|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 6th, 2006, 12:10 AM | #16 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
Quote:
Anyways, "uncompressed" (rec. 601) and DV (over firewire) are not the same frame size. "Uncompressed" is 720X486. By uncompressed, I am really talking about a specific format. DV (over firewire) is 720X480. The "depressed about uncompressed" article explains this well. The last time I was working with uncompressed I didn't really have to worry about this, because the DV deck I was using was the DSR-1700. It has SDI out, so you can capture miniDV to the rec. 601 / "uncompressed" format. While that's convenient, I'm not so sure it's worth the several grand paying for that kind of deck. So you might want to look at the resizing. |
|
April 6th, 2006, 07:57 AM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 35
|
Sorry, Matthew and Glenn, for getting makijng a mistake with your names... :)
I had no idea that BetaSP and miniDV frame sizes were different. I thought that the sandard NTSC frame size was 720x480. Thanks for making that clear and for the information. Khashyar |
April 7th, 2006, 03:05 AM | #18 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ironton, Ohio
Posts: 34
|
NTSC is such a confusing beast. I will be glad the day it is gone. The bad thing about this industry is there are toooooooo many standards for different formats, regions and so forth. They need one standard.
|
April 7th, 2006, 07:09 AM | #19 | |
RED Problem Solver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,365
|
Quote:
Graeme
__________________
www.nattress.com - filters for FCP |
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|