399
Re: To Mac or not to Mac: The Future for Mac-based editors

Hey Daniel, I would jack up the price on that FCS3 upgrade and put it on eBay! That thing is going to be like gold at least until the first FCP X update. ;P
Scott Shama is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Apple / Mac Post Production Solutions > Final Cut Pro X

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network