|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 16th, 2003, 01:20 AM
|
#1 |
|
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
New Lux Standards?
Is it true about the LUX? (with the HD1U/10U). Then this will make those 1/6" CCD cams a gift from Heaven! This can't be right. The high LUX must just be with the proto-type models, and not what's going to hit North American streets.
|
|
|
March 16th, 2003, 08:48 PM
|
#2 |
|
Obstreperous Rex
|
Hmm... I'm not so sure, Frank... I think these specs are probably right.
|
|
|
|
March 17th, 2003, 12:42 AM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 569
|
This info might be useful for analysis.
The JVC GR-DV2000U (1/4", 1.33MP Progressive Scan CCD) was a flagship 1-CCD released in 2000/2001. Min lux requirement is 18 (eighteen). Has anyone here used it? How's the low-light performance? |
|
|
|
March 17th, 2003, 01:05 AM
|
#4 |
|
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Allan, I have 2 models back from the DV2000. The DVL9500. It has a 1/3" CCD with 360K video effective CCD pixels, 380K total. The DV2000 has a 1/4" CCD with only 340K video effective CCD pixels. Anyway, I'm just shocked that this NEW JVC requires SO much LUX.
|
|
|
|
March 17th, 2003, 01:32 AM
|
#5 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 569
|
Thanks for the correction about pixel count of the 2000U. I forgot that before the HD1, I'd never heard of a megapixel progressive scan CCD cam.
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
