|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 1st, 2007, 06:48 AM
|
#46 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West Africa
Posts: 255
|
Most "low quality DV" videos are low light videos. That's the real problem. ;)
|
|
|
|
February 1st, 2007, 09:18 AM
|
#47 |
|
Obstreperous Rex
|
Seun, I think you're absolutely right, and agree with you 100%.
However -- do you realize you're replying to a thread that's more than three years old? Wow! |
|
|
|
|
February 1st, 2007, 09:17 PM
|
#48 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 56
|
And I was the original poster and I'm still reading this thread, thanks to e-mail notification. I don't think I've been on this forum for many years. It's like I've been asleep for a few years and just woke up. Even my orginal video clip is still on my website!
Was back to Panasonic and they claimed the quality is a good as it gets for this level of camera. So I just decided to use the camera. And regarding low light quality, the Panasonic DV852 is pretty good. So I have to be thankful for that. Now I guess everyone has moved on to HD video? Wondering if that solves the problem? |
|
|
|
|
February 2nd, 2007, 09:22 AM
|
#49 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
With email notification a thread can live longer than the poster.
|
|
|
|
|
February 2nd, 2007, 02:16 PM
|
#50 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hamden CT
Posts: 470
|
Just thought I would add a little something to an interesting thread.
I use to work for a duplication house and we would produce 500 VHSs off a Digitalbeta Deck and the VHS quality was awesome. I was amazed at how good the duplications came out. I never compared the DigitalBeta Master to the VHS directly, but nevertheless the VHSs looked great. |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
