Rendering test's on New system at DVinfo.net

Chad Solo · September 17th, 2007, 10:14 PM

Hello all I have my new system built and running pretty good at this point but I'm little baffled by my raid0 setup. I did two rendering tests on the same file with After Effects CS3 the first test I rendered to the Raid Drive and it rendered out at 2:25 minutes the file size was 3.91 gigs the second test I rendered to the Desktop and it only took 2:04 seconds. I though going to Raid setup speed things up? Maybe something is wrong with my setup. Any suggestions would be so much appreciated.

CS

XP Media Center

ABIT IP35 Pro LGA 775 Intel P35 ATX Intel Motherboard , XFX PVT84JUDD3 GeForce 8600GT 256MB 128-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 SLI Supported Video Card,Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz LGA 775 Processor,MASSCOOL 8WA741 92mm Ball CPU Cooler ,Crucial Ballistix 4GB (4 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit ,System Drive-HITACHI Deskstar T7K500 HDT725050VLA360 (0A33437) 500GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard 2-Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD3200AAKS 320GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive(Raid 0), COOLER MASTER RC-690-KKN1-GP Black SECC/ ABS ATX Mid Tower Computer Case , COOLER MASTER Real Power Pro RS-650-ACAA-A1 ATX12V / EPS12V 650W Power Supply

Duane Burleson · September 17th, 2007, 11:02 PM

Are the original files stored on the Raid? And you are rendering and saving to the same raid? That would be why it took longer.

Your best results would be with the original files stored on the raid and rendering your new video to a different hard drive.

Duane

Chad Solo · September 18th, 2007, 06:13 AM

Thank's for the reply. The save file was on the Raid and thats all I used. The test was just a little 30 second animation I did with a preset so there was no other files. So I should not render to the Raid set up just keep all the original video on that drive. I will give that a try and see how that goes.

Thank's

Chad Solo · September 18th, 2007, 04:35 PM

I just did the same test on my 2 year old system specs below and it took 5:46 to render the same animation so I'm really happy how much faster the new system is. Now I hope to render some HDV and see what the speeds are there.

Old system
intel Pentium 4 640 Prescott 800MHz FSB 2MB L2 Cache LGA 775 EM64T Processor 3.2

ASUS P5AD2-E Premium Socket T (LGA 775) Intel 925XE ATX Intel Motherboard

2 Gigs of Ram

Don Blish · September 20th, 2007, 11:23 AM

Rendering, expecially HD rendering, is far more dependent on CPU throughput than modern SATA disc speeds. The key thing to see if your disc or array is limiting you is to go to the "performance" tab in the task manager (control/alt/delete) and see if you are at 100% CPU utilization. If so, disc, backside and front side bus and RAM speed are not limiting you.

September 17th, 2007, 10:14 PM	#1
Chad Solo Regular Crew Join Date: May 2004 Location: St.Petersburg,Fla Posts: 162	Rendering test's on New system Hello all I have my new system built and running pretty good at this point but I'm little baffled by my raid0 setup. I did two rendering tests on the same file with After Effects CS3 the first test I rendered to the Raid Drive and it rendered out at 2:25 minutes the file size was 3.91 gigs the second test I rendered to the Desktop and it only took 2:04 seconds. I though going to Raid setup speed things up? Maybe something is wrong with my setup. Any suggestions would be so much appreciated. CS XP Media Center ABIT IP35 Pro LGA 775 Intel P35 ATX Intel Motherboard , XFX PVT84JUDD3 GeForce 8600GT 256MB 128-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 SLI Supported Video Card,Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz LGA 775 Processor,MASSCOOL 8WA741 92mm Ball CPU Cooler ,Crucial Ballistix 4GB (4 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit ,System Drive-HITACHI Deskstar T7K500 HDT725050VLA360 (0A33437) 500GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard 2-Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD3200AAKS 320GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive(Raid 0), COOLER MASTER RC-690-KKN1-GP Black SECC/ ABS ATX Mid Tower Computer Case , COOLER MASTER Real Power Pro RS-650-ACAA-A1 ATX12V / EPS12V 650W Power Supply

September 17th, 2007, 11:02 PM	#2
Duane Burleson Regular Crew Join Date: May 2006 Location: Sterling Heights, Michigan Posts: 105	Are the original files stored on the Raid? And you are rendering and saving to the same raid? That would be why it took longer. Your best results would be with the original files stored on the raid and rendering your new video to a different hard drive. Duane

September 18th, 2007, 06:13 AM	#3
Chad Solo Regular Crew Join Date: May 2004 Location: St.Petersburg,Fla Posts: 162	Thank's for the reply. The save file was on the Raid and thats all I used. The test was just a little 30 second animation I did with a preset so there was no other files. So I should not render to the Raid set up just keep all the original video on that drive. I will give that a try and see how that goes. Thank's

September 18th, 2007, 04:35 PM	#4
Chad Solo Regular Crew Join Date: May 2004 Location: St.Petersburg,Fla Posts: 162	I just did the same test on my 2 year old system specs below and it took 5:46 to render the same animation so I'm really happy how much faster the new system is. Now I hope to render some HDV and see what the speeds are there. Old system intel Pentium 4 640 Prescott 800MHz FSB 2MB L2 Cache LGA 775 EM64T Processor 3.2 ASUS P5AD2-E Premium Socket T (LGA 775) Intel 925XE ATX Intel Motherboard 2 Gigs of Ram

September 20th, 2007, 11:23 AM	#5
Don Blish Major Player Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Portland OR Posts: 227	Rendering, expecially HD rendering, is far more dependent on CPU throughput than modern SATA disc speeds. The key thing to see if your disc or array is limiting you is to go to the "performance" tab in the task manager (control/alt/delete) and see if you are at 100% CPU utilization. If so, disc, backside and front side bus and RAM speed are not limiting you.