![]() |
Overcranked Slow-motion samples from HD200/250
5 Attachment(s)
Carl Hicks and Keith DeCristo sent me some 720P60 clips to play with recently. I've conformed them to 24P (23.98fps) to see the effects of overcranked slow-motion.
Here's a short segment of Keith's clip of some Kung Fu in either H264 Quicktime (11.3MB) or Windows Media (6.8MB). Here's Carl's clip of a juggler in either H264 Quicktime (15.7MB) or Windows Media (9.3MB). It looks like 1/60th shutter speed was used when at least 1/120th should be used for overcranked slow-mo. Even so, these clips clearly demonstrate that overcranking works very well. I should also mention that Keith's clip came straight from a m2t captured on a DR-HD100, but Carl's had already gone through Premiere Pro 2 and had been re-encoded into m2t before I did anything to it. Therefore, there are some extra compression artifacts. Here is Carl's original sample (49MB) that he had slowed down in Premiere to 50%. I noticed that the frames had been improperly interpolated so I took the first part and conformed it properly to 24P. So how do you shoot your own slow-motion? Here's the method on Apple MacOS X.
MPEG Streamclip has a batch export and Cinema Tools has a batch conform function if you need to process more than one clip at a time. |
Quote:
Tim, I hope I can bother you again to do some web encoding? |
Tim,
Thanks for posting these. Almost doesn't look like slow motion. Its minimal. Would love to see something like running or other really fast motion, slowed down. |
I have another question. Can I shoot a whole movie in 60P and edit it in 24p making some clips slow motion and others not? I use FCP5. I am shooting a small action short and some of it will be slowmotion, but to change camera from 24f to 60f on set between shots may be too time consuming.
|
How about posting the original m2t's please.
|
Quote:
You just need to enter 23.976 into the frame rate box when exporting to quicktime. Mpeg Streamclip will cherry-pick 24 frames out of the 60 and create a new file 24P quicktime. This is similar to a reverse telecine process from a 60i transfer, but of course the math is easier and the process is "dummy proof" because every one of the 60 frames is progressive. You should test it out first and make sure sync is maintained with long clips. I tested this only on Keith's short clip. |
Quote:
http://homepage.mac.com/timdashwood/...lo-mo_test.mov |
Quote:
Right-Click here - 13MB I posted a link to the original m2t Carl sent me in the top post. Unfortunately, it isn't original straight from the camera, but had been through PP2. Carl is going to try to get the original clip for us. |
Great clips, but for some reason the slo-mo didn't look as smooth and filmlike as expected or as smooth as the HVX200 60P footage. Was that because of the shutter speed? I have seen some very smooth SD60P footage with the HD100, and expected the same, but with higher resolution from the HD200/250.
|
Here is the type of slow motion rendition we've been getting from the HD-250. I've added a sample clip with slowed down footage, and on part of the clip I slowed down the audio as well to display how slow it really is. The first part is strobed on purpose.
The clip is 60p with the default shutter speed for 60fps and laid on a 29.97 timeline and then slowed 50%. I'm pleased with the motion rendition so far. Click here for Windows Media HD S.Noe |
Quote:
I can assure you that 720P60 clips, when slowed down properly, are as just as "smooth" as shooting 60fps on film or 60P on the HVX. With that said, I tried playing the clips I posted on my Dual1.2Ghz G4 and I couldn't keep the frame rate constant. However, when I play these clips on a Duo2Ghz Macbook Pro they are as smooth as smooth can be. H264 and WM HD need alot of processing horsepower, especially at the 6-8Mbps rates I used to compress them. Quote:
|
Quote:
Would you mind sending me the original captured m2t of the shot where the gun drops? It looks like your NLE is interpolating the frames and I'd like to try the Mac process on it. |
Quote:
Duke |
Quote:
Also, 60fps isn't really considered that fast when it comes to action movies. 60fps is the norm on most film cameras with a hi-speed capability. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Dalsa Origin can only go as high as 32fps, but the SI-2K seems to be the winner with a max of 72fps in 720P mode. 1080i and 1080PsF cameras generally only have a maximum framerate of 30fps because of the restrictions of 60i (even though some filmmakers have successfully used 1080i60 HDCAM for slow-mo ie:Once Upon A Time in Mexico) The F350 XDCAM HD is the exception and can go as high as "60P" but I think Sony does this by using a single field of 1080i leaving you with 540 lines (Nate, can you please confirm this?) There are hi-speed CCD/CMOS alternatives to hi-speed film cameras, but these are usually specially designed for research and need to be attached to a computer for direct capture to hard drive. Dalsa makes some hi-def chips/cameras that can capture 100fps. I have seen footage from some hi-speed research CCD cameras that can capture as many as 1000fps! The bottom line is that contrary to popular belief, film is far from dead. If you are shooting action scenes and want frame rates higher than 60, your film options are:
|
Quote:
The calculation of perceived speed is playback speed divided by camera speed. In this case 24 divided by 60 = 40% Therefore shooting 60P and playing back at 24P is 40% speed of 'real-time', shooting 50P and playing back at 24P (or 25P) is around 50% speed. Quote:
When you speak of 12fps in the Varicam and HVX200 you are referring to "undercranking" or "fast-motion." It is very easy to undercrank at 12fps on the HD100 by setting the shutter to 1/24th (for equivalent 180° shutter,) shoot in 24P, and then speed the clip up in post by 200%. This will effectively drop every other frame and you will have under-cranked footage shot at 12fps! Think "Keystone Cops." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
A few years ago I saw a demo at IMAX head office of some motion interpolation software they were working on to create smooth slow motion in post production. It was quite convincing - I wonder if they ever went anywhere with it? It still not as ideal as overcranking, but works in a pinch. |
Is it just me or is the kung-fu clip really soft? The juggling clip looks good (if a bit dark) but the kung-fu looks like upconverted SD to me.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
thanks for posting the m2t file, it gave me the chance to do a test. im in europe working with pc and was wondering how to crank with edius pro.
