|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 24th, 2008, 01:30 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West Point, MS
Posts: 313
|
Wildlife HDV camera???
Just wondering, With tens of millions of people doing outdoor activities and millions of people videoing wildlife why hasn't a camera company made a camera marketed to the outdoor wildlife videographer? It seems every camera in HDV format is between a 10X and 14X lens which is not enough for videoing wildlife from a distance(I know get a teleconverter,"havent seen one that doesnt Vignette). I know the V1 and XLH1, A1, and G1 are 20X which is way better but bad in low light. With the EX,240,and Z7 they have done some great work with getting low light capabilities that blow away the 4,5 lux cameras of old. Its a great starting point but someone needs to come out with an out of the box HDV camera with a 20X or better lens that is also good in low light marketed to the outdoor enthusiast, and there are millions of them right now outside videoing and wondering when the right camera for them will arrive.
|
January 24th, 2008, 03:01 PM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,334
|
<<<Just wondering, With tens of millions of people doing outdoor activities and millions of people videoing wildlife why hasn't a camera company made a camera marketed to the outdoor wildlife videographer?>>>
My first guess would be cost. There are solutions available now such as the Canon XL series using adapters and 35mm glass. Yes, a rig like this costs a lot of money, but you can take off the long lens and use it for other purposes which makes for a better over all value. <<<I know the V1 and XLH1, A1, and G1 are 20X which is way better but bad in low light.>>> I would say that there a more than enough light outdoors in 97% of all situations. I usually have to had neutral density filters to get the iris settings I prefer and the H1 is actually pretty good in low light (inside). <<someone needs to come out with an out of the box HDV camera with a 20X or better lens that is also good in low light marketed to the outdoor enthusiast, >> So maybe what you are saying is that Canon should market to the wildlife community? The H1 does have a 20X lens as standard equipment. That said, I find 20X not nearly enough in most situations. Is the H1 too expensive? Well, one can easily spend $50K on a telephoto lens alone, so I would say probably not if you look at what it truly costs to get something a long way off up close and in sharp focus.
__________________
Jacques Mersereau University of Michigan-Video Studio Manager |
January 25th, 2008, 06:25 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lowell MI
Posts: 137
|
Outdoor cam
I can say the many outdoor tv shows including mine are using the XH A1 and it is a dream! the 20x is great and the lowlight is very good, The picture quality is unbelieveable with all the presets available, my fav is (VIVDRGB) and (Outdoor low light i can remember the #)you can make great outdoor films.
I went from a pd 170 and still do use it, to a FX1 which i sold after the first hunt filmed with it, to the A1 and can say i wont be switching, I will be getting another! |
January 25th, 2008, 09:02 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West Point, MS
Posts: 313
|
How do you think the 240 and the Z7 will handle 2/3 inch lenses such as the fuji 18X with built in extender. We went from the DSR 390 to the Z1 a few years ago and have enjoyed getting HDV footage over DVCam but sure do miss the lowlight capabilities and the bayonet 2/3 lens with extender. Just wondering how those 2 new cameras will handle in low light situations flicking on the extender. From what i have heard with the lux rating of both it sounds like it should handle that situation quite well. Wondering also if the adapter for 2/3 inch lenses is beefy or some platic thing.
|
January 26th, 2008, 09:15 PM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pinellas Park
Posts: 232
|
Quote:
|
|
January 28th, 2008, 08:32 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West Point, MS
Posts: 313
|
Thats what I thought, Thanks John. Looks like XDHD is the way to go for what we are trying to accomplish. THX again
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|