DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Nikon Photo for HD Video (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/nikon-photo-hd-video/)
-   -   Nikon D90 has 720p24 over HDMI (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/nikon-photo-hd-video/128802-nikon-d90-has-720p24-over-hdmi.html)

Christopher Drews September 13th, 2008 04:19 PM

5 minute limit or not, this is fantastic news.

Can someone answer three questions though :

1) Is HDMI a format which only allows transmission of data inside a 60i stream (much like HD-SDI which is always a 60i stream from a camera such as XL-H1)?
This is important because the D90 would have to be de-interlaced to remove the pulldown if you wanted to avoid the motion JPEG codec.

2) Is this camera full frame since it is 12.3MP? What is the MegaPixel count have to be for full frame to be an option? Does it zoom into the SLR lens even when in movie mode? If I place a 50mm Zeiss Planar, will it really become a 60mm because of a zoom factor?

3) The Japanese night footage looks most impressive (to me). Can someone breakdown why this chip can detect low light better than a 3 CCD camera? I thought the more CCD's you have in a camcorder, the better low light response you'd get. The Airport footage is a stunning example of an extremely sensitive low light chip, but isn't this just one single image sensor? How could this possibly better than the three in a HVX-200 or an EX1?

Thanks for your thoughts,
-C

Jon Fairhurst September 13th, 2008 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christopher Drews (Post 934348)
Can someone breakdown why this chip can detect low light better than a 3 CCD camera?

The difference is the sensor size. A bigger sensor means more photons fall on each pixel during a given period of time, all else being equal.

The D90 sensor is roughly 24mm x 16mm - about the same size as in the Red One.

Chris Hurd September 14th, 2008 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christopher Drews (Post 934348)
Is HDMI a format..?

HDMI is not a format. It is an interface.

Quote:

2) Is this camera full frame since it is 12.3MP?
No it is NOT full frame.

Quote:

What is the MegaPixel count have to be for full frame to be an option?
Pixel count has nothing to do with it. It's the physical *size* of the sensor, not the number of pixels, that determines whether it's full frame or not.

Dan Chung September 14th, 2008 03:41 AM

I've just posted my latest results from the D90 here D90 goes partying on Vimeo. This time it is all handheld with Voigtlander 58mm f1.4 manual lens.

I am truly amazed by the low light performance, it puts any handycam I've got to shame. There would be just no way to get this using a HV30 or EX-1 and a DOF adapter, not to mention it is just so much more discreet.

Vincent Oliver September 14th, 2008 04:15 AM

The low light material looks impressive (exposure). From most of the clips I have been seeing, including yours Dan, there seems to be a lack of critical focus, this could be due to the fact it has been compressed for Vimeo - YouTube etc. Can you confirm whether the focus is spot on or is the footage soft. I know we are supposed to be looking at a shallow DOF, but I would expect at least one element to be sharp.

Dan Chung September 14th, 2008 04:53 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Focus is not always spot on, however its not bad. There is obviously a quality loss with Vimeo as with any other online video, btw are you watching vimeo with scaling on? it tends to make it look even mushier.

So you get an idea of the actual quality I've attached some still frames.

Dan

Dan Chung September 14th, 2008 04:55 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Another one

Dan Chung September 14th, 2008 04:56 AM

1 Attachment(s)
and one more, remember this is not shot in scientific conditions, it is a real world test.

Vincent Oliver September 14th, 2008 05:10 AM

Thanks for posting those images Dan. Unfortunately they do confirm my view that then images are not as sharp as could be. Do you focus via the viefinder or is it via the LIve View preview. I also believe that autofocus does not function with the video mode, can you confirm this, or correct me.


I am still waiting for my D90 to arrive so I will do some extensive tests with it.

Thanls

Dan Chung September 14th, 2008 05:22 AM

Focussing is done on the live view screen when handheld, you can only use the viewfinder for focus static shots on a tripod where you can prefocus (AF or manual) then enter Liveview. On static shots you can also magnify the live view to check focus before you start to shoot, but this function is disabled when you start shooting.

Don't forget that in low light a lot of what you might think is mis-focus is also movement, noise reduction and compression at work, that said it would be nice if they added some enhancements like peaking or focus assist to help as the 3 inch screen is not all that easy to get critical focus with on moving subjects.

Vincent Oliver September 14th, 2008 05:32 AM

Thanks again Dan,

"Focussing is done on the live view screen"


from the various videos I have seen I though this was the case. I think this may be a severe limitation for those photographers/cameramen who saw the D90 as a "One Stop - do it all creative centre"

I know Canon are show casing their new camera this week, maybe this will have some features that may make me change my mind as to which camera is going to be the one for me.

