| 
 
 | |||||||||
|  | 
|  | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
|  April 30th, 2009, 08:51 AM | #1 | 
| Major Player Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Key West 
					Posts: 247
				 | 
				
				Mac Pro Quad core vs: 8 core
			 
			
			I own a Mac 8 core and use it with FCP 6+ to edit footage from and EX1 as well as AVCHD footage from a Canon. All works great...no complaints. Our office needs to get a second mac for work load reasons. Money is tight. Will a Quad core do the job? Does anyone have any experiences with both to offer comparisons in speed with FCP and HD ? Thanks, Craig | 
|   |   | 
|  April 30th, 2009, 09:17 AM | #2 | 
| Inner Circle Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Cambridge UK 
					Posts: 2,853
				 | 
				
				Mac Pro Early 2009 (4 versus 8 core)
			 
			
			Reports I've read suggest Quad is certainly a capable machine.  I'm buying an 8 core (2.66, as this seems the best price performance sweet spot for my needs, but have not got it yet).  I take it you've seen the comparisons on sites such as these?  Well worth reading before you spend the dosh! 4-core versus 8-core Nehalem Mac Pro Pro Apps on Nehalem Mac Pro - Cores? Memory? And follow this thread too (Post 36 is well worth reading re your question)... 2.66 Quad vs 2.93 Quad Buyer's Guide (Includes Octos) - Mac Forums Hope this helps! 
				__________________ Andy K Wilkinson - https://www.shootingimage.co.uk Cambridge (UK) Corporate Video Production | 
|   |   | 
|  April 30th, 2009, 10:21 AM | #3 | 
| Major Player Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Key West 
					Posts: 247
				 | 
				
				Thnaks Andy
			 
			
			I will check out those links...I was not aware of them. I agree that the 8 core bang for the buck is really terrific. We have had ours for just over a year and have been very pleased. Thanks again for the feedback. Best, Craig Key West, Florida Keys, Key West attractions, Florida Keys hotels, Key West Information - Key West Travel Guide and attractions, videos online | 
|   |   | 
|  | 
| 
 | ||||||
| 
 | ||||||
|  |