|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 10th, 2008, 01:22 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 57
|
how do i prevent this?
i keep having problems with this ghosting on moving images, is there a way to prevent it?
http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...sid/Image1.jpg hope someone can help thanks |
April 10th, 2008, 01:45 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 35
|
Increase the shutter speed maybe....
|
April 10th, 2008, 02:12 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
What camera are you shooting with Kev?
|
April 10th, 2008, 02:17 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 57
|
|
April 10th, 2008, 02:20 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
That's interlace artifacts. On a progressive display, you are seeing 2 fields (at the same time) shot 1/50th of a second apart. You can deinterlace the footage or shoot 25F to get rid of that on a progressive display.
|
April 10th, 2008, 02:28 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 256
|
You don't mention what editing program you are using, but if it is showing up just with slow motion footage I would guess that the ghosting in caused by frame blending. Since the A1 can't overcrank, when you slow it down it has to take the existing frames and do some form of duplication. For example, if you slow it down to 50% the software could just duplicate each frame so it is showing twice instead of once. When you view this at normal speed the footage looks slowed down. Since this simple form of slow motion can look jerky many programs will 'blend' frames, meaning rather than simply duplicating the previous frame they create a new frame by blending the previous frame with the next frame. Depending on how well the software does this you can get ghosting like is shown in your example.
The problem can also be caused by the software creating a progressive image from an interlaced one. Although you can see it in the frame you posted, when you view the video at normal viewing speed you may not notice it. |
April 10th, 2008, 02:36 PM | #7 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
Take a frame grab from a 1080 line interlaced video (2 fields 1/50th of a second apart), of something moving quickly, shot at a high shutter speed, resize the image to 439 lines and a it will look like that every time.
|
April 10th, 2008, 02:45 PM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
The posted image is deceptive, because resizing has effectively blended the fields (which eliminates the interlace lines you would see in the full size image).
|
April 10th, 2008, 03:27 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 57
|
your loosing me a bit :-/
im down converting my footage from the a1 and editing in sony vegas pro 8 on my footage propertys it says that its lower field first so i set my project propertys to that and have it set to interpolate fields what would you recomend i change? |
April 10th, 2008, 03:36 PM | #10 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
Deinterlace the footage before downsizing it.
|
April 10th, 2008, 03:38 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 57
|
im downconverting it direct from the camera using the downconvert function
should i render the footage before i edit? |
April 10th, 2008, 04:39 PM | #12 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
To get rid of that ghosting effect, you'll need to capture it as HDV, rather than have the camera convert it to DV for capture.
|
April 10th, 2008, 04:41 PM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 57
|
ok thanks i will give it a try and play around a bit
thanks for your time |
April 10th, 2008, 04:49 PM | #14 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
I don't know what I was thinking there for a minute. (I'm in rough shape today - having a lot of pain.) You could deinterlace the DV downconverted by the camera for capture, but it would work a lot better to deinterlace the original recorded HDV. A simple method would be to discard a field. You could also deinterlace to 50p, which would be great for slow-mo, but that would get more involved (and take more work).
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|