Having voiced my views on the D90, I still think it is a pioneering acheivement and another turning point for photography. Your movie compilation of the party is very good, and viewers should also take into consideration that this was all shot in very low light and hand held.

Martin Labelle September 14th, 2008 07:18 AM

Could somebody explain the process(from camera to edit)
 
I am convinced by the quality now.
but just a simple question, I would like to know how do you bring the clip from the memory card to the edit software. Also does it have to render ?

Jon Fairhurst September 14th, 2008 07:27 AM

I wonder, is the HDMI output active during video capture? If so, an HDMI monitor is the solution for those who want critical focus.

Vincent Oliver September 14th, 2008 08:03 AM

"Focussing is done on the live view screen"


from the various videos I have seen so far, I thought that auto focus was indeed turned off during video capture. Footage that I have seen desn't quite hit the focus mark in many clips. From my own experience, HD requires more critical focussing than SD. This could be be a severe limitation for photographers/cameramen.

I know Canon are showing their new camera this week (on the 17) , maybe it will have some extra features, hopefull video catpture, that may make me change my mind as to which camera is going to be the one for me.

However, I suspect we are going to have to wait for the next generation of cameras to have sonme useful features - ext. Mic socket (mini jack would be OK)), continuous autofocus, longer recording times - I would be more than happy to pay the tax difference (if this is the reason for 5 minute max recording time).

I hope to have the D90 within the next 7 - 10 days and I will publish a full review of it on photo-i.co.uk - no stone will be left unturned.

Having voiced my views on the D90, I still think it is a pioneering acheivement and another turning point for photography.

M. Paul El-Darwish September 14th, 2008 05:39 PM

Very impressive indeed. Some details would be helpful.
- You were manual focusing the Voigtlander 58mm f1.4
Have you shot footage that you like with another lens set in autofocus?
- Does the D90 have image stabilization? Was that used?
- I wonder if a steadycam would have helped at all?


Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Chung (Post 934485)
I've just posted my latest results from the D90 here D90 goes partying on Vimeo. This time it is all handheld with Voigtlander 58mm f1.4 manual lens.

I am truly amazed by the low light performance, it puts any handycam I've got to shame. There would be just no way to get this using a HV30 or EX-1 and a DOF adapter, not to mention it is just so much more discreet.


Gints Klimanis September 14th, 2008 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vincent Oliver (Post 934548)
However, I suspect we are going to have to wait for the next generation of cameras to have sonme useful features - ext. Mic socket (mini jack would be OK)), continuous .

Nikon already has a USB jack. Some firmware changes would allow for USB microphones, though I'd prefer a stereo XLR->USB interface.

Gints Klimanis September 14th, 2008 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M. Paul El-Darwish (Post 934749)
Very impressive indeed. Some details would be helpful.
- You were manual focusing the Voigtlander 58mm f1.4
Have you shot footage that you like with another lens set in autofocus?
- Does the D90 have image stabilization? Was that used?
- I wonder if a steadycam would have helped at all?

The D90 doesn't have built-in image stabilization. There is some hope of VR lenses providing this function, but from the footage I've seen, VR stabilization seems jumpy.

Wacharapong Chiowanich September 14th, 2008 08:55 PM

From the footage and framegrabs I've seen so far I think the following is obviously the downsides of the camera as a camcorder:

1. No manual exposure control
2. Focusing is manual only and it forces you to rely on the live view with no effective focusing aids to focus. Luckily the video output is a low bit rate M-JEG at 720p. If it were recorded at any high enough data rate using superior codecs such as Mpeg-2 or H.264 at 1080i/p, miss-focusing will be more obvious and will happen very frequently with just slow moving subjects.
3. Nikon's VR in the lenses is optimized for still photography and it already showed its weaknesses in the clips posted on the dpreview.com site. Whether Nikon may or can later on tweak the firmware in either the lenses or the camera to correct this, I'm not sure.

There might be something else if you look for but the camera is a good hybrid considering the cost and it's limited potential applications.

Wacharapong

Gints Klimanis September 15th, 2008 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wacharapong Chiowanich (Post 934796)
2. Focusing is manual only and it forces you to rely on the live view with no effective focusing aids to focus. Luckily the video output is a low bit rate M-JEG at 720p. If it were recorded at any high enough data rate using superior codecs such as Mpeg-2 or H.264 at 1080i/p, miss-focusing will be more obvious and will happen very frequently with just slow moving subjects.

