Losing quality from dubbing? at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > The Long Black Line

The Long Black Line
Tape, tape and more tape; and decks; HDV, DV, VHS and more.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 16th, 2006, 09:49 PM   #1
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hammond, LA
Posts: 84
Losing quality from dubbing?

If I'm dubbing a MiniDV tape from one deck to another, will there be a degredation of quality on my new dub. I ask this because my engineer was reluctant to make dubs, saying that I'll lose quality. His reasoning was this: The first deck has to DECODE the DV signal recorded to tape, then it sends it to the next deck, which then has to re-encode this signal back to the MiniDV codec. During this re-encoding process, it can throw away information that the original tape had captured.

Is there any truth to this, or will it dub over EXACTLY is its original was encoded?
Bryan Aycock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2006, 11:33 PM   #2
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 352
As long as you record via Firewire the dub will be a bit-for-bit copy of the original. If you went analog then, yes, you'd lose a generation, but using FW makes it no different than copying a file from one hard drive to another.

Andrew Kimery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 17th, 2006, 01:59 AM   #3
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sitka Alaska
Posts: 128
This is a point that raises a few subtle issues.
Firewire is a digital copy and in theory, it is just like copying a file from one media to another.
BUT and this is an interesting but, the firewire transfer does not have any hand shake or way to have a block of data retransmitted. So if in fact any errors occur during the transfer, or during the copying of the file to the media on the other end, then in fact you do not get a bit for bit copy. The dv codecs are very good at correcting and reconstructing errors, but it is not like copying to a disk drive where if there is an error the date is re sent, and were you can impliment a read after write to make sure of the written date.

This is why for instance on another thread that did not get any comment re DVRACK for instance I was asking for a simple implimention in the software to report the amount of error correction the dv codec is doing.

Sharyn Ferrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 17th, 2006, 03:07 PM   #4
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,570
Well the error correction would be done in the playout device. Once the data is sent down the 1394 interface that information is probably not available. Much the same thing happens when data is digitally transmitted over reliable connections, for example as far as I know there's no error detection / correction on the IDE interface between disk drives and the controller. The disk itself does do a lot of error correction but that's invisible outside the disk (I think). SCSI drives do report that errors were corrected and the bus interface does have a parity bit although mostly not used / ignored.
The type of protols you're referring to are mostly used on communication paths that are error prone, RF and modems being a good example. These protocols do have an overhead which is probably why they're not used on things like firewire or SDI.
Bob Grant is offline   Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > The Long Black Line

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:26 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2020 The Digital Video Information Network