|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 22nd, 2005, 07:45 PM
|
#1 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
A vote for the Chrosziel HD100 Kit
Not a huge earth-shattering piece of news, but I just wanted to mention that I picked up the Chrosziel 450 mattebox/rods kit today, and pass along that it's a really nice piece of work, and worth the money.
Compared to the Cinetech 3 or 4 stage I had rented with the Mini35 the other week, the Chrosziel is 100% more solid, and it's obvious that Chrosziel took the time to make sure that their solution would work perfectly without weird gotchas. The camera adapter plate for instance attaches to the same 4 screws the JVC tripod plate adapter uses...not the 1/4-20 hole. The 4 holes for the JVC plate and 1/4-20 AND a 3/8ths hole are replicated on the bottom side of the adapter plate. It's really well thought out. Pricey, but I expect the mattebox/rods combo will be used on the next at least 2 cameras I own beyond the HD100.
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
|
|
|
November 22nd, 2005, 08:39 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 706
|
I have Chrosziel CF-SS/ST, which is a unit with one rotating and one solid filter frames. No rods, just an adapter ring but works well and it is solid. Also probably a little bit cheaper than Nate's configuration. Yeah, Chrosziel is the way to go, you have my vote Nate!
__________________
www.ascentfilms.com |
|
|
|
|
November 22nd, 2005, 09:13 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
Quote:
Voting, that is. I like the JVC GY-HD100! :-) [p.s.I mean, if you're voting for me, than I'd say "Thanks!".]
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net Last edited by Nate Weaver; November 23rd, 2005 at 01:20 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