This is similar to the camcorder world, so we can't expect much. I've had a very difficult time confirming focus on Sony Z1/EX1 HDV camcorders even with the zoom-in and peaking focusing aids. All of these cameras will need significantly larger screens, so the HDMI will have to drive an 11+" external HD display. Cumbersome, but necessary.

Ger Griffin September 15th, 2008 06:47 AM

We all want shallow depth of field yet at the same time we want perfect auto focus.
I think its great because i get to strap on an old style lens and manually focus the way I learned all those years ago.
Its revolved back to being a skill again, for the moment.
Im off to the opticians.

Phil Bloom September 15th, 2008 06:55 AM

what sequence settings are people using in FCP to edit the footage?

Vincent Oliver September 15th, 2008 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ger Griffin (Post 934929)
We all want shallow depth of field yet at the same time we want perfect auto focus.
I think its great because i get to strap on an old style lens and manually focus the way I learned all those years ago.
Its revolved back to being a skill again, for the moment.
Im off to the opticians.


You have a good point, but then we could take it one step further and go back to the darkroom. Technonolgy has moved on and we have come to expect a certain amount of automation. From my point of view I thgink I could live with the lack of autofocus, but I doubt if a sports or wildlife photographer would share the same opinion.

I am still waiting for my D90, hope to have it by the end of the week. Can anyone tell me how fast can you switch between normal focusing mode and Live View ready to shoot video, or better still can the custom Function be set up so it switches instantly?

Did your D90 turn up today Philip?

Phil Bloom September 15th, 2008 11:24 AM

yes it arrived today. Done a little bit of shooting...god it's hard work! No replacement for a video camera but I will report back on how sharp the image is

Vincent Oliver September 15th, 2008 12:38 PM

I usually become sceptical when things sound too good to be true, rarely do they meet expectations. I am not that cynical, just seen too many claims from over enthusiastic users and manufacturers.

Would be interested to hear about your findings Philip - maybe I shouldn't put off buying the EX3 after all.

Phil Bloom September 15th, 2008 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vincent Oliver (Post 935078)
I usually become sceptical when things sound too good to be true, rarely do they meet expectations. I am not that cynical, just seen too many claims from over enthusiastic users and manufacturers.

Would be interested to hear about your findings Philip - maybe I shouldn't put off buying the EX3 after all.

It's no video camera replacement at all. The rolling shutter is atrocious and the limitations are many, but treat it right and you can get nice pics out it. Very compressed though.

Take a look here for a short overvew and a video of some shots I did.

Philip Bloom Blog Archive Nikon D90

Christopher Drews September 15th, 2008 04:09 PM

Wow Phil. I see what you mean about the footage and compression. It was most noticeable on your bridge shot (the bottom of the archway is stair stepping). Any chance you've verified that the HDMI output is live output without overlay? Could the rolling shutter be bypassed by recording into an Intensity Pro / Flash recorder? Aside from the lack of manual control, are all these problems based on the D90's D-Video codec?

Thanks,
-C

Jim Giberti September 15th, 2008 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vincent Oliver (Post 935078)
I usually become sceptical when things sound too good to be true, rarely do they meet expectations. I am not that cynical, just seen too many claims from over enthusiastic users and manufacturers.

Would be interested to hear about your findings Philip - maybe I shouldn't put off buying the EX3 after all.

I'll be honest, I was literally about to order two D90s until I heard about the ISO, shutter speed issues. I didn't expect the mjpeg to be equivalent to my current HD100 output but after all the work we've done with big cameras with the Mini35 and Letus attached, the D90's promise was/is really attractive for any number of reasons.

But (and it is, of course, qualified but at this stage) the new Panasonic mini 4/3 DSLR format looks like it COULD be what I really hoped the D90 was when I first learned of it. The new G1 has, in theory, already solved the biggest short coming for me and the soon to be released version with HD movie and a dedicated 4/3 lens able to grab focus on the fly seems that it could resolve the others

Here are the three big disappointments with the D90 for me in order of importance:

No shooting through a VF.
No ability to compose and expose your exact shot and then start filming.
No ability to use SLR quality AF to regularly refocus HD shooting.

If it had everything else going for it, I'd live with composing and shooting with the 3" screen hand held. It's a wash with any tripod or jib shots...they're going to feed out to a monitor anyway.

But the idea, as both a photographer and film maker, to merge the best of both worlds meant looking through my viewfinder, getting my composition, exposure using Nikon's AF to lock my shot and then hitting record.

