|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 17th, 2003, 04:35 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Glendale CA
Posts: 328
|
What Brand Hard Drive do you Recommend?
I searched on the forums for hard drive recommendations, but I couldn't find anything. So here is a thread dedicated to it.
I am looking specifically for an internal ATA 7200RPM drive. Gig size really isn't that important, just as long as it is over 60. What brands have you guys and gals had the best luck with? I think we can all agree that the majority of hard drive purchases are probably based on "luck". The one that just died on my system was a Maxtor, and it was around 8 to 10 months old. I have never had a Maxtor fail before, or any other brand for that matter. I am going hard drive shopping really soon, what should I get? What should I avoid? |
November 17th, 2003, 06:02 AM | #2 |
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
I've had good luck with Western Digital. But HD's are like brands of tape. Everybody has had problems with one brand or another. There are several threads on HD's in the PC editing section. I don't think your computer is set up to recognize the real big drives (over 135 GB). So, the 120 GB drives will offer the best value.
__________________
Jeff Donald Carpe Diem Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Where to Buy? From the best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
November 17th, 2003, 06:28 AM | #3 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
I used to read up on hard drive tests, for many years actually. Western Digital almost always came out on top. I have 2 computers with Western Digital HD's in them. They're still ticking, and no bad sectors.
|
November 17th, 2003, 08:47 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,922
|
The major players are all about the same so far as reliability and throughput. One may edge the other one by a very slim margin but that'll have no noticeable impact on your capture, or any other function for that matter.
I've used Seagate, Western Digital, Quantom (maxtor) and IBM (Hitachi) over the last 15 years and had very few problems. buy what's most cost effective. |
November 17th, 2003, 09:03 AM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chigasaki, Japan.
Posts: 1,660
|
The only thing I'd avoid is drives made in Korea or China, namely IODATA and Buffalo. Any of the Japanese or Taiwanese made drives from the above mentioned companies should serve you well. But, as mentioned above, there is always that odd one out. Hey, computers are only human.
__________________
Adrian DVInfo.net Search for quick answers Where to buy? From the best in the business...DVInfo.net sponsors |
November 17th, 2003, 10:03 AM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
Promax recommends IBM/Hitachi drives for (parallel)ATA drives. WD is also good. They are the fastest drive to run applications off of, followed by IBM. WD drives are a bit noisier than IBM.
If you really care about reliability you can check storagereview.com's reliability database, which is a database of user reports but the sample rates aren't that high. |
November 17th, 2003, 10:31 AM | #7 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hampshire, England
Posts: 1,545
|
I have had bad read writng experiences with seagate IDE drives. Do a search and you might find the thread I posted.
I now use Maxtor drives, and they have always performed well for me. WD IU have had also in the past and worked well again. Cheers, Ed smith
__________________
Ed Smith Hampshire, UK Good things come to those who wait My Skiing web www.Frostytour.co.uk For quick answers Search dvinfo.net | The best in the business: dvinfo.net Sponsors |
November 17th, 2003, 11:53 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 336
|
Seagate is #1 in my book.
I'm just the opposite of Ed....but all due respect.
I've never had a Maxtor that didn't become really noisy and bomb out before a year of use. I use Seagate barracudas exclusively with one exception which is Western Digital (my second choice). But, I did have one WD that bombed out on me this year(which lasted ~1.5 years). IBM's by far have the highest failure rate in a web servers with high traffic. As a comparison, I've have numerous Seagate cheetahs running in a high load server farm for 6 years without a hiccup. I would be considered a "power user" by an IT spreadsheet which could add to the fray as an FYI.
__________________
Dan Holly Anchorage, Alaska |
November 17th, 2003, 12:37 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Glendale CA
Posts: 328
|
Excellent advice! Thanks for all of the info.
Jeff- Yeah, I heard about the 135 GB "limit", but that's not too much of an issue since I don't think I'll ever have anything approaching 10 hours of DV footage on the drive simultaneously. |
November 17th, 2003, 03:27 PM | #10 |
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
The limit is, that when you format the drive (HFS+) it will only show up as about 135mb. You will have spent extra money for the larger drive and you won't be able to access that extra space.
__________________
Jeff Donald Carpe Diem Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Where to Buy? From the best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
November 17th, 2003, 05:14 PM | #11 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Tickfaw, LA
Posts: 1,217
|
I've been writing specs on systems being used. The consensus on PC drives are Western Digital and then Seagate.
Laptop drives are a different animal.
__________________
Nathan Gifford Southern Cyclist Magazine & Productions For quick answers try our Search! To see me and Rob Lohman click here |
November 17th, 2003, 08:18 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 390
|
I have a WD80 and a Maxtor Quantum 40 gig, both 7200 rpm. My Maxtor used to be my capture drive until I retired my 13 gig.. now it's my OS/Programs drive and the WD80 is the capture. Both of them are awesome, never had any problems. I've had my Maxtor for almost 2 years, and my 80 gig for about 5 months now.
|
November 17th, 2003, 09:50 PM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Amsterdam NL -Turnhout BE
Posts: 158
|
I love Seagate because they are the most silent disks I know (you really don't hear them) and they never let me down.
|
November 17th, 2003, 10:35 PM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 166
|
I have a Western Digital 120GB Special Edition with 8MB Cache. I NEVER hear this HDD at all, its worked flawlessly and it has the 8MB cache so its faster than the drives with the 2MB cache. I reccomending going to www.newegg.com to look at it and any others you're considering.
|
November 18th, 2003, 12:09 AM | #15 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
storagereview.com has some info on which drives are the quietest. Seagates are the quietest but the IBM drives are a close second with better performance (at least with applications). Promax recommends getting IBM drives for video editing and getting the 8MB buffer instead of the 2MB.
|
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|