opened a 720p 25 project, imported the m2t file into edius changed the framerate of the 60p clip to 25 in the clip property window, put it on the timeline, voila, nice slowmo. i'm very excited! expect to get the hd200 this week. Thomas |
Quote:
Also I heard that when shooting a music video (on film-mostily) they spreed up the music on the set by 20% shoot the video in 30fps and then in post (editing it in 24fps) they slow the hole video down, about 20% so they keep lip-sync but get a nice dreamlike effect. Has any one done that with the JVC cam. or a HDV cam. for that matter. Sorry about my spelling, I come from a land far far away. |
Quote:
Quote:
I know the math doesn't seem to make sense at first glance, but here's how it works. 30 ÷ 24 = 125% (speed your soundtrack up 25% for on-set playback.) 24 ÷ 30 = 80% (slow your 30P footage down to 80% speed to playback at 23.98fps. Perfect sync will be maintained.) If you really want to make it hard on performers, try running at 50P! The calculations aren't as clean because 50P actually is 50fps, but 24P is only 23.976. So... 50 ÷ 23.976 = 208.5% (speed the soundtrack up to 208.5% speed) 23.976 ÷ 50 = 47.95% (slow the footage down to 47.95% speed for 24P playback in perfect sync.) |
Pouring wine in slow motion - HD200 60P
Here is a test I did with my new 200!
Originally shot at 60p with the iris fully open and a 100/shutter. I've used aspect HD with Premiere so they are not native HDV files and then compressed to sorenson video 3 for web. http://www.andrewkramer.net/60pat24fps.mov This is 60p slowed to 24 frames per second. 47MBs http://www.andrewkramer.net/30ptest.mov This is 60p at 30p in real time. (no slow motion) 19MBs Process: 1. Filmed at 60p with shutter at 1/100 with aperature all the way open 2. (with aspect HD installed) created a new 60P project from the 24p 720p cineform preset and simply changed the frame rate to 60. I'm not sure if this is nenessary but I didn't see an option for 60p at 720p resolution. 3. Opened in After Effects and interpreted the footage as 24p and put on a 24p timeline. Thought I would share. |
Thanks Andrew. I'm going to append this to the stuck thread with the other slow-motion examples.
Can you please explain your process step by step? |
Slowmo with Aspect HD and PP2
I was trying to make a slowmo-clip based on the description in the beginning of this thread, but then discovered it was for Mac users only, since there is no Cinema Tools for PC.
But I captured some 720/50p footage with Aspect HD from my HD201, put it in the Premiere Pro 2 timeline and set the framerate to 25p. It plays back in slowmo and looks really good. But is this just about the same procedure and end-result as described in the beginning of this thread, just for PC? Will it give me the same quality slowmo as with Quicktime and Cinema Tools? |
So I've got a strange issue with this. It's really got me stumped.
I shot a whole bunch of scenes on my GY-HD100 in SD 60p with the intent of slowing it all down using this method. Everything, captures nicely into V-DVHS and looks good when loading into Mpeg Streamclip. However, on the output of Mpeg Streamclip, everything is just a solid green screen. I know I've done this before, so I tried to figure out what it was that i was doing wrong. It seems that the ONLY way that I can get it to work is by using the upscaling feature. If I try to leave it at native resolution it fails every time. I'd prefer not to have to scale this back down in edit, but at least it's going to work! Just thought I'd post a warning to anyone who's in the same situation. |
I'm just curious. In jpg 1 Why did you choose 720p (unscaled) when there was a HD 720p setting?
It looks great, I'm just asking. |
Dead Links
Quote:
|
Now (er soon) the new FCP will incorporate Shake's wonderful Flow technology. Combining Flow interpolation with camera overcranking should allow you to get about as slow as your most "filmic" situations would call for.
|
Quote:
It is pretty cool, but you still have to "send" the clip to motion and apply re-timing. Optical Flow doesn't seem to literally be in the FCP app itself. |
Well, that would be a little disappointing. I know that Smooth Motion is now a plug-in. I could have swore that re-timing could now be done right on the FCP timeline as well, and that behind-the-scenes it will be using the Flow technology.
|
Tim or others,
I tried to capture a 60P clip from my DR-100 into HDVXDV but for some reason it keeps capturing it as a 2 second clip, even though its like a minute. I open HDVXDV and then find the clip on the Firestore DR100 and hit open. It does open it and it does play the full clip, but when trying to export it it only exports as a 2 second clip, not the full clip. What settings do I need to use? |
Quote:
Then use Cinema Tools to conform the new quicktime clip to 23.98fps. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:47 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network