With an image stabilized lens, I could see shooting this camera photographer style easily. What a light, comfortable, unobtrusive way to film that would be. But it's a no-go with any future DSLR offerings because of the optical shutter. SAme thing with any AF use...the optical system makes it a no-go ever.

The shutter, ISO...even the mjpeg issues I would expect Nikon to address in firmware updates. Or to specifically retain for an updated D3 or dedicated bigger $ offering. But they will still never allow for VF shooting, AF refocus or any of the really tantalizing possibilities (like sophisticated subject tracking) that the new mini 4/3 all digital standard is introducing to photography and HD.

Panasonic just introduced the "mini" 4/3 system themselves that removes the prism and optical path of sll DSLRs. In addition to allowing for much slimmer bodies and smaller lenses, they developed a new EFV with and effective 1.4 million dot resolution that is supposed to rival the best optical VFs with the ability to do unheard of things in the eye piece in terms of control.

The new contrast detection system that they also had to develop for the all digital platform, allows for some amazing features. For one thing, because it's completely digital, the auto focus will work in movie mode (I've never used auto focus for any motion shooting but given the critical focus needed for HD, the ability to use DSLR quality AF to re-focus as needed would be killer.) It also has tantalizing possibilities with an assignable subject tracking, face recognition and a bunch of other things specific to the new contrast AF system.


And how about the ability to see DOF and shutter speed effects in your hi res VF before shooting - these features are also already in the new G1.

If panasonic is able to move all of these things to the new HD version of the G1 it could be the dream 1st generation cross over camera. But the direct EVF movie shooting and focus on the fly already promised for the HD version makes it a totally next level tool vs the D90.

So I'll probably get a D90 and get the Panasonic when it comes out supposedly 1st quarter.

Jim Giberti September 15th, 2008 04:51 PM

Hey Phillip
 
I'm just watching your D90 piece. Not surprisingly it's the best focused, composed and exposed footage I've seen. Given the restrictions and newness, it still looks reasonably similar to some of the great work I've seen of yours.

How did you adapt to the Live View shooting and the new 3" screen...did you try anything hand held?

Did you get the body only or with the 18-105mm?

I'm getting one this week as a new DSLR anyway, but you've encouraged me as far as it's possibilities given it's limitations...does that make sense?.

Jim

Phil Bloom September 15th, 2008 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Giberti (Post 935206)
I'm just watching your D90 piece. Not surprisingly it's the best focused, composed and exposed footage I've seen. Given the restrictions and newness, it still looks reasonably similar to some of the great work I've seen of yours.

How did you adapt to the Live View shooting and the new 3" screen...did you try anything hand held?

Did you get the body only or with the 18-105mm?

I'm getting one this week as a new DSLR anyway, but you've encouraged me as far as it's possibilities given it's limitations...does that make sense?.

Jim

As a new DSLR it's great as a replacement for a video camera it s not! Am sure I can get better now I know how to lock exposure and will take a better tripod with me next time!

I got the kit as the body only was out of stock.

handheld i didnt try, the screen was ok, i zoomed in a lot to check focus. Overall its just about usable for focus

Phil Bloom September 15th, 2008 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christopher Drews (Post 935189)
Wow Phil. I see what you mean about the footage and compression. It was most noticeable on your bridge shot (the bottom of the archway is stair stepping). Any chance you've verified that the HDMI output is live output without overlay? Could the rolling shutter be bypassed by recording into an Intensity Pro / Flash recorder? Aside from the lack of manual control, are all these problems based on the D90's D-Video codec?

Thanks,
-C

Yep, its a very low bit rate. So this is probably the main culprit, there are a lot of video artifacts

Vincent Oliver September 16th, 2008 02:28 AM

Just as a thought. I don't see the D90 as a replacement to a video camcorder, it is however a useful camera to have for the odd drop in shot here and there, especially if you need to use wide angle lenses. Fortunately I didn't sell my collection of older style Nikkor lenses (18 lenses ranging from 20mm through to 500mm Reflex Nikkor). These will now all have a second life.

I can see the potential for the D90, although two years down the line I am sure we will have something more spectacular.

Regarding focusing via Live View, it wouldn't take the genius of a brain surgeon to work out how to attach an inexpensive X8 or X4 loupe to the rear LCD screen guard, something along similar lines to the flip down magnifier on the Sony EX3.

Jon Fairhurst September 16th, 2008 01:06 PM

My only questions regarding the D90 now concern the HDMI output. I'm looking forward to somebody capturing it and determining:

* How's the picture look without compression? (Are the artifacts that we've seen due to subsampling the sensor, or due to M-JPEG encoding?)
* Can you configure the HDMI output to be 720p (vs. 1080i)? What's the default?
* Can you turn off the graphics overlay? (I believe not.)
* Does the overlay still allow for Cinemascope or similar aspect ratios?

