FCP5 and Soundtrack Pro Normalize vs Levels in FCP at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Apple / Mac Post Production Solutions > Final Cut Suite
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Final Cut Suite
Discussing the editing of all formats with FCS, FCP, FCE

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 9th, 2006, 12:49 PM   #1
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,995
FCP5 and Soundtrack Pro Normalize vs Levels in FCP

I'm editing a video in FCP5 and the audio levels from the soundboard at dance recital are low and vary in loudness.

I need to normalize each section of the performance individually. So I'm going to use Sountrack Pro but I'm not used to the workflow. When I right click on the audio track and edit thought Soundtrack Pro it imports the entire clip (all 30 minutes of it) then its hard to find the area that the play head was at in FCP. Is there an easier way? I know I can adjust the levels in FCP using the pen tool but it seems like Normalize does a better job. Any help on the matter would be appreciated.
Pete Cofrancesco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2006, 10:34 PM   #2
Go Go Godzilla
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ USA
Posts: 2,788
Images: 15
Audio editors

Pete,

Soundtrack Pro is a multi-tracking editor with MIDI capabiliites. It's not optimized for altering the scope, EQ curve or other acoustic aspects of single pre-recorded tracks.

The "normalize" function simply looks at the selected music and raises the entire track level so that the peaks don't go over the "digital zero" point and become overdriven. It will not raise the low-level information and make it "louder".

What you want is a compellor, which is a compressor/limiter. This takes the entire selection and raises the low volume sections while limiting the highs. In effect it flattens out the difference between the lowest points and the peaks. Radio stations use this for broadcast music so that quiet passages in music are as easily heard as the loud ones. This is the functionality you want.

The best audio editing software for this kind of work is either PEAK or DECK from Bias. Within PEAK is a plug-in called, "squeeze" which is the compellor functionality, but with a lot of control over how it does it's job.
__________________
Robert Lane
Producer/Creator - Bike Pilots TV
Robert Lane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 11th, 2006, 08:48 AM   #3
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DFW area, TX
Posts: 6,117
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Lane
Pete,

Soundtrack Pro is a multi-tracking editor with MIDI capabiliites. It's not optimized for altering the scope, EQ curve or other acoustic aspects of single pre-recorded tracks.
Robert,

I'm sorry but this is not correct. Soundtrack Pro actually has two functions, in that it does do multitrack editing, but also does waveform editing and incorporates many, many audio processing functions. Some of them are taken straight from Logic Pro, Apple's high end audio software.

The old 'Soundtrack' did not have all this functionality and was pretty much what you described. Soundtrack Pro is much more robust than its predecessor and can also make use of any plug-in available in AU format.

This link, http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/soundtrackpro/ will give you a much better idea of the capabilities I am referring to.

regards,

-gb-
Greg Boston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 11th, 2006, 08:52 AM   #4
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DFW area, TX
Posts: 6,117
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Cofran
I'm editing a video in FCP5 and the audio levels from the soundboard at dance recital are low and vary in loudness.

I need to normalize each section of the performance individually. So I'm going to use Sountrack Pro but I'm not used to the workflow. When I right click on the audio track and edit thought Soundtrack Pro it imports the entire clip (all 30 minutes of it) then its hard to find the area that the play head was at in FCP. Is there an easier way? I know I can adjust the levels in FCP using the pen tool but it seems like Normalize does a better job. Any help on the matter would be appreciated.
Create 'scoring markers' in FCP. When you bring the clip into Soundtrack Pro, the markers will be there for you to easily locate the sections you wish to edit.

-gb-
Greg Boston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 11th, 2006, 11:23 PM   #5
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,995
i ended up using the my tried and tru method of alter the levels with the pen tool in FCP.

robert thx you put a name to the thing i want to do. i'll give it a try.

btw, greg is also right soundtrackpro has grown into a more capable editor its not just for mixing multi tracks anymore.

One thing I'd like to add is that I found soundtrack pro buggy and frustrating in how it integrates with FCP. I spent all this time making edits, when I saved it had an error and corrupted the clip, making me have recapture 30 minutes of footage and loose my edits. The second time I tried it the audio was muted in FCP. when i played the clip in the finder it was ok in the FCP browser but not in the timeline. Why not just drag it back into the timeline? Well I had done many edits that would have to be redone. Bottomline I found soundtrack pro good by itself but aweful as an interal audio editor with in FCP.
Pete Cofrancesco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12th, 2006, 06:24 AM   #6
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 56
Is there any reason why you didn't just use the compressor/limiter in Final Cut's Audio effects?
Lorne Mathre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12th, 2006, 08:31 AM   #7
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorne Mathre
Is there any reason why you didn't just use the compressor/limiter in Final Cut's Audio effects?
I looked at the FCP audio filters but couldn't tell by their name what they do because I don't know much about audio besides raising and lowering the levels. thx I'll give that filter a try.
Pete Cofrancesco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12th, 2006, 10:45 AM   #8
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorne Mathre
Is there any reason why you didn't just use the compressor/limiter in Final Cut's Audio effects?
I just tried that filter didn't seem to have a noticeable effect
Pete Cofrancesco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12th, 2006, 03:55 PM   #9
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 180
When I do recitals, I always get the original music played during the performance (usually a CD burned by the choreographer/instructor) and mix it into the audio along with the "house sound" (cheers, applause, etc.) I recorded with a mic. Then I can choose the levels of each during the edit to achieve a "live" sounding mix. I also record from the sound board, but only as a reference track. Like you, I have found that the levels coming from the sound board are not consistent.


Mike.
__________________
VM Productions
Mike Hanlon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12th, 2006, 04:20 PM   #10
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Hanlon
When I do recitals, I always get the original music played during the performance (usually a CD burned by the choreographer/instructor) and mix it into the audio along with the "house sound" (cheers, applause, etc.) I recorded with a mic. Then I can choose the levels of each during the edit to achieve a "live" sounding mix. I also record from the sound board, but only as a reference track. Like you, I have found that the levels coming from the sound board are not consistent.
Mike.
I was doing a 2 camera shoot. one centered at the back for a fixed long shot of the entire stage plugged into the sound board. The second camera half way down off centered for pan/zooms/close ups with audio from the built in mic on the camera. The long shot camera was unmanned the even though i did a sound and light check it ended up dark and the sound was over driven rendering it unsuable for the most part.

Even if i had to do it over again I still liked 2 cameras because i could cover up my mistakes. but i did notice it added a lot of post production work (twice the footage to capture then having to sync them and pick which camera to show. since i'm inexperienced at dance recitals, it was hard to get close ups of all the kids while enticipating they eratic movement. friend in the business told me i just need to master a one camera shoot.
Pete Cofrancesco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 13th, 2006, 12:40 AM   #11
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
Jay Rose has a good article on compression at dv.com:
http://dv.com/news/news_item.jhtml?L.../2004/rose0405
*registration required

A compressor would be the most time-efficient way of tackling this problem... perhaps with a little manual mixing thrown in.
Glenn Chan is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Apple / Mac Post Production Solutions > Final Cut Suite


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:41 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network