|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 26th, 2003, 03:01 PM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 57
|
I donīt have a HD display, but...
I donīt have a HD display, but I would like to have the extra resulution to work with in edit and post (pan&scan, and so on).
I am curius about the downconverting process: What does a downconverted image look like when viewed on a regular PAL televsion tube? ( HD -> DV ) does the downconverted HD it look better than odinary DV ? *************************************************** (odinary) DV = 720*576 or (JVC) HD =1280*720 downconverted (in cam) to 720*576 *************************************************** The question: Is the "HD downto DV" nicer when viewed on a regular television tube? Or is regular DV better?? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
August 26th, 2003, 04:42 PM
|
#2 |
|
HDV Cinema
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,007
|
I'm unclear of your question. The JVC HD camcorders are NTSC only.
And your see your editing on an RGB monitor.
__________________
Switcher's Quick Guide to the Avid Media Composer >>> http://home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c |
|
|
|
August 26th, 2003, 05:01 PM
|
#3 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 57
|
------------------------------------
Yes, you are absolutly right! But my question is:
Are the downconverted (JVC)HD nicer than odinary DV when viewed on a regular television tube right from the camcorders S-VHS port? Or is the regular DV mode better?? ..no matter where it is NTSC or PAL |
|
|
|
August 26th, 2003, 07:54 PM
|
#4 |
|
Barry Wan Kenobi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,863
|
Downconverted HD looks much sharper than normal DV mode.
|
|
|
|
August 27th, 2003, 07:57 AM
|
#5 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 57
|
Thanks!
Thanks, that is great news!
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