Hopefully, somebody can do an HDMI capture and post some stills...

Jim Giberti September 16th, 2008 02:08 PM

So this new Panasonic 4/3 camera is in fact going to use AVCHD and shoot progressively.
That's confirmed so far.

Any thoughts on AVCHD vs mjpeg?

Obviously we're talking two different cameras but codec to codec.

Kurth Bousman September 16th, 2008 02:49 PM

What I've read so far the pany g1 doesnt yet do video at all - I believe they said something like "next generation" it's coming. I could be wrong but that's what I recall. After Photokina the smoke will clear alittle./k

Gints Klimanis September 16th, 2008 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil Bloom (Post 935327)
Yep, its a very low bit rate. So this is probably the main culprit, there are a lot of video artifacts

It would be very useful to inspect a short MJPEG file straight from the camera.

Here is another D90 movie:
http://vimeo.com/1709082

Would you folks kindly point out rolling shutter artifacts? I see some at 0:44 on the "Union Station via Street Corridor" blinking sign. Most of the wobble is during the handheld footage. I'm guessing that the jerkiness is made worse by VR in the lens.

Steven Thomas September 16th, 2008 04:33 PM

Hmm.
This may be just the what Nikon needs to get into the video cam market.

If they took their basis of this implementation and worked on it as a platform for their next post D90 model, it could be quite amazing. Also, I imagine a software upgrade could offer better video quality. Also, most important, enable at least full 4:2:2 1920x1080 via HDMI without icon overlays.

The feedback from this forum alone could provide enough infomation for their engineers.

It's appararent that Nikon wanted to take their video mode one step further with the D90. It's to bad that it may only tease us, especially with having the awesome capability of tight DOF, but no way of capturing this image in high quality video!

I can see this concept easily turning upcoming cameras into hybrid Digital SLR / Pro video camera. Bring'em on!

Christopher Drews September 16th, 2008 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Fairhurst (Post 935629)
My only questions regarding the D90 now concern the HDMI output. I'm looking forward to somebody capturing it and determining:

* How's the picture look without compression? (Are the artifacts that we've seen due to subsampling the sensor, or due to M-JPEG encoding?)
* Can you configure the HDMI output to be 720p (vs. 1080i)? What's the default?
* Can you turn off the graphics overlay? (I believe not.)
* Does the overlay still allow for Cinemascope or similar aspect ratios?

Hopefully, somebody can do an HDMI capture and post some stills...

I'm convinced everyone who has this camera and a intensity pro (loads of people) all had a little meeting and decided that when people ask about the HDMI output quality, they agreed just to ignore them. Adding to the frustration, some people started roomers of burned overlays and subpar HDMI quality. I feel like Jack's screaming "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"
-C

Jim Giberti September 16th, 2008 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kurth Bousman (Post 935672)
What I've read so far the pany g1 doesnt yet do video at all - I believe they said something like "next generation" it's coming. I could be wrong but that's what I recall. After Photokina the smoke will clear alittle./k

No, there's a lot more substance to it than that. Basically all the info In my long post is from their site which has a section on the upcoming HD version of the G1 with video clips, and their Japanese site with promo material from a Japanese photo show. I have pictures from show of the HD camera and the 14 -140mm HD lens. There's very specific info out including my quote that it will shoot progressive and auto focus on the fly (from the US site) and that the codec is AVCHD - the logo is right on the back of the LCD. I can also tell you that it has a stereo mic as that is mounted right on top of the camera in another picture from Panasonic Japan.

Ger Griffin September 16th, 2008 06:43 PM

D90 for SD DVD stuff
 
what about for final output to sd-dvd.
How would the footage 'fit in' with say a few sd shots from an xha1 or ex1 used in SD mode?
Aside from the mentioned complaints like rolling shutter and general lack of control,
are the arefacts so noticeable that even SD looks bad?
If anyone has tried this - downconverting/downscaling (preferably with a high quality method such as Aftereffects) , mixing/cutting together with other sd footage & burning to DVD could you please give opinions of the results.
Thanks.

Ken Hodson September 16th, 2008 09:46 PM

I would recommend checking out a few of the many clips available. You should be able to formulate your own opinion on what works for you based on what you see in this regard. I have read that vimeo clips can be D/L at full rez, but I can't figure out how, but there should be many shared native D90 clips that you can import into your own projects to check for SD output. If you do please share your opinion.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:53 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network