|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 21st, 2012, 12:13 AM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney NSW
Posts: 220
|
JVC 750E Low Light Performance compared to a PanasoniHPX500/502?
Hi all,
Does anyone know how a 750 compares to a Panasonic HPX500/502 in terms of low light capabilities? Has anyone done a direct comparison or simply used both to know how they compare? Thanks in advance, DC |
|
|
|
August 7th, 2012, 02:33 AM
|
#2 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 48
|
Re: JVC 750E Low Light Performance compared to a PanasoniHPX500/502?
I have used both, and all I can say the lowlight capabilities of the HPX500 are far beyond the HM700. No wonder, as the HPX is a 2/3" camera.
|
|
|
|
|
August 7th, 2012, 05:36 AM
|
#3 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 8,441
|
Re: JVC 750E Low Light Performance compared to a PanasoniHPX500/502?
Hi David
There is never any point doing un-realistic comparisons like is the Sony EX3 better than a GoPro...apart from double the chip size we are talking about just an HPX500 body locally that costs $10K (never mind a decent lens which according to my taste would add another $15K ...so to compare a Prosumer 1/3" CCD chip camera costing $5K with a Broadcast camera five times the price with 2/3" chips isn't going to help anyone. As far as I remember you have a 500??? You really cannot expect anything like the JVC or Panny AC-160 to come even close!!! Chris |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
