Video Resolution at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Windows / PC Post Production Solutions > Non-Linear Editing on the PC

Non-Linear Editing on the PC
Discussing the editing of all formats with Matrox, Pinnacle and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 8th, 2004, 12:47 PM   #1
New Boot
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 5
Video Resolution

Hello, this is my first time posting on this message board, though I've read it quite a bit since becoming interested in video. I have a problem, and please forgive me if the question sounds stupid, I'm still fairly new to all of this.

My footage, recorded on a Canon GL2, is 720x480. In the original footage, the frame size looks basically square. When I export a finished video from Premiere in Microsoft DV AVI form, it stays this same size. When I export in any compressed form, though, it stretches the picture out horizontally, even when it is exported at the original resolution. It would seem that the original footage is not actually a 4:3 ratio, but the compressed output video is, which causes it to stretch. I was wondering if there is any way to fix this and make the compressed output closer to the original "square" size of the frame.

Thank you,

Kevin Buckelew

edit: eep, I'm sorry for posting in the wrong forum.
Kevin Buckelew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 8th, 2004, 08:36 PM   #2
Wrangler
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vallejo, California
Posts: 4,049
I think you have a setting wrong either in your NLE or in your display device.

SD video is normally 4:3. It sounds like your system is attempting to display it at an expected 16:9 by stretching it horizonally.

I don't understand what you mean by 'compressed form.' DV by definition is compressed. Do you mean something like MPEG?
__________________
Mike Rehmus
Hey, I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel!
Mike Rehmus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2004, 02:10 AM   #3
RED Code Chef
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
What you are probably running into is pixel aspect ratio. NTSC
4:3 DV has an aspect ratio of 0.9. So your resolution of 720x480
is actually played back (if done correctly) at 648x480!

Now MPEG(2) has the same pixel aspect but I do think Windows
Media Player does NOT play it back correctly (you can more easily
see this with SVCD's). Open your MPEG in a software DVD player
to see it correctly.

Are you going to DVD? Then you should watch the final product
on a TV and/or in a software DVD player. Not in WMP for example.

Anyway, this might not be what you are talking about as Mike
also expressed. Can you be a bit more specific?
__________________

Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com
DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef

Join the DV Challenge | Lady X

Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors
Rob Lohman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2004, 02:20 AM   #4
New Boot
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 5
When I said compressed, I meant into anything other than the original DV form (in my case, I tried it in Quicktime and Windows Media compressed AVI). I don't think it's stretching it out to 16:9 though, it just seems that the 4:3 differs between the two, and I'm not sure why. I definitely exported it at 4:3. The original footage does not look like it's 720x480, that's what is confusing to me. 720x480 would be a noticeably rectangular shape, but the original footage looks completely square. I don't understand this because I'm positive that they are both supposed to be the same resolution.
Kevin Buckelew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2004, 02:24 AM   #5
New Boot
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 5
I replied before seeing your post, Rob. That would explain it. Unfortunately, I can't really control how the file is viewed because it's for the web (which is why I was compressing it). I guess I'll have to cope with it. Thank you both very much for the help.
Kevin Buckelew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2004, 02:26 AM   #6
RED Code Chef
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
Where is this 16:9 in your last post coming from? I'm a bit confused
as to what you are getting at. I explained earlier that you are
getting 648x480 which is square on a 4:3 monitor. I'm just not
sure what happens after this in your case. If you can host some
screenshots that might help. Otherwise you can e-mail them to
me as well.
__________________

Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com
DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef

Join the DV Challenge | Lady X

Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors
Rob Lohman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9th, 2004, 12:21 PM   #7
New Boot
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 5
The 16:9 was responding to Mike Rehmus, who said that it might be stretching it from 4:3 to 16:9.

After taking some screenshots, it would appear that it's actually stretching it from 720x480 to 760x480, even though I'm exporting it as 720x480.

The original correct 4:3 ratio:
http://www.kevinbuckelew.com/original.jpg

And then the stretched one after compressing it with Windows Media:
http://www.kevinbuckelew.com/wmcompressed.jpg

When I was looking at it before, I thought it was more of a difference because the original DV footage displayed as basically a perfect square on my windows media player (which means it must have been making it less wide than it was supposed to be), but this (first) screenshot came from Premiere so it's the correct 4:3 ratio.
Kevin Buckelew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2004, 02:00 AM   #8
RED Code Chef
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
What project settings do you have? Can you tell us the exact
(ALL) settings you did for the WM export?
__________________

Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com
DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef

Join the DV Challenge | Lady X

Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors
Rob Lohman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2004, 02:25 AM   #9
New Boot
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 5
Well, I feel stupid now. Looking at the settings just now I realized I had chosen the seemingly logical "D1/DV NTSC (0.9)" pixel aspect ratio, and the "Square Pixels (1.0)" setting solved the problem. It's probably more complicated than that, but for now it seems to have worked. Thank you very much for your help, I really appreciate it.
Kevin Buckelew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2004, 02:29 AM   #10
RED Code Chef
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
When exporting you should use 1.0 pixel aspect ratio indeed
(for things like WM or QuickTime) since computer screens are 1.0
PA. If you where to export to MPEG2 for DVD authoring you would
still use 0.9 since DVD's are meant to be played on TV's etc.

Glad you solved your issue!
__________________

Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com
DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef

Join the DV Challenge | Lady X

Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors
Rob Lohman is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Windows / PC Post Production Solutions > Non-Linear Editing on the PC

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network