|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: anytown USA
Posts: 58
|
4:2:2 uncompressed or SD Cards????
Does anyone using the JVC 700's through 850's use external recorders to get 4:2:2 uncompressed? Or is the difference in quality negligible?
Just wondering, $ investment wise if it would make a huge improvement in picture quality? On some shoots I would want everything I can get quality wise, on others I probably don't need the best of the best, the SD cards would work fine. Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Huntsville, Al
Posts: 15
|
Re: 4:2:2 uncompressed or SD Cards????
We use both with our 790. For normal stuff, I'll shoot on the SD card. If I need the extra quality (like green screen shoots), I"ll use a Hyperdeck.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: anytown USA
Posts: 58
|
Re: 4:2:2 uncompressed or SD Cards????
Then there is a noticeable visual difference between the two? I would guess for news it would be fine, but if you are looking to shoot a 1/2 hour documentary, it would be wise to shoot 422 uncompressed?
Thanks for the input! Mike |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Huntsville, Al
Posts: 15
|
Re: 4:2:2 uncompressed or SD Cards????
It really depends on what the subject of the documentary is. If there is a lot of movement, yeah, go for the higher bitrate or even uncompressed. But if there isn't, recording directly to the SD card may be just fine.
And even when I use the Hyperdeck, I'm capturing using the DNxHD codec at 220Mbps, not truly uncompressed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: anytown USA
Posts: 58
|
Re: 4:2:2 uncompressed or SD Cards????
Thanks for the info. It probably depends on how much storage space you want to fill up too?
Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|