|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 30th, 2003, 08:34 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 189
|
Title sequence
I want to create a title sequence. The text generator in Final Cut is quite limiting (only one typeface per entry etc).
Is it a bad idea to create typography in something like Illustrator or Photoshop and import it, then use motion effect to make it move? |
January 30th, 2003, 09:11 AM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 94
|
not a bad idea at all. just make sure to check out the tutorial on lafcpug.org about making your photoshop image correctly.
__________________
This is the way the world ends. |
January 30th, 2003, 07:20 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 105
|
Yes, Photoshop titles can work, though excpect a bit of back and forth fixing.
However, whilst you are correct in saying the text generator in Final Cut is quite limiting don't forget it does come with the Boris text generator, which allows far more control. |
January 30th, 2003, 09:51 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 540
|
The Boris Calligraphy generators are great, as mentioned. Boris Grafitti is even better. You should also check out the CHV text generators -- great value. See kenstone.com for a review.
__________________
-- Vic Owen -- |
January 31st, 2003, 04:33 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 189
|
Is it better to use Boris than the other FC text text generator (or another program altogether eg Photoshop)?
|
January 31st, 2003, 08:50 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 105
|
The Boris generators are much better than the FCP ones. Photoshop is overkill for most straight forward titles. PS comes into its own when you're using complex graphic elements, though only static of course. However, you can achieve quite complex titles with graphic elements using FCP itself since you can overlay numerous tracks above one another and blend together, and they can be animated and include video as well. Kind of like a mini After Effects. PS does have the advantage of more control and a faster work flow. It all really depends on what you want, but if what you want can be achieved in FCP then why not use it.
I've a feeling FCP 4 is going to be pretty slick when it comes to titles. Don't forget Apple bought that title app (India Titles?) last year. |
January 31st, 2003, 09:14 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 189
|
Thanks for that - I'll check out old Boris.
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|