|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 26th, 2011, 10:56 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vastervik ,Sweden
Posts: 639
|
DSLR to HQ
Hi
I just updated to Edius 6.05 from 4.6. My main source of media is from DSLR. Is it still need of transcode to HQ? I just finished a short 3 minutes that I edited in native files. Will the transcoded HQ file give my more room for CC or is it the same thing? Are you transcoding or not and if, why? |
October 27th, 2011, 04:26 PM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, Texas U.S.A
Posts: 1,117
|
Re: DSLR to HQ
color correction would be fine using native files. I only convert to HQ if i will do some titling or VFX in AE.
|
October 28th, 2011, 11:24 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vastervik ,Sweden
Posts: 639
|
Re: DSLR to HQ
Thanks Ted!
That is cutting away a lot of time. |
November 9th, 2011, 11:57 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 9,510
|
Re: DSLR to HQ
Depends as well on how powerfull your system is, I actually convert all my videomaterial to HQ just because it runs so smooth afterwards with editing and color correction, especially fast scrolling the timeline is without any hickups. I always render a master HQ file out which I use for further delivery to HD, dvd, web and I use tmpgenc combined with a leadtek winfast transcoding card for this. The rendertimes from a HQ file back to a HQ file are ridiculous fast and saves me a lot of time if I have to make a small editing change and re-render again.